what's coming up is what adam boler has been working on to launch several ships out of the water here testing how we pay medicare for services that moves to paying procedures and sickness and paying for outcomes and health. the more risk as a provider you're willing to assume, the less we'll be micromanaging how you achieve that. >> saturday is the open enrollment deadline for others. >> the benchmark is down for the 2019 premium. you have premiums in many states down double digits, often 20% where they've worked with us on reinsurance mechanisms. if you simply are not making a choice and auto reenrolling in the plan you were in, and stability, of course, helps that, you don't actually show up in the numbers of auto reenrollment until the last minute in the system. so it's going to be very important we close the books on open enrollment and see where that stands. >> i'm going to my phoner friends, caitlyn owens and sam baker right here. but before i come to them, the most recent drug price announcement you made piggybacking off a european price control program which isn't definitely.

what's being done? dr. adams: i'm proud to say after i put out our naloxone advisory, the first advisory in 13 years, naloxone prescribing is up over 350%. we know communities have been able to turn around the opioid epidemic, have really leaned into saturation with naloxone. mr. bernstein: for people who don't know, what is naloxone and what does it do? dr. adams: it is an antidote to an opioid overdose, safe, they usually occur in a garage, in a home environment, a bathroom and bring death occurs within four minutes and until we can have an ambulance that can transport you in four minutes, everyone needs to carry naloxone if they are at risk at meeting someone with an overdose who is most of us. we are making sure communities can access naloxone and expanding treatment and breaking down barriers so we can have more inpatient treatment and outpatient treatment through things such as telemedicine, project echo. we need folks to understand that we will never be able to have enough inpatient beds to meet the needs.

what's being done? dr. adams: i'm proud to say after i put out our naloxone advisory, the first advisory in 30 years, naloxone prescribing is up over 350%. we know communities have been able to turn around the opioid epidemic, have really leaned into saturation with naloxone. mr. bernstein: for people who don't know what is naloxone and what does it do? audience member: it's a very safe medication that's an antidote to an opioid overdose. over 50% of overdoses are occurring in a home environment , in a garage, a bedroom a bathroom. brain death occurs in four minutes. unless we invent an am blew beau lance that can teleport to your house in four minutes, we need to make sure everyone understands that they should carry naloxone if they're at risk of encountering someone who is having an overdose which right now is pretty much everybody. we're expanding treatment and trying to break down barriers so we can have more both inpatient treatment and outpatient treatment through things such as telemedicine, project echo.

one of the early letters, john adams says we must explain ourselves to each other. that is what they begin to do. correspondenceul and has been collected in one volume. it is an old edition. compilation of these letters. it is a wonderful correspondence. i think it is called the jefferson-adams letters. something like that. it is worthwhile. jefferson brought back from france, it was the image i think washington was looking for when he was putting together this new cabinet. was elected that he as president of the american philosophical society in 1797. i think it interesting, when he was in power, he would write back to colleagues, he was very active in the philosophical society, but i look at the letters he wrote back and he does a little name dropping of some -- of who he was having dinner with. world-renowned natural scientists. were in the french intellectual circles. back hisy he brings reputation as being part of the he bringstsia and back very much his reputation as a francophile. hamilton very much an anglophile. everyone knew it of course. then, how did this begin to pl

siegel, whats adam is your interpretation of this? i think we are likely to see a very temporary change of china's description of the policies and not a real change in actual policy. as you mentioned at the top, china wants to move up the value chain and wants to be a technology leader, and it is not easily going to give up those goals. emily: what does this actually mean? beijing is ahat master at rolling out plans. not always as good at executing them. and really good at saying they are suspending problematic regulations, often to have them creep back in in other forms. we have seen them time and time again. i don't see why this would be any different, we think that china's technological ambitions. why would they get off that course? emily: gary locke was on earlier today saying something similar. take a listen to what he had to say. don't think the chinese back away from their overall plan of one to be world-class leaders. so much of what they use now comes almost exclusively from the united states. when the obama and even the trum

