yesterday, whelan let loose with his theory.& friends" rolled it out to their audience. >> he looked at what christine ford told "the washington post" and figured out, okay, these people were named, these four people, where did they live? and looked at what she had said and figured out what house it may have happened at because it was the house closest to the golf course and then realized whose house it was and then looked at the picture of the young man who lived there at the time, who was a classmate of mr. kavanaugh's. put up side by side, they looked a lot alike. >> again, today, whelan took down the tweets and apologized. then politico reported an outfit called crc public relations advised him on how to hype the theory. they also reported judge kavanaugh was not aware of what his friend ed was doing on his own behalf. according to the "washington post" kavanaugh and his allies, unspecified allies, have privately discussed mounting a defense along the lines of the whelan tweets, namely whether or not the incident happened bu

development for recreation whelan's or lost and what's critical and what this report puts the spotlight on is if we citizens policymakers and business better understand the multiple benefits that wetlands and provide will be able to make better decisions as to how we use these lands and we will reduce the conversion or the loss of these lands for alternative uses as i mentioned such as agriculture urban development industry and so forth and certainly hope that you know more focus is put on this subject as part of a more general on climate change say al this from the rams are a secretary at so i thank you for sharing your views with us thank you and still ahead on the news hour from california startup to global corporations selling insights into all of our lives we search back through twenty years of google and in sports have veteran american player fires a warning shot to the europeans on the eve of golf's biggest team tournament show's going to have the latest on the vita culch. business updates. the. business. model.

whelan is a lawyer. he should be reported to the bar.y professional consequences. so this is absolutely reprehensible. it does deserve to be investigated. when kavanaugh comes before the judicial committee next week he has to be questioned about it. but i want to make a point, even if he is confirmed, the failure to investigate now will stay as a cloud over the supreme court. what if the maryland police after he's confirmed finds something? what if the fbi or the democrats who are going to take over the house find kavanaugh did know about this, we then have a complete mess. potential impeachment hearings potential impeachment of a supreme court justice. they cannot risk putting someone on the supreme court who is a ticking time bomb. this is the republican's furious rush to judgment, but it's going to leave a permanent stain. judge kavanaugh, soon to be justice kavanaugh if you believe the republicans, is going to have the prospect of being revealed or having a lie exposed after he is on the supreme court. this is completely intolerable.

and public policy center's ed whelan will join us to talk about judge kavanaugh's judicial policy. be sure to watch washington journal five at 7:00 a.m. eastern on wednesday morning. join the discussion. the c-span bus is traveling across the country on our 50 capitals to her visiting all 50 state capitals. the summer the bus left the mainland and traveled by ferry to juneau, alaska and honolulu, hawaii. join us as we feature our 40th bus stop in des moines, iowa. life monday on washington journal with our guest i was senate president charles schneider. >> national intelligence director dan coats discussed threats to the us today including concerns about countries to which he refers to as the big four. russia, china, iran and north korea. this is about 25 minutes. [applause] >> our mission is to meet intelligence integration and forge an intelligence community that delivers the most insightful, intelligent possible. this is the mission statement of the office of national intelligence. integrating the incredible capabilities of the 17 elements of the us intelligence community and fo

case was mr.at whelan.-- trying to blame anybody. i want to know who the common friend. >> the person that mr. whelan was trying to say look like mr. cavanaugh. >> how long did you know this person? a couple of months we socialize. p also was a member of the same country club. i knew his younger brother as well. >> a couple months before this took place. >> yes. >> how would you characterize your relationship with him before and after this? somebody -- i went out with. i would not say date. that is how we termed it at the moment. after that we were distant friends and ran into each other periodically. i didn't see him often. i saw his brother and him several times. >> was this the only common link between you and judge kavanaugh? >> the only one i would be able to name right now. you know who i mean. there are other members of columbia country club that were common friends are more acquaintances of mine and friends of mr. cavanaugh. >> ok. can you describe the other social interactions you had with mr. cavanaugh? >> briefly i can. du

ed whelan is head of an organization that falsely calls itself the ethics and public policy center. and he's obviously a morally bankrupt ethically vacant human being. but he works closely on supreme court confirmations. and the most interesting part of ed whelan's perverse theory of the case is that he completely accepts the idea that dr. ford was sexually assaulted, it just wasn't brett kavanaugh. that tells you that the republican machinery that is working overtime to defend brett kavanaugh is expecting dr. ford to be so convincing a witness that the only two defenses in the end might be mistaken identity or as donald trump says, just wasn't that bad. republicans have no intention of offering dr. ford a fair hearing. fair is out of the question. the question is only how unfair will it be? it's going to be so unfair that the republican leader of the senate today said he already has the votes for the confirmation of brett kavanaugh. it's a done deal. >> you've watched the fight, you've watched the tactics, but here's what i want to tell you. in the very near future judge kavanaugh

