pic up your paper whether it is "the washington post" or"the new york times," you coulbe sure that whatou read would ge you a great picture of at was going on in washington, at wasoing on around the world. the dend that it made on your time w so much less than the demand on your time now, with this very fragmented wayople are gettingheir news, people are getting the entertainment. > you check thenternet, you check this, youheck that >> exactly. you have to go to so many sources, this gigantic menu of plac where you can pick your news, pi your enttainment selections. it is too much work to do whaa paperid in a very compressed way. >> this is going to sound like heresy, but i am going to put this out as an argument. could it be argued that at is really th more democratic way to do it,he more egalitari y to do it? to l people decide what it is they are interested in, as opposed to some elitis who say from their offishat peoplehould know this and have no need to know this? >> with your argument - ahmad >> iis not my argument, it is ju -- >> in reali, though, too much oice can be oppressive. a

if youok look the data in terms of the amount of job declinover 2009 it was wildly in excessmy of whatoudetails of the monly pulse of the numbers. if you look at thasharp deine in joblessç claims, that surge in the rchasing managers index, those tradionally are followed by material gainsúffr payroll so i think i 2010 quite distct from dean you're prably going to createç more than 2.5 million js until thnumber one issue is jobs but i think we will be creating them. woodruff:ç it sounds like he's saying we've cut the bone. they inevibly have to create jobs. >> we e seeing a slowerç rate of decline. for ample, taking the jobless claims we were up around 6,000 a week. thatç higher than is consistent wh job growth. if wgo back to 2 last ression, we didn't actually startu! creating jobuntil jobless claims felunder 400,000 a ek. we're stilin a area where we're looking losing jobs in the month of decemb and probably i the first couple of months of nt year. i'm sorry we're in 2010. thisear. and in ter of/+ expecting strong growth inventories we will s a bounce there but much of our inventy