what to do? i don't know. but they could have oversight over the machines. >> they do have oversight -- >> i totally -- i don't agree with you, adam timey notion that somehow investing should be years and decades, like warren buffett -- >> i'm not saying that. >> what is the right time frame? is it minutes, is it days, is it seconds? who cares? all that's happening is computers are taking over what humans would be making the decision. humans would take a minute, machines can do it in second. what's the big deal? i love it when government decides this is the right way to do it. that's so much b.s. >> because it can be minuted. you have to prove it can't be. if it can't, then great. >> you could have manipulation now with just humans doing it. >> i understand. >> there was humans doing things when there was or floor traders. >> the most manipulation on wall street was before the 1920s, before any of this stuff went robotic. >> before the sec. >> right. that's people. i mean, it's what you make the computer do that's manipulating. there are regulations -- david: there are regulations, but we've seen regulators try to catch up with te

he is getting a little nervous because he knows the adams family are going to be returning to the notice states. -- united states. he says what about the portraits? i must have john adams. and this is where this remark is. he says i must have adams for my collection. there is other evidence and the things we have left that jefferson was putting together a collection of portraits of men that had been very instrumental in the revolution. he expanded to include the enlightenment thinkers that formed the intellectual base that led to the revolution. even early explorers who had first come upon the north american continent. from some of his references, these portraits -- some were painted, some were bust portraits. these were being displayed in his residence in paris. it served as the american legation. when someone came up across, perhaps a european comes in to do business here, the importance of this collection, what this collection was saying would not be lost. this is representing this young, new, maybe the raw american republic. he had to have john adams. what he does not say and what i cannot determine, was his own portrait

listen to what adam schiff says about that. >> my take away is there is a real prospect on the day donald trump leaves office, the justice deputy may indict him and he may be the first president to face real jail time. >> adam schiff be right? >> it goes back to the jon edwards case where he had similar conduct and he was charged but that was an unsec l unsuccessful prosecution, not guilty and a number the jury didn't make a decision on. so i think that there is a real question as to whether these are real violations or not. the fact that michael cohen played guilty to them is not in and of it self-the issue as to whether there is ill legali ill. whether this is a personal issue is a legal issue that's going to be taken up by the courts at some point in time. maybe not in connection with this largely because this is really coming down to a political question because there is an issue if congress decides to take it up and review this issue in connection with an impeachment investigation or hearing, they are going to have to make a determination on this whether it's a high crime or misdemea

brown had already done a portrait of adams. what portrait, we do not believe it is existence today. he already painted the entire adams family. adams was connected to brown and jefferson together. he had already painted him once. so he may have had a little head start on this, where with jefferson, he only had couple of -- a couple of sittings. you could well be right about that. he was more familiar with adams. >> you spoke about a different matter -- member of the hemmings family, then i would have expected you to mention. i would appreciate your comments on how jefferson responded to the rumors that swirled about him, with respect to his illegitimate children. gaye: these rumors went into the newspapers and 1802, and his first term as president. at monticello he had a concubine named sally. i mentioned james hemmings, who was -- who was his -- her elder brother. --ly came as a ladies made maid. maria did not come until later. sally accompanied her over. she was in paris as well. the scandal was not put into print until 1802. how did jefferson handle that? he said practically nothi

this is what adam schiff of the intel committee said. any information on this president that could compromise national security decisions. it's a towering allegation, but that's what democrats minds are. >> adam schiff chomping at the bit to get in. overnight we came across a new piece of video of the incoming acting chief of staff, mick mulvaney talking about the president before the election in 2016. let's take a quick listen to that. >> yes, i'm supporting donald trump. i'm doing so as enthusiastically as i can given the fact i think he's a terrible human being, but the choice on the other side is just as bad. >> terrible human being. so. >> the president's going to love to hear that one. >> presumably he hasn't heard it yet, but he certainly will now if he's watching cnn. what does that mean for mulvaney's place as the new acting chief of staff and for the direction of the white house in 2019? >> look, mulvaney has been the president's go-to choice for a number of things. he was cfpb, and then office of management and budget, and thou

