81
81
Mar 10, 2014
03/14
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
all of the iq test that word ministered and all of the wexler tests fail within the standard error of measurement. they were accompanied by the administration of further intelligence testing testing for confirmatory. >> is that what you won't? i go back to justice sotomayor's question. you start mucking around with 95%. it's all over the law. 95% is a classical measure by scientists of when they have confidence and in fact regression analysis seems to establish the fact is a fact here that is in tort law or whether jury trials are discriminating because they don't have black people on the jury. it's all over the loss so i assume you are not asking us to muck around with that number because i don't know what the consequences would be. you get the same test six times and now we have reduced it from 5%. if he's above 70 all the time it could be 1/100th of 1%. is that what you want to have happen? >> as to your latter point. >> and my right and what i said? >> you are not right in some of the things he said. the last thing you said is not right. >> before the last thing. see the last thin
all of the iq test that word ministered and all of the wexler tests fail within the standard error of measurement. they were accompanied by the administration of further intelligence testing testing for confirmatory. >> is that what you won't? i go back to justice sotomayor's question. you start mucking around with 95%. it's all over the law. 95% is a classical measure by scientists of when they have confidence and in fact regression analysis seems to establish the fact is a fact here...
160
160
Mar 18, 2014
03/14
by
CNNW
tv
eye 160
favorite 0
quote 0
there's a wexler scale, the rorschach and in certain people who are responsible for people's lives before they are in the position to fly a plane or give them a badge or gun. it's dangerous we do not do a psychological test of individuals before they enter a profession. who is going to say i got problems, don't give me the job. or that person may not know they have problems. >> thank you. richard quest. stay with us. when we come back i want to talk about some of the other theories out there. some may not be as crazy as they sound. and we are answering your questions tonight. tweet us using the #370qs. and this will be your premium right here. sorry to interrupt, i just want to say, i combined home and auto with state farm, saved 760 bucks. love this guy. okay, does it bother anybody else that the mime is talking? frrreeeeaky! [ male announcer ] bundle home and auto and you could save 760 bucks. alright, mama, let's get going. [ yawns ] naptime is calling my name. [ male announcer ] get to a better state. state farm. [ male announcer ] get to a better state. it's built to be as fast as it
there's a wexler scale, the rorschach and in certain people who are responsible for people's lives before they are in the position to fly a plane or give them a badge or gun. it's dangerous we do not do a psychological test of individuals before they enter a profession. who is going to say i got problems, don't give me the job. or that person may not know they have problems. >> thank you. richard quest. stay with us. when we come back i want to talk about some of the other theories out...
92
92
Mar 8, 2014
03/14
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 92
favorite 0
quote 0
all of the iq test that word ministered and all of the wexler tests fail within the standard error of measurement. they were accompanied by the administration of further intelligence testing testing for confirmatory. >> is that what you won't? i go back to justice sotomayor's question. you start mucking around with 95%. it's all over the law. 95% is a classical measure by scientists of when they have confidence and in fact regression analysis seems to establish the fact is a fact here that is in tort law or whether jury trials are discriminating because they don't have black people on the jury. it's all over the loss so i assume you are not asking us to muck around with that number because i don't know what the consequences would be. you get the same test six times and now we have reduced it from 5%. if he's above 70 all the time it could be 1/100th of 1%. is that what you want to have happen? >> as to your latter point. >> and my right and what i said? >> you are not right in some of the things he said. the last thing you said is not right. >> before the last thing. see the last thin
all of the iq test that word ministered and all of the wexler tests fail within the standard error of measurement. they were accompanied by the administration of further intelligence testing testing for confirmatory. >> is that what you won't? i go back to justice sotomayor's question. you start mucking around with 95%. it's all over the law. 95% is a classical measure by scientists of when they have confidence and in fact regression analysis seems to establish the fact is a fact here...
243
243
Mar 18, 2014
03/14
by
CNNW
tv
eye 243
favorite 0
quote 0
there's a wexler scale, the roar shack and in certain people who are responsible for people's lives before they are in the position to fly a plane or give them a badge or gun. it's dangerous we do not do a psychological test of individuals before they enter a profession. who is going to say i got problems, don't give me the job. or that person may not know they have problems. >> thank you. richard quest. stay with us. when we come back i want to talk about some of the other theories out there. some may not be as crazy as they sound. and we are answering your questions tonight. tweet us using the #370qs. so ally bank has a raise your rate cd that won't trap me in a rate. that's correct. cause i'm really nervous about getting trapped. why's that? uh, mark? go get help! i have my reasons. look, you don't have to feel trapped with our raise your rate cd. if our rate on this cd goes up, yours can too. oh that sounds nice. don't feel trapped with the ally raise your rate cd. ally bank. your money needs an ally. and his new boss told him two things -- cook what you love, and save your money. joe
there's a wexler scale, the roar shack and in certain people who are responsible for people's lives before they are in the position to fly a plane or give them a badge or gun. it's dangerous we do not do a psychological test of individuals before they enter a profession. who is going to say i got problems, don't give me the job. or that person may not know they have problems. >> thank you. richard quest. stay with us. when we come back i want to talk about some of the other theories out...
233
233
Mar 19, 2014
03/14
by
KQED
tv
eye 233
favorite 0
quote 0
whether or not there were any jewish veterans who had been denied this and, as a result, congressman wexlerogether an act called the leonard kravitz jewish war veterans act of 2001, and this act then got expanded somewhat to allow also for hispanic and african-american and other ethnic groups. >> ifill: basically go back through the files and reconstruct people who -- >> right, and through world war ii and also up to korea. to the criteria was first to review those who that did won the distinguished service cross. and my understanding is they picked out about 625 soldiers. from that, it was whittled down again after reviews and documentation and so on to about 200-and-some-odd. this is why it took to long. it took ten years to do this but i think the fact that the record center in st. louis had been burned and records lost. >> ifill: you mentioned leonard kravitz, whose nephew was at the white house, he's known as lenny kravitz. >> yes. >> ifill: how widespread was the kind of discrimination that would allow people not to be recognized for their h heroics? >> during my time in service, i di
whether or not there were any jewish veterans who had been denied this and, as a result, congressman wexlerogether an act called the leonard kravitz jewish war veterans act of 2001, and this act then got expanded somewhat to allow also for hispanic and african-american and other ethnic groups. >> ifill: basically go back through the files and reconstruct people who -- >> right, and through world war ii and also up to korea. to the criteria was first to review those who that did won...
104
104
Mar 17, 2014
03/14
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 104
favorite 0
quote 0
all of the iq tests that were administered to all of the wexler tests were company because they fell within the standard error of measurement. they were accompanied by the administration, a folder intelligence testing for confirmatory -- >> i go back to justice sotomayor is question. start mucking around with 95 percent. it is all over the law. 95 percent is a classical measure by scientists so when they have confidence that the fact that the regression analysis seems to establish. it is in tort law, jerry chiles discriminating because they have black people on the jury. it is all over the law. i assume that we do not ask for this to muck around with that number is i don't know what the consequences would be. reduce it. the same tests six times. now we reduced it from 5%. above 70 all the time. one one-hundredth of 1% to read is that what you want to have happened? >> let me just ask you. >> you are not right in some of the things he said. the last thing you said is not right. >> the last thing. >> the last thing is important. >> a nice thing is that important. my thinking to the las
all of the iq tests that were administered to all of the wexler tests were company because they fell within the standard error of measurement. they were accompanied by the administration, a folder intelligence testing for confirmatory -- >> i go back to justice sotomayor is question. start mucking around with 95 percent. it is all over the law. 95 percent is a classical measure by scientists so when they have confidence that the fact that the regression analysis seems to establish. it is...