i know that from the very first weta itself -- the agency comes with some deep sources of funding. these are very expensive products, but they have regional tax dollars as well as some of the monies that were done for water transportation. there are remarks from those sources of funding, which are pretty good. they are funding this joint planning exercise for the most part. when it comes to the red planning areas, these are grayer areas of who is responsible for funding. some improvements in those areas, such as the demolition of pier 1/2 and pier 2, are called out in the plan as linked to expansion of the ferry terminal. in our mou, there is some contemplation that is a project expense. but there are other areas where it is not as clear. improvements to ferry plaza intersect with leasehold issues we have. a lot of these areas are currently under long-term lease, so there is negotiation not just between the agencies but the other leaseholders. ultimately, if we were in 2008, i would say this would be a public-private partnership in our traditional model and bring in a user or devel