ed whelan is not a random guy off the street. he is a pillar at the washington legal establishment. friend of brett kavanaugh. he is confirmed in getting brett kavanaugh confirmed. brett kavanaugh needs to go under oath. did he know about this smear attack? he needs to withdraw immediately. >> that would be disqualifying in and of itself. >> is it appropriate what whelan did, putting out the name of somebody else? >> hes a apologized. he should not put the name and picture out as he did. for the same reason i'm frustrated the democrats leaked dr. ford's allegations. >> you are leaking -- this is disgusting what they're doing. >> i'm saying it's all so wrong. >> there is no comparison about this. the democrats did not leak dr. ford's name. she came on on sunday. >> somebody leaked it the democratic congressman and for. >> they did not leak her name. she came out on sunday. okay. >> someone, it was only the democrats and her that had the story. >> i am watching a report in the washington post that ed whelan knew her name before it was paid public. that's something that needs to be inv

whelan who was looking not be linked in page and then trying to blame the person. i just don't think it's right for us to be talking about that. i'm not trying to blameon anybo. i just want to know who the common friend is. >> the person who mr. whelan was trying to say but like mr. kavanaugh. >> how long did you know this person? >> may be for a couple of months are socialized in a bid he also was a member of the same country club and i knew his younger brother as well. >> okay. so a couple of months before this took place? >> yes. >> okay. >> how would you characterize your relationship with him both before and after this took place? >> he was somebody that we use the phrase i went out with. i would a date. went out with for a few months. that's how we turned it at the time. after that, we were distant friend andth ran it to each othr periodically at columbia country club. but i didn't see him often. i saw his brother and him several times. was this person the only common link between view and judge kavanaugh? >> he's the only one that i would be able to namecoon

kavanaugh's confirmation hearing the alliance for justices and ethics and public policy center's ed whelan will join us to talk about judge kavanaugh's judicial policy. be sure to watch washington journal five at 7:00 a.m. eastern on wednesday morning. join the discussion. the c-span bus is traveling across the country on our 50 capitals to her visiting all 50 state capitals. the summer the bus left the mainland and traveled by ferry to juneau, alaska and honolulu, hawaii. join us as we feature our 40th bus stop in des moines, iowa. life monday on washington journal with our guest i was senate president charles schneider. >> national intelligence director dan coats discussed threats to the us today including concerns about countries to which he refers to as the big four. russia, china, iran and north korea. this is about 25 minutes.

host: ed whelan?: he will patrol the waivers any other precedent. justice that's ever taken the position -- he will approach roe v. wade like any other precedent. justice approaches this in a responsible way, and everything about his record maintains he will do that. talks aboutaron this report that was put out, even before the nomination was made she declared she would oppose whoever the nominee was. had he respond to dianne feinstein yesterday in her opening statement said the question is not rather roe v. wade is settled law, the question is is the law correct? guest: i think senator feinstein does not understand how it operates. anytime you address a question, your beginning proposition is that the case has been wrongly decided, if it's rightly decided of course it should be maintained. every justice recognizes with multi factor test. host: could you explain it? guest: this is the principle that you are always using shorthand to talk about respect for precedent. theas never been absolute, court ha

on day two of brett kavanaugh's confirmation hearing, the alliance for justices than aaron and ed whelan will join us to discuss his judicial philosophy. be sure to join us at 7:00 eastern this morning. join the discussion. live wednesday on the c-span network, the u.s. house returned to 10 a.m. eastern on c-span to take up u.s. embassy security and sanctions on state sponsors of cyber attacks against the u.s.. at 10 a.m. on c-span to come at eightnate discusses judicial nomination. on c-span3, at 9:30 a.m. the second day of the supreme court hearing for brett kavanaugh. sunday night on afterwords, on his book. makedon't know if voters the connection between what politicians do and what happens in schools. how do we draw that line a little more clearly? understandvoters to if we want more access to pre-k or pay our teachers better. if you want to make college more affordable, we have to get there by challenging and holding accountable our elected officials who we put in office. >> watch a sunday night at 9:00 eastern on book tv. >> on the first day of confirmation hearings for supreme co