and then from what adam smith calls the simple and liberal plan of quality and liberty and justice. with the quality of social standing and liberty to invent the internet and equal justice. it is the egalitarian of this liberalism i went to look at these traditional concerns that don't believe in quality. not french style inequality after the event and then equal rights so you are supposed to know this kind of thing. even though it works in other societies but to say i paid for that i should get most of it we would want to do that. that all things are held in common that was always the first one because i want practice some in the great society and was complaining by correspondence thought the messiah was about to come again from the fourth century on? and with this off - - apprehension? it is at sensibility that you should know with business to manage it. so what then? so those are the virtue ethics and you can find pieces of that with confucius and also abraham make and there is an old joke and then naturally. with prudence and justice and courage and temperance and faithful and l

this is thejob i'm here to do, will deliver no matter what —— and adamant.left. the daily telegraph is asking a question that's already had an answer. she's already told conservative mps that she's not going to lead them into the next election. my personal view has been, for some time now, and i've said this to businesses both domestic and international, that the prime minister is probably most likely to step back after the 29th of march, 2019 if, given all the psychodrama that's going on behind us, if we actually are going to be leaving the european union at that point. i think after having delivered brexit, if she can deliver brexit, then that's probably going to be a moment for her to announce her specific timetable for departure. in terms of who will fill her shoes, of course much speculation yesterday about who might be the leader of the conservative party. the bookies are having fun right now, aren't they? i think one of the reasons why she is still in 10 downing street this morning is because the conservatives parliamentary party can't actually really

here's what adam schiff, the likely incoming chairman of the house intelligence committee said on face the nation. >> my take away is there is a real prospect that on the day donald trump leaves office, the justice department may indict him. he is the first president in sometime to face prot expect of jail time. >> the house is in session. what are lawmakers saying? >> everyone in the house democratic caucus and senate democrats read what they saw and came to the same conclusion. it was problematic and laws were broken. you listen to adam schiff and he pointed to something that would happen after the president leaves office and not done by the president, but the southern district of new york. one of the questions is rippling through the house democratic caucus. what should they be doing? the i word is impeachment and they have been trying to beat it back and said they will focus on our agenda. if you look at democrats, they were not individuals going out every day and talking about it, but when you see filings like you saw on friday from the southern district of new york from the speci

that's what adam schiff was saying. certainly it's consistent with what everyone believes about the way this country should work. no one is above the law. >> a lot of house democrats have been talking about their committees investigating various aspects. where is the line between holding a president accountable and going on to use one of the president's favorite phrases, a witch-hunt that might backfire on democrats? >> well, congress has a responsibility to provide oversight, anderson. that's our job. unfortunately for the past two years the republican leadership on the judiciary committee has instead seen its job as -- there's been a refusal to actually provide the necessary oversight that the constitution requires us to provide. so it's not -- we shouldn't be guided by how the president characterizes anything in tweets. we ought to be guided by the facts, by the indictments, by the lies that we've seen by this president about his connections to russia. that's what has to guide us, not what the president chooses to twe

what do you think about what adam schiff is saying? >> i get his point, but i hate the term constitutional crisis. that term is used far too much in this town. however, if you tried to indict and prosecute a sitting president, you would in fact have a constitutional crisis on your hands and throw the justice department into disarray and paralyze the pedestrian. the idea is not to have anything get away with anything. you shouldn't be able to use the presidency as a shield against criminal exposure. something has to be done, but in terms of indicting a president, we have an impeachment clause and it worked. bill clinton was not removed, but it works for addressing wrong-doing. trying to indict a president would be extremely difficult. >> thank you so much. appreciate it. admitted russian conspirator came clean in court, telling a judge she engaged in conspiracy against the united states. butina admitted he acted under the direction of a russian official and used the national rifle association to bolster politics and influence politics.

