. >> i am wendy robinson. i am a san francisco resident here in support of all of the comments of the prior two speakers and in support of this discretionary review application. i would emphasize one part. the comment about the documentation committed about necessity. studies and evidence presented to you do in fact show that the t-mobile customers in that area are satisfied with their coverage. t-mobile hasn't presented anything to refute that. there were comments from the sponsor from t-mobile where he quoted two communications they received from customers and some comments about complaints about their coverage. but there was nothing present body whether or not those complaints would be solved by this instaulation or how they became solved if they remained outstanding outstanding. whether or not that is .0001% and the rest are completely satisfied. look at their website and see how much they tout how happy their customers are with their coverage which contradicts the necessity requirement for this applicatio