as he got a big old slice of the forty fourth minute when joe whelan told him hammered away the one of them that it's not star i was different from the football we're playing is really beautiful. were dangerous on goal quick paced and breaking into their penalty box but we can't score they were doing everything we can so we're modest of a tune. but the meticulous worker never rests because they know that hard work pays off in the end. i was the be even if i am in the churches two mil was later withdrawn she was offsides. way you think you're up to nil and then there's a massive blow cause it's great for one side and totally sucks for the other ships and knuckles man's not afraid to say what he thinks and that's why we like him. that and his were fresh ing style of play it's fast and to the point. it hasn't always come off this season but in dortmund it works nicely. though it was once again offsides i. was in high demand this offseason top and biron and even madrid courted him he decided to go to my sake next year he can continue to develop as a coach at hoffenheim and focus on what's

whelan ceja was killed in san pablo in 1993. those killings went unsolved until huff's dna was linked to both of the cases. >> so grateful this is over. i'm glad he's never going to be out here again. >> huff did not address the court during yesterday's sentencing and he did not look at anyone as they were speaking. >>> oakland police say they were forced to use a taser on a man they say came to the home of his ex-girlfriend with a loaded gun. the confrontation happened about 10:00 yesterday morning near 89th avenue. and b st. officers try to calm the man down but there was a struggle . the two officers tased the suspect and then were able to restrain him. he was arrested on suspicion of battery on a police officer in possession of a gun . the a woman and her two-month-old sons were not hurt and oakland police department spokeswoman says the officers de-escalated a volatile situation without having to resort to deadly force . the officers were injured, but were treated and released at the hospital. >>> top social media executive

wednesday morning, on the second day of brett kavanaugh's , nan aron and ed whelan. watch washington journal, live at 7 a.m. eastern wednesday morning. live wednesday on the c-span network, the u.s. house returns to10 a.m. eastern on c-span talk about cyber attacks against the united states. c-span2, the senate considers eight district court nominations. ofc-span3, the second day confirmation hearings for brett kavanaugh at 9:30 a.m. announcer: the c-span bus is traveling across the country on the 50 capital store -- capitals tour. join us as we feature our 40th bus stop in des moines, iowa, live on monday with washington journal, with senate president charles schneider. >> next, the national intelligence director on threats to the united states. he addressed what he referred to as the big four, russia, china, iran, and north korea. this 25 minute speech was hosted by the intelligence and national security alliance into the armed forces in electronics association. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2018] [applause] letitia:

ed whelan, thank you very much.with us at fox news channel all week as the senate begins confirmation hearings for judge kavanaugh. mike: the white house counsel is leaving the administration. why now? and what does the departure mean for the russia probe? our next guest, the deputy assistant attorney general shares his thoughts. the president renews his attacks on canada over trade. president trump: canada is ripping us off. the whole world is ripping us off. pen to sign up for new insurance instead? for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise their rates because of their first accident. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ . . . if you're 65 or older, even if you're healthy, you may be at increased risk for pneumococcal pneumonia -a potentially serious bacterial lung disease that can disrupt your routine for weeks. in severe cases, pneumococcal pneumonia can put you in the hospital. it can hit quickly, without warning, making you miss out on what matters most. a single dose of the prevnar

it is very reminiscent of a story we heard very similar to this one just last week when ed whelan blamedr guy for committing the assault. >> what man would come forward and potentially expose himself to this kind of criminal accusations? there's so much we don't know. >> we don't know what to make of it. a lot of allegations that were redacted on twitter, seems like that. my understanding is, 1982 the statute of limitations would have passed but who knows? we have to wait until maybe tomorrow to learn a little more. >> they will ask her, they will ask doctor blasey-ford about this and i assume she will have a measured, credible answer. shannon: it goes to whether she is remembering correctly. >> if this is a sworn statement from this man it will be interesting developments to see how she reacts, we are all looking forward to hearing from her and you heard from polygraph expert we had with her and his account of what she told him, he talked to her, the committee hasn't. let's talk about what we expect tomorrow. this is what senator kennedy was a member of the committee said about how this