liam, i'm going to pick up with you, but listen to what adam schiff is saying, a new assault on the rulef law. it's a pretty strong statement there. do you agree with that? >> i basically do, alex. it is a strong statement, but it is the case in this situation. we don't know exactly what was said between whitaker and the president during that meeting, but just the fact that whitaker is maintaining his position over this investigation, even when his own ethics lawyers have told him to recuse himself, is a real problem for the legitimacy of the department of justice and for his position. that's the whole purpose we have a nonpartisan civil service, so they can give advice like this apart from partisan politics and it's being disregarded. that underlines the whole legitimacy and the clarity. >> it's interesting and definitely worth noting, rebecca, that cnn specifically says the president did not order to stop this investigation. even if the president is not directing whitaker, could this not be considered obstruction? >> potentially it could. but in truth my feeling is that what we've alre

greg: adam, the skill of giving up. what do you think, adam?d idea but the school has come also. didn't school start because they were preparing people to be adults and you learn things you needed a life -. greg: it was home act. >> i loved home act. i made a pillow. kat: i needed a tutor. i had to stay after school for extra help sewing my pop i put him up pants because i cannot figure out how to work the machine. greg: it's funny you have that memory. you know what is weird? if this works you should have authentic teachers who taught you in first and second grade because those were the great teachers and you could remember all their names. >> mrs. garrett. tyrus: misses left give a damn. let's move on. [inaudible conversations] greg: all right, up next, a couple of split up over the holidays. you won't believe who it is. greg: to back her captain jack. irish jack sparrow impersonator says she and her husband have separated. her husband, the 300 -year-old ghost of a haitian pirate named jack. she says he was executed for feeding on the high se

hugh, you made the point about this report and what you think has to -- what threshold it has to meet for the rest of us to see it. adamff was talking about this weekend. here's what he had to say. >> i'm prepared to make sure we do everything possible so that the public has the advantage of as much of the information as it can. >> that sounds like a yes. >> well, that pretty much is a yes from my point of view. we ought to make sure this report is public. >> talking about subpoenaing it, jake. >> yeah. >> the house in 2019 looks a lot different. >> and i think to your point, yes, it is up to the attorney general whether this is made public. but what adam schiff could do and elijah cummings could do is say, you won't make it public. we're going to have bob mueller come and testify about everything he's learned about the president. they can testify in open session, and that would be akin to -- >> he can also subpoena pre-digspre-dig pre-decisional memoranda. >> i want to say two things. the first is when we talk about the mueller investigation, obviously a lot of it has to do with russia. there's also the financials. wh

. >> that's what adam schiff was saying in my new yorker piece. he was saying, look, this is an issue of compromise. was the president compromised by his relationship with russia? is he -- was he during the campaign and is he now acting in the interest of the country, or is he acting in his commercial interests? it applies in saudi arabia as well. why is he so solicitious, is it because he made so much money from saudi arabia as he has acknowledged and wants to continue to make money, and that's what schiff wants to hold hearings on, specifically to obtain the records of deutsche bank, which is a notorious money laundering organization and a german bank and where trump does most of his business. >> the president said this crosses a red line? >> the bottom line is, he can fire robert mueller, he can't fire adam schiff or nancy pelosi or the democras, and they are going to do this investigation whether trump likes it or not. >> david? >> i want to say what is difficult about this, if you look at the issues, it's possible to conflight them. when cand

here's what adam schiff, the top democrat on the house intelligence committee, had to say about that.there is a very real prospect that on the day donald trump leaves office, the justice department may indict him, that he may be the first president in quite some time to face the real prospect of jail time. we have been discussing the issue of pardons that the president may offer to people or dangle in front of people. the bigger pardon question may come down the road as the next president has to determine whether to pardon donald trump. >> reporter: and you can add to that what congressman jerry nadler, the incoming chair of the house judiciary committee said, it would certainly be an impeachable offense if it is determined that president trump directed illegal payments. alex? >> white house reporter for the associated press and msnb contributor and also author of the book, "power wars." welcome to you both. charlie, with regard to the comey matter here, what is the rain revelation from his testimony that possibly prompted the president to lash out on twitter? >> i don't think there w

and elie, if he is, tell us why you agree or disagree with what adam schiff said about having an conversationgeneral, acting or not, about what your former employer, the southern district of new york, has done with michael cohen? >> hey, dana. yeah, it doesn't matter if the president lashed out or if he asked really nicely. the bottom line is, it's patently obvious what his message was to matthew whitaker, which was, get the southern district off my back. you need to make sure the southern district doesn't do things in the future that reflect poorly on me. maybe he didn't say, make sure they don't, but if he said, i'm angry that this happened, any boss giving any subordinate that message is entirely clear what he means. he means, don't let this happen again. the southern district, look, i'm an alum, as you mentioned, is famously independent. i worked under a republican administration for four years, democratic administration for four years, it made zero difference to us who was in the white house. the southern district is completely apolitical. and to have the president leaning on the acting

>> well, there's another twist in the screw here, which is what adam schiff, whose name i think the presidentearn how to spell shortly, and jerry nadler, who will be the chair of the house judiciary committee have both focused on in the last week, which is that the president was making misleading statements that were being corroborated at the time by russia when they knew they were misleading. and the question of whether that provided a foreign adversary undue influence and ability to leverage the president because in effect, they were functioning as his alibi, as a kremlin spokesman acknowledged just the other day, that the cohen statements were accurate. i think the larger dynamic here, jim, is you now with the democrats about to take control of the house, you now have another player in the arena. and the ability of the administration to kind of make these allegations unchallenged because certainly mueller is not conducting his investigation in public, will end. and you will see, i think, a different -- you'll see all of these events from a very different vantage point. that will, i think,

i want you to whatch what adam schiff had to say. >> it's clear from the filing that michael cohen in the preparation of his false testimony to congress circulated that among people affiliated with the administration in the white house. that may go to the obstruction of justice issue. >> so if we, from our reporting and others, have known that this is now taking place or had taken place, which white house staffer should be worried, do you think? >> well, there are a number of different white house staffers that have tried to distance themselves from this investigation and have tried to say we're not talking about the mueller probe. we refer you to the president's outside counsel. clearly from these documents it shows that several white house officials have been involved in this process, whether speaking to manafort and his legal team through an intermediary, or speaking to cohen and trying to figure out how to coordinate the messaging. it definitely appears that michael cohen was trying to provide some cover for the white house when he made his first initial statements that he now say

here's what adam green, founder of progressive change campaign committee writes. he says democrats need to put a bright north star in the sky for 2020 voters showing what democrats would do with more power and making clear we're moving toward medicare far all as a big part of 2020 electoral strategy. it's clear the presidential nominee will support medicare for all. do you think it's time for democrats to push this? >> look, democrats are for universal access to health care, one end of the party to the other. we want more people covered, everyone covered, better health care at a lower cost. many are for medicare for all. some or for medicare buy-in, some over 55, some are public option. we're going to have to do a lot more on health care. it will be a major issue in 2020, and i believe democrats will coalesce around the best way to get the best health care for the most people. >> where are you? do you think you should spend more time fixing the affordable care act or launching a new health care proposal? >> we first have to do undo this awful decision because, look

who apparently has lied multiple times, if you can read between the lines of what adam schiff is sayingsee an indictment coming for him a while. really the question is how much does mueller have that will tie corsi to wikileaks and roger stone back to trump? that's the links that puts him in the collusion camp. now, i think there is plenty on the construction camp already. >> your paper you work for is great, david the paper's point out the fact there was a complete loop there. it went right 4r50u from corsi to roger stone to the president the candidate, he became president. >> that they knew all about the hacking. the russian hacking. >> so mueller has to sew these remaining loops. but i think this week was crucial in that this investigation went to new places. it went to donald trump's personal finances, his personal financial stake in russia. it went as jennifer suggests to his family. it went to the core of his narrative. he's been saying for go years, this is a witch hunt. this is all made up. and this week you saw facts that basically begin to blow up that nar narrative. i felt th

guess she missed -- she did that for a while and she was on a path that might have made her one of what adamayton powell used to call the zarinas who ran harlem society. always in the newspaper and at this party or that gala and that was the path she was on. and earlier on it scared her. that wasn't the life she wanted and would have again on writing and state on the path and i have no idea how successful she was, published a lot of short stores and essays and reviews but who knows houston how that would 0, but decided to go to law school she went to fordham law school and if you look at law schools at the time, most of the big law schools only admitted men at the time and quite few of them had color bar but by no means all of them. and the catholic law schools, called the women's law schools, that were created for a while at the time, tried to take up the slack. and the -- harvard tried to shut down the women's law schools in this area to give you one example. the catholic law schools generally were coeducational they had a particular mission to immigrants, to people of color, and to jewish

here is what adam green, founder of progressive change campaign writes. he says democrats need to put a bright north star in the sky for 2020 voters to make clear that we're moving toward medicare for all as a big part of a 2020 electoral strategy. it seems pretty clear the presidential nominee, whoever it is will support medicare for all. do you think it's time for democrats to push this? >> look, democrats are for universal access to health care, from one end of the party to the other. we want more people covered, everyone covered. we want better health care at a lower cost. people have different views as to how to get there. many are for medicare for all. some are for medicare buy in and some are over 55, some are medicaid buy in, some are public option. we have to do a lot more on health care. it will be a major issue in 2020 and i believe democrats will get the best health care for the most people. >> where are you? do you think you should spend proposal? >> we have to undo the decision. we have a republican president and senate. they spent a lot of

well, it came from what adam smith calls the obvious and simple plan, the liberal plan of equality, liberty, and justice. i wish he meant equality of social standing, the kind of respect that all americans accord to each other or should. liberty to open the hair dressing salon or invent the internet, and equal justice before the law. it's an egalitarian proposition, this liberalism, and here i want to quarrel with some of you in the audience who might be traditional conservative, who don't believe in equality. i don't believe in what i call a friend style e -- a french style equality, who bestows equality after the event, cutting down poppies but i believe in equality in the sense that adam smith spoke of. equal rights to open, equal rights to venture. so, at age 26, certainly by 76, you're supposed to know this kind of thing. supposed to know that social jim has not historically worked, there are sound reasons, that it doesn't work, even though it works in small societies, among friend, you're dividing up a pizza, with the obnoxious is your so cold friends said i paid nor pizza i should ge

. >> senator susan collins didn't want to bite on what adam schiff was telling the new yorker and thesident's businesses and whether he's shaping policy to an advantage of his business. >> the business is the family too which is more of the red line. the trump organization has been the trump family. there hasn't been any separation between him and his children. the democrats don't see any of this as off limits. as peter said, there's a fear on the part of some democrats they may go too far. and appear to be only on a partisan crusade. the democratic leadership is doing a lot to make plans to organize between the different committees to see which hearings come first, which investigations proceed first, who handles what. they're very concerned to try to create an image that what they're doing is accountability and not as the republicans see it, presidential harassment. >> the biggest issue for mulvaney and his party is you have a liar in the office. you have a man who lies about lying. i'm laughing this week at them attacking cohen for saying he's a liar. it's like john gotti saying you

what? the adams. >> yes.o honor the fallen president that is his father. >> we're looking at a picture again from theapol rotunda as the dignitaries begin to file out. and as we have already said. there are opportunities for the public to gon a pay their ts resp >> yes. and today, one good thing for e family was they had beautiful weather. the public has tomorrow to be paying its respects before the funeral on wednesday. we know a lot of people areca wondering e they'll be standing in line. what do they have in store? >> much colder weather. it does look like things will be okay weatherwise. as far as sunshine, much colder. we saw everybody lining up across the street as the presidt drove, was driven through.mp teatures, 62 degrees. very nice across o region. 60s to the south. 65 degrees. ght now, a little on the cooler side. down to 54 degrees. now down 51 with winds outf the north at 15 miles an hour. the winds gusting at 20 to 30 miles an hour. bringing in the colder air. we were in the 50s to 60s. we're a

what is ideology? adamsays science is non-coppice -- what he says is its the delusion because you can imagine something in your mind, it's possible in the world. this is the delusion that leads to the guillotine and a firing squad, okay? he believes everyone comes into the world as equal in terms of human beings with rights, but they come with fundamentally different abilities, with different opportunities and, of course, that's true and that's going to lead in a way that jefferson can't anticipate to aristocracy of wealth. because the americans don't have natural aristocracy in the way that britain and europe does, the american aristocrats the will be a plutocracy. of it will take over the government and once that happens it will be difficult to dislodge it. guess what. we are there again. he doesn't have an answer his answers are curious. you have all the aristocrats in the senate. they will be ostracized there he said. that's when they have power, for god's sake. but he says one thing is not an answer, w

adam? >> i actually go back to what christina was saying. i think she's right. i think what is remarkable how confident the american consumer has been. the american consumer has been confident. they like tax cuts, regulatory moves and haven't paid too much attention to the chaotic political situation in washington. the.i'm building to, there is potential next 12 months for all those factors to go in the opposite direction with a slowing global economy. i think there is every reason to believe we may be heading toward a recession. consumers are understanding that. beginning to demonstrate more and more. >> i want to add to that, consumer sales, what are we doing? using credit cards to buy those goods. looking at corporate debt. that is climbing higher. if you have interest rates, even though a slowdown in 2019. you could start to see default in 2019. i don't necessarily think recession is on the cards for 2019. definitely a slowdown i would contradict from michelle, we could continue this bull market. not saying that we need to say the word recession but there ar

question and i want to go through you quickly on this and we'll move to audience questions here what adam said about the trump legacy is 15 years from now we will be judged on whether or not we were able to create a new way to interact with china. it's a very interesting phrase. it probably wasn't the answer i was expecting, but dr. morel, you mentioned china and not north korea, and general mcmaster, you've been quite vocal about the chinese government and what a relationship should and should not be with them in terms of technology and information sharing, et cetera. is he right? 15 years from now, with how well they do perhaps on the trade deal they're negotiating at the moment, whether or not they can make gains in intellectual property and get that under control for the future and perhaps 15 years from now if you stabilize that relationship around this time that the legacy of this administration will be judged on that. what do you think? >> do you want to go first? >> please. >> we shouldn't care as much about the relationship as we do about interests vis-a-vis china and our interest

that's what kicked it all off. adamsould say, no, we started at in massachusetts, it was the boston massacre. they had a feud on the origins of the american revolution. but we have been slow to not just have white male history, but times are changing. they started changing in the 1960's and continuing. president barack obama during his years as president created stonewall national monument, part of the lgbt people, harry tubman in new york -- harriet tubman in new york, the great leader out in california, charles young, african-american soldier, national monument in ohio, native american bears ears, turning land over to tribes. we're trying to open up the mosaic of the american story. we have a long way to go but we are teaching native american history. maybe not enough. i have been angry at my state of texas trying to get helen keller out of the history books. it annoys me to no end. if i had more time i would write an op-ed. i don't like when i see people going backwards. i think we are doing that, we are at a better p

