weon the supply side continue our work in terms of advancing renewables, wind, led improvementemendous in terms of deployment. from the come investments we made it through a loan guarantee program that was part of the activity of the last years. some controversy. let me say it has been a terrific success. billion loan portfolio has had 2% of default. fund at theeserve congress excels -- itself put aside for what they considered risky technologies. utility scale, solar energy has been a beneficiary of that. the department's initial loan guarantees got the first project going. since then send large projects have gone forward with completely private financing. a third element is the president has articulated what is called the "all the above" strategy. reducing co2ted to emissions. that is the starting point. constraint of lowered co2 omissions we are working to put forward all the investments we need so that all energy sources are part of that future. we have committed to a billion- dollar loan guarantee program for advancing also energy with lowers omissions. i could go on. there are a

weon kw yet what these immune changes actually mean for real health outcomes, especially for really serious illness. we have good preliminary evidence that there may be increased risk for infectious illness. when you talk about what this means for someone who has cancer, you need to tread cautiously. certainly, i think that... we know that the way you feel can affect your immune system, but that may not be such a large effect that will influence the outcome of an illness. recent books and articles have made dramatic claims about the causes of and cures for cancer. i get concerned about people who say you should be able to stop your cancer, and if you don't, you should feel guilty, because we know that having cancer is already a significant burden. you're not at fault if you have cancer. if you cannot stop it, that has nothing to do with your being a good person. many of the less conventional therapists might suggest that that's the case. that's a real matter for concern. even cautious scientists agree that our minds and bodies influence each other. what they are only beginning to understand

what will we do in the event president assad uses chemical weapons -- still in power for what will weon -- do? general dempsey. >> i cannot speak for our elected officials, but i can tell you we have repaired for that contingency. we will be prepared if necessary to act. >> will that necessitate your coming back? >> that depends on the resolution. is outside the time limit, would you come back to us? >> it would depend on whether or not he pulled the trigger in the resolution to cover that contingency. >> would it be appropriate to take military action? there is a red line that has been drawn. >> this is intended not to destroy his entire capacity or the country. if he makes the decision to do that in the future, we would believe we would need to make it clear that we need to do more. that is evident. believe that will happen. i think the message will be clear. i think it will send a chilling , and that is why i think he and the russians are responding the way that they are. i disagree about this that it will drag us into something down the road. i worry much more about not doing someth

meantime, a white house official has said that the world will note if russia can't get this chemical weonseather: russiaoe't want the blame to be put on the syrians. it wants it to be shared between the rebels and the government of syria. >> brian: here is the other thing, they're starting to upgrade the amount of arms and heavy machinery and heavy material that is going into syria to support their army as is hezbollah and iran. for the first time, we understand the c.i.a. is escorting arms to the rebels. so things are upgrading in town because for one thing, i'm not sure what makes up the rebels, i haven't been there, but i will say this, there is russia, iran, and hezbollah all working for the syrian government, which has a standing army. >> steve: it's interesting you should mention the rebels because vladimir putin is writing an op ed in the pages of the "new york times." >> brian: why wouldn't he? >> steve: yeah. he says there is no doubt that poison gas was used, but, you know, there is not evidence that shows that the assad government used it and, in fact, as we know from the russia

number of mayors and elected officials, scientists and doctors and lawyers that are physical how far weons of have come. we have to take a moment to recognize we have a long wait to go. the first thing that has to be said, worse fully, if people in america think that we have moved beyond the issue of race, they are wrong. president clinton said we have a long way home and a long way to go. the one that rises to the level if you arey struggling to survive from day to day. rights movement assumes that people would be alive. they struggle for better education and a better job. this is undermining the ability to get to the next day. that is one thing that we have lost our way on. ago, weis said not long did not get beat on the way to selma. -- so that people could kill each other. there is too much of that going on in america. this is an issue we have to address. as we speak about the moral responsibility of the united states abroad, we don't always speak about the moral responsibility at home to make sure that each individual has the access to the essential freedoms, to walk the streets safel