since the peace of westphalia the war had finally become an affair between sovereign states the nowadays it is not a war or a confrontation between sovereign states and going to visit confrontation between wills between different interests. not just between organizations but also between organization. look at. what has modified the concept of war from the traditional one to the current one is the fall of the agreement established during the westphalia treaty. the treaty implied the wars are an affair between states and when a country was defeated on the battlefield except in the political defeat and turned into an ally of the winner. nowadays the war is not an affair between states anymore because it became more expensive and the prophets have reduced it to. the present it depends on the relative productiveness of the different economies in other terms and the competitiveness of the different countries taken a system. in an era where the states lose power we see on the other hand the growth of the corporations it is easy to think about the american corporations because they are the most

the current one is the fall of the agreement established during the westphalia treaty which the treaty implied that wars are an affair between states when a country was defeated on the battlefield except in the political defeat and turned into an ally of the winner. nowadays the war is not an affair between states anymore because it became more expensive and the prophets have reduced it to. the present it depends on the relative productiveness of the different economies in other terms competitiveness of the different countries take in a system. where the states lose power we see on the other hand the growth of the corporations it is easy to think about the american corporations because they are the most powerful ones if we could also talk about the swiss ones that aren't under the spotlight as much as the americans. but they still exist they are strong and can determine the future of the whole world why because they have more powerful means than the state's. corporations or economic but aren't subject to a government anymore back in the day some governments have their own corporations

the peace of westphalia. states. a confrontation between. between. between different interests. not just between organizations but also between. the concept of. the current one is the. treaty. the treaty. between states. the political defeat. of. the present it depends. of the different economies. of the different countries taken a system. we see. the growth of the corporations it is easy to think about. because they are the most powerful. the swiss ones that. as much as the americans. but they still exist. future of the world. states. aren't subject. to day it's not like. today the corporations states have states. of connection between the economic and the political power. of the people. of the state as an institution. the state. services. the services. citizens. are intended for the people economic power. in this particular historical context. is the only real power. is the interests. the subject is the interests is not the state. is the the state. strong. connection with the state. we aren't talking about the. multinational company. a multinational company with a corporation

since the peace of westphalia. states. between. between. between different interests. between organizations but also between. the concept of. treaty. the treaty. between states. the political defeat. of. the. present it depends. on the competitiveness of the different countries taking a system. it is easy to think about. the swiss one. as much as the. but they still exist. future. states. aren't subject to. states. states. of connection between the economic and the political power. of the people. state as an institution. the state. services. services. citizens. are intended for the people economic power. in this particular historical context. is the power. the dimension of. the interests is the. subject that is the interests is not the state. is the state. strong. connection with the state. we aren't talking about the. multinational company. a multinational company with a corporation made of people from different states here we are talking about corporations that can influence several states to have states have their disposal. and we have to think that we just experien

since the peace of westphalia. states. between. between. between different interests. between organizations but also between. the concept of. treaty. the treaty. between states. the political defeat. of. the. present it depends. of the different economies. of the different countries taken a system. it is easy to think about. the swiss ones that. but they still exist. states. aren't subject to. states. states. of connection between. the political power. of the people. of the state. the state. services. tended for the. economic power. in this particular. is the. thing. is the interests is the. subject is the interests. of the state. with the state. a multinational company with a corporation made of people from different states here we are talking about corporations that can influence several states to have states at their disposal. and we have to think that we just experienced a case that can be key to understanding what a corporation is and what a state is that if it is true that the head of the italian military secret service is. under the control of an italian corpora

little eurocentric and i apologize, but i think at thei end of the middle ages with the treaty of westphaliawe startedy establishing between nationstates in agreement that the sovereignty of the nation-state was the number one sort of legal issue in relation between states and i think you t in the post-world war two order that the idea of the responsibility to protect often trumps the right to sovereignty for the state which seems to be excellent reading in the post cold war order especially with russia justifying georgia by the sword of normative example of the west intervening in kosovo do you think we are moving into a post system in the western states? >> i don't think we were ever that deeply into the system. the 19th century may have had that just in europe you think about 20th century we have all these marxist running around trying to undermine other states in the name of the communist revolution we have the united states trying to do the same thing except in an anti-communist direction anyone suspected sovereignty terribly well and i don't, you know, as an ethical matter, i think tha