now what fe adviw whate adviw rth, just whatouh, just whath, just whath, jus whatvi j said thvi j s arevi are j s a down with matthewith maith maith ith h martomthis evemart and hisrt and his faly, what advice would youdvic ofem?ofem?of>> g>> gate la>> gat maure read all of th read a instructions. i know there were questions about some of e int ructions s case, what materiaseat materat m anat m happens if yo happens if yo appens if yopens if yoyoyo mbination ofmbinioofio om legit om legeg search search er information you get inside.get he wilt win this appealthis appeal ppeald on chaeal ton c ton c ton ccredibility of the witneity of the u might also challenge the relatiip betwelatietwe ment itness.ss.ss. whatds o whussions ar whussions between the lawyer and the lawyer for the witwyer for i know that the jukne gave somee gave some gaof tinformation. i would say, don't loy, don' don' d th may be yourth mchance turth mchanurthth make a deal. ma some are s i will not ma i will not ma i wil a de i wil a de i wil 'deil deil deil use i use i no no information. d say, i will t say, ay, i may, i

the limits perkins went on to repeated they tell the audience he does not the people he any idea whatheontributing to america. that is not true we talk about their contributions here all the time. he talk about how they pay a disproportionate amount of income tax 35 percent of all taxes paid compared to less than 3% with the bottom 50% of workers and taxpayers. millionairess spread and what ever more influence should be comforted by a closer examination of the voting process with the electoral system. it turns out the 1% does not need any help at all. not from anybody. we one to add un to 1% to the divide a new ratio of more eye-popping ratio. but about '01% of the '01% like tom perkinsmichael bloomberg, a george soros contributing more than 40 percent of all money spen in the 2012 election cycle. 40 percent of all money spent in the 2012 cycle compared to only 15 percent in the tv the. -- 9080. tuned the trajectory for the 1% of the 1% is comforting and more than adequate compention for the nstitutional burden of putting up with the equal rights of the other 99.9% and of that i want to

or they could put at the end of it a sign that tells you whathe final sound was. this is a "ma". but they could also if they wanted to just eliminate the jaguar head and spell it completely with syllables, so that you would have "ba..." "la..." "ma." and you don't pronounce the last "a". keach: the glyphs recorded by bishop landa were, in fact, syllables -- 27 syllables. but hundreds of syllables were needed to record ancient mayan. maya scribes often carved these glyphs in fanciful ways to resemble animals or people. the creativity and innovation of maya scribes is one of the joys and challenges of deciphering. david stuart, george stuart's son, has been decoding maya glyphs since he was a boy. today, he is one of the world's leading epigraphers, scholars who decipher ancient texts. stuart: the decipherment process may begin with a single inscription or a single glyph in an inscription that will provide a really telling clue about what the phonetic value for the sign might be. to look at an example, there's an inscription from a site in northern yucatan that has a glyph that mak

and whathe fed minutes they had to tell us about the future of forward guidance in the u.s. ♪ >> welcomek to "countdown." i am mark barton. my guest is lena komileva. the fed has spoken. it looks like they are looking to truck forward guidance. think about the approach where you tie into a figure based on unemployment or do you go the more quality of -- qu alitative route? what do you think? >> absolutely. the question is wide open. the fed isar is that preparing to draw away the rules of the fed and throw away the rulebook. it.s confidence about rule that istaylor still very instructive. it indicates the level of the momentum and the strength the u.s. economy. when it is still too high for them to sustain nominal rates of borrowing costs, it is not a surprise that the fed is managing.towards we talked about deflationary worries. there are a number of comments that were aired within the minutes. they talked about too low inflation. is it time within the fed statements to formalize it saying that it would keep rates low if inflation persistently stayed well below our two percent target as

went there to see the t dusty dinosaurs and y dinodino collection comeectiinets ofriosere os'tt ith whath wh rld really needed. de now we're in a tre're periodd of convergence. rgen issues about the environment space exploration. l these things are reae things aeae thineae thinthings that thinmuseums can --can -- they' ortant tu orstu tu of the 21st century. 're lucky'reomeone'reom'rerere the le who had a lot o who hon for that and brought uatinto those mmunities. >> sitting next to you? ng nex nex [lghter] ter] ter] >> right, i don' rigmeann' politica >> i do th mike'th ent wa'th t th impt nt bth impt ntmpmp relevanc of a museum and of theuseum d of theus of whuse sector is whuse changed. c e rk i aligned i ali ali with the maj with the maj with the the t t t t time and y teetime ain the teeti teeti exhibitions on the environmeon t on issues of human healts of human hs of human h education educ. ed >> if you buil >>, people come. >>el f you build it f you build it e could bout that a little bit, right? is is what you said? a conversation wa comyerolleagueague bi moyers. you have n ly exp

whath a bank could amend is called a hell or high water provision is very unusual which would force men's wearhouse to close the deal with them even though regulators did not give it a sign off. that is an issue of contention and we will have to see how it lays out over the next couple of weeks. thereot of merger news -- are a lot of activists agitating these days. stay with us because i want to ,alk about the deal environment this onslaught of investor activism we are seeing. sweeneynging in paul and merger arbitrage strategist. let's start with joseph a bank in this saga that is going on in the men's retail sector. it is interesting they seem to be going back-and-forth. ultimately, who wins? >> i've been covering this from the beginning. i am more than aware of what is going on. the biggest issue here is the timing. when you look at the release, it said we need to do this quickly. if you're going to give us your best offer, give it to us right now because if you're not, we will close this eddie bauer d eal. that is what is happening now and they need the due diligence to increase the pr

whathe question here is, can be done to tamp down on some of these regional tensions to make sure thatthe sea does not boil up? to make sure that to the extent possible that as china grows and becomes more of a great power, as japan moves in its trajectory that we don't find ourselves in a military conflict. processes here. i will speak for the west side. -- i will speak for the u.s. side. the japanese are an independent variable in all this. their decisions, whether they ecide to be more confrontational -- my guess is they are challenging military control in the sea -- my worry is that, i hope the chinese are thinking that through and where that could lead to. i worry that sometimes the americans and others always don't -- don't always think through these issues. we have a strong posture and react to these things. where that leads -- the issues of escalation -- lots of good work has been done on that. especially at the political level, make sure that members of congress are educated about that. right how is ay mismatch between strategy and resources. in terms of strategy, i speak not