. >>> a woman is in jail accused of being involved in two total attacks. 24-year-old cindy whelan is with murdering a man at a hayward motel in july 2017. she is also reportedly the same person accused of stabbing a newspaper reporter 10 days earlier in san jose. he suffered severe injuries in last year's attack which police say took lace during a robbery attempt. dna evidence link the suspect to both crimes. three santa clara county supervisors have approved a no drone zone to keep them out of airspace above wildfires and jails. the ordinance comes just a week santa clara sheriff lori smithe potentially drop their the peri in one case methamphetamines were found. smith says she is looking into the technology to either intercept or block drones in the future. >> this is a great first step. it will keep the everyday person away from doing its, potentially. i think we need to use technology get to technology in this case >> under the ordinance anyone caught flying in the no drone zone will face misdemeanor charges. a potential fine and risk having their drones confiscated. >>> i want t

. >> jessica: like ed whelan did when he went on a tweet storm last night saying that brett kavanaugh couldn't have done it because he pulled up some floor plans and he put the blame on brett kavanaugh's classmate who had been supportive of kavanaugh and also was clearly close with dr. ford. >> dagen: this is a distraction and i want to say one thing, the fact that democrats are trying to act like we are the party women, somebody was a democrat like this woman's name. >> harris: are you looking for the name? >> dagen: and by the way, they are using this woman and her reputation as a battering ram. they are not standing up for her and the right to women. they are standing up for their own backside. >> jessica: i don't think that's fair. >> melissa: it is fair, she didn't want to come forward. >> jessica: i hope that it wasn't senator feinstein herself that weakness. >> harris: i hadn't heard that. >> jessica: that would be a complete violation of what dr. ford had asked. >> harris: we just put this out there in terms of being a democrat. if dianne feinstein has been around for a long t

, now we learn tonight there has been the whole side effort to smear her character by this guy ed whelanrently affiliated with judge kavanaugh and says he's not coordinating, but what he's done is create this false story that she's mixed up and that she's obviously means some other person he was treat e tweeting about today. we learned he found out about her identification and her name before even the washington post story was out. so there is a whole lot of coordination going on the to smear her name before she even gets to to washington, d.c. >> the politics are embarrassing. the timing on the democratic side smells bad. i get the request for anonymity. it doesn't smell good. what is going on, on the other side smellss badly. too. ordinarily i would say what else is new. we need a change to the dynamic. however, this ain't normal politics. these times of situation versus to be handled with care. can the allegation be false? yep can it be faked, made up? yep. how do you know if you only hear from the he said and the she said in this situation? that's what i don't get nigel, that's what

, now we learn tonight there has been the whole side effort to smear her character by this guy ed whelanrently affiliated with judge kavanaugh and says he's not coordinating, but what he's done is korea it this false story that she's mixed up and that she's obviously means some other person he was treat e tweeting about today. we learned he found out about her identification and her name before even the washington post story was out. so there is a whole lot of coordination going on the to smear her name before she even gets to to washington, d.c. >> the politics are embarrassing. the timing on the democratic side smells bad. i get the request for anonymity. it doesn't smell good. what is going on, on the other side smellss badly. too. ord narl i would say what else is new? we need a change to the dynamic. however, this ain't normal politics. these times of situation versus to be handled with care. can the allegation be false? up. can it be faked, made up? up. how do you know if you only hear from the he said and the she said in this situation? that's what i don't get nigel, that's what i

teenagers 36 years ago specifically if there was any knowledge by justify kavanaugh about the ed whelanschoolteacher was smeared and publicly identified as the person who possibly did that, if that was a coordinated strategy -- i'm not suggest fog a second that brett kavanaugh had any knowledge about it. i say this as someone who ran two of these, the nominees don't have much say in the political strategy, but if he knew, then i think that disqualifies and has to go down. at the end of the days this, collins and murkowski will be the two senators who determines whether he sits on the court or doesn't. >> the legacy of anita hill is appreciated by many, in part very limited, but powerful appearances. >>> i think that anita hill's appearance, if it had been in this time probably would have been the end of clarence thomas' nominati nomination. >>> and i think that you have different factors now. not only do you have the me too movement and women empowered, you also have a difference in terms of the allegation, because we are dealing with the race factor. you don't have that here. it's goin

