. >> is that true of, say, wescott when the category was unemployed father and was enlarged to in -- include an appointment is? is a true of goldfarb, the social security cases, what congress did when it did was just a piece with everything where the man was the, person and family and the woman was the subordinate person. so to say we want to go back to a congress that had that mindset and asked what they would have done is a little hard. >> it is difficult, and -- >> well, and don't pretend that you implement in congress' intent when you say we're going to put in place we were talking about a remedy, not in terms of finding a violation. don't pretend that your implement in congress' intent when you look a what congress, a congress 60 years later would do. >> when you're remedy a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up her love again, you're never everybody congress' intent. >> that's true but you can ask what would they wanted if they knew they couldn't make this commission was that's what i thought it had to go back to 1952, they will either to take the benefit away from the w

from the valleyff wescott is 80. near everest tomorrow, for the weekend were getting warmer every day. 85 saturday and 86 sunday money. 88 degrees tuesday. and the end of next week we will be flirting with the 90s. >>> for this group known as the scorpions and the road runners, they are playing flag football. >> reporter: they are getting a few last-minute tips from the he is filling us in on some of the details. >> the cardinals, that is our favorite team. >> if you play football you have to wear a mouth guard. you do not want your melt to hurt. >> the most important thing is to have fun and -- i'm going to do my best today. >> with those words of it's time to get the kids into position. and they're getting this game started. the best play in the playbook is the hand-off and are run. even if you run the wrong way. the key, it is to have fun. what is going on now? it really doesn't matter. what is the objective? >> to get the quarterback. >> the lead in the coach letting them know how they are feeling. >> my leg is t

is that true of say wescott when they -- the category was unemployed father and it was enlarged to include unemployed mothers? was it true of the social security cases? when what congress did when it did it was just a piece with everything where man was the dominant person in the family, and the woman was the subordinate person. so to say we want to go back to a congress that had that mind-set and ask what they would have done is a little hard. >> it is difficult. . >> well, then don't pretend that you're implementing congress's intent when you say we're going put in place when we're talking about a remedy, not in terms of finding a violation, don't pretend that you're implementing congress's intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. >> mr. chief justice, when you're remedying a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or leveling down, you are never implementing congress's intent. >> that's true. but you ask ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldn't make this discrimination. that's why i thought well, if you have to go back to '52, they're eithe

. >> isn't that true of wescott when the category was unemployed father and was enlarged to include unemployed mothers? is a true of goldfarb, the social security cases, what congress did when it did it was just a piece with everything with them and was the dominant person in the family and the woman was the subordinate person. so to say we want to go back to a congress that had that mindset and asked what they would have done it a little hard. >> it is difficult and -- >> then don't pretend that you're implementing congress' intent when you say with going to put in place we were talking about the remedy, not in terms of finding a violation. don't pretend you're implementing congress' intent window to what a congress six years later would do. >> when you are remedying agenda discriminatory statute 11 up or down you inevitably making congress' intent. >> that's true b you can ask what would thewant if they knew they coul't make this is commission? that's why thought if you have to to 1952 gng after either take theenefit away from t woman or give it to the man the two principles that support you