. >> what about, susan, what congressman adam schiff said.f course, he's expected to be the intel committee chair come january. take a listen to this. >> the president continues to dangle a pardon for paul manafort which only adds to the growing body of evidence that the president is engaged in obstructing justice. >> so he right there suggesting a pardon is evidence of obstruction. what about cohen's regular contact with trump's legal team when crafting a false statement to congress? does that potentially put the president in peril? >> it could, and one thing that comes to mind is that white house counsel mcgahn spent 30 hours with mueller's team. and i think that there could be some real significant issues there as far as what he knew when it came to the president's relationship with comey, the president's relationship with the russia deal, if there was anything that was coming out. maybe he knew about it. so i would be very concerned about those 30 hours. >> let's take a listen to senator brasso this morning. he's pretty much echoing the s

adam: what are we working on? >> photo op. snowman. bout half an hour. adam: you do this all the time for events. i see that and say that's going to melt in two seconds. >> it could last almost a day out hire. adam: what about indoors? >> it's going to melt a lot quicker. adam: fortunately, we have kind of chilly temperatures. should i do the forecast from in here? all right. well, can we bring up the maps? let's bring up the maps. i feel like a fool and need to bring myself up hire. it's going to be talking about rain on and off the coast. most of the snow we are talking about today is a little bit farther inland. here is what you are looking at. snow inland new york. upstate new york running up into new england really the only large system as far as a white christmas goes that's going to be happening out west. snow running from california and back up into the northwest otherwise i think the middle of the country guys, if you are traveling things are looking all right. i will toss this back in. get back down in my snowman. we have more

what is britain's future still hangs in the air. let's get more reaction to the day's events and tonight's vote. in a moment we'll talk to our europe correspondent adamditor simonjack in the city of london. simon, what is the reaction in the markets to not just simon, what is the reaction in the markets to notjust the day's events which were rather turbulent but the outcome of the vote itself? groups are saying this was pointless and unwelcome. my favourite comment was it was a chaotic detours. it feels a bit like this in a sense that you are in a car chase and one of the cars goes off the road and into a barn are lots of chickens squawk out of the windows. you get back on the road and you find out you are where you were when you started. there is political nuance for this but that is the way they see it. business confidence is still shredded. the canary in the business coal mine the pound rallied today on news that mps would come out and support her. there is an old adage in the city, and the pound began to wea ken in the city, and the pound began to weaken a bit. this misses do not feel it as a springboard for more confidence. they have a deal that

adam decided this was what he could control. he could control his articles of clothing, his canteen. this was his way of saying, i have some control over my own destiny. >> okay. can i do something without you getting upset? >> what's that? >> these socks. i'm not really sure why i did it. i just thought, well, what would happen if i did move your socks? you're in prison. you're in danger every day. how long can you leave these socks like that? >> i don't like that at all. >> i'm not exactly sure why i decided to challenge adam. i think i was just trying to make him see that whether his socks were here or folded this way or that way, it wasn't really going to alter his life, so again i picked up one of the t-shirts and kind of put it down haphazardly. how about this? >> yeah, that's not cool either. >> why? >> the label needs to be facing up. >> why? you know it's your shirt. you know your name. >> it just does. i don't know. it's like i couldn't explain why i have empty boxes in there, either. i just need to have them because i

you look back in history, you look at the 1850s, what abraham lincoln was talking about. he was adamant about going back to what in our deck la roigs rai rati declaration ofrsuit of happiness. independence. recognize god-given rights to life, libber itty, the pursuit of happiness. he said go back to the declaration. notion of government of the people, by the people, for the people. here we have washington, d.c., who seems to have this super regulatory state that wants to micromanage every single aspect of american life. deciding who gets a mortgage. deciding what's going to be in your health care plan. deciding what kind of energy you're going to use. look, this is a big country and you have to allow the american people to make a lot of these decisions. >> tampa, florida, is up next. phillip, republican. good morning. >> caller: yes. the congressman stated earlier that he felt like his district was, i guess, illegally or unconstitutionally redistricted. could he elaborate on that statement that he made a little earlier? and on that point, i'd also like to know what's the path ahead for