>> it's very reminiscent of a story we heard very similar to this one, just last week, when ed whelanlamed some other guy for committing the assault. >> shannon: carrie, what man would come forward and expose themselves to this kind of criminal accusation? there are so much we don't know. >> we don't know what to make of it because without a lot of stuff to run, allegations being made earlier today, things like that. we have to be careful. my understanding is that i think, 1982, the statute of limitations would have passed on that. who knows. i think we have to wait to see. maybe tomorrow. hopefully we'll learn more. >> shannon: very interesting. >> one thing we do know, they will ask her, republicans will certainly ask dr. blasey ford about this and i assume she will have a very measured, credible answer. >> it goes to whether she is rubber again correctly, which is the crux. >> shannon: if this is a sworn statement and whether his name goes public, it will be interesting development to see how she react to this. i think we are looking forward to hearing from her. you heard from the

wednesday morning, on day two of brett kavanaugh's confirmation hearing, the alliance for aron and edn whelan will join us to talk about policy. join the discussion. live wednesday on the the u.s. house returns at 10:00 a.m. eastern on c-span to take up u.s. embassy security and sanctions on state sponsors of cyber attacks against the u.s. at 10:00 a.m. on c-span2, the senate considers eight district court nominations. a.m., it ist 9:30 the second day of the confirmation hearing for brett kavanaugh. that is some of our related coverage wednesday -- our live coverage wednesday. announcer: sunday night on after words, arne duncan on his book, "how schools work." formernterviewed by the chancellor of the district of columbia public schools. >> i do not know if voters make the connection between what politicians do and what happens in school. how do we draw that line more clearly? >> we need voters to understand if we want more access to pre-k, losses,nt to reduce job if we want to make college more affordable, we have to get there by holding accountable our elected officials who we put in office

whelan for seven minutes. >> thank you much mr. judge swango for coming and certainly, mr.beuze, you appeared before a committee communications and thank you for the international perspective you have provided. you spoke a little bit about reduction from last year to this year and the overall percentages of number of international refugees that canada seeks, seeks to help, as compared to our other western counterparts. you find that canada is doing aa good job at managing its international obligations and libya to those international obligations, not just overseas but at our quÉbec and manitoba borders? >> two points it definitely canada is upholding the standard of the convention by allowing people arriving through irregular means to launch a claim before the irb. may i i just say that over 18 months of observation, i will differ with the point which was made the people are not taking the risk to their crossing. 96% across the rocks in road and a number -- a little ditch was filled with stone and nobody can even in the winter is taking any risk whatsoever for the life. in

whelan. adjourn -- i moved to adjourn debate. a motion to has chair debate on that.t is not debatable. all in favor. opposed? there's only three votes on the conservative side just to remind, one of you can't quote. you decide. but that motion is passed so we adjourn debate on that motion. >> inaudible. >> you have 12 seconds. >> thank you. which of like to like theer, would you committee to provide a report on this particular issue after appearing here entering all of these participants and the testimony? >> ms. kwan. thank you very much, mr. chair. i think they minister at all the witnesses about here before us. i think it was unfortunate for the liberal members to adjourn their debate on simply calling for the committee after this study to take a report and get a response that the government. we are in the situation having a summer session, emergency city on this issue here because the liberals on five occasions last year voted to adjourn my motion to call for a study on this very issue. had we done that we might be having this conversation today. we might have a

brett kavanaugh's coverage hearing the alliance for justices and ethics and public policy center's ed whelan will join us to talk about judge kavanaugh's judicial philosophy. be sure to watch the fans washington journal light at 7:0y morning. join the discussion. >> both bodies of congress returned today and in the senate the judiciary committee held the first day of what is affected to be a weeklong confirmation hearing for supreme court nominee, brett kavanaugh. next, we will show you the hearing in its entirety including the protest which kicked off the hearing. ... [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [laughter] [inaudible conversat [inaudible conversations] >> good morning. we welcome everyone to this confirmation hearing on the nomination of brett cavanaugh. >> mr. chairman. >> mr. chairman i would like to be recognized before we .roceed >> i would like to ask a question that committee received last night 10000 pages of documents we have not had an opportunity to review or read our analyze. >> you are out of order i will proceed. >> we cannot mo

ed whelan, national review, latest document from the catholic charity ceo, someone that judge kavanaugh has worked closel with. i know he's a man committed to his community and those less fortunate. catholic youth organization -- add, i coached my kids and i actually think the parents are the toughest constituency tore get support fm and you apparently have done not to that effect. also, a letter from the charleston post and courier editorial bold, kavanaugh the right choice. next to toxic, give brett kavanaugh a shot. from william whitaker, the president of the washington jesuit academy allotting judge kavanaugh for the past several years. for my former colleagues in the house, a letter from the majority of the house and senate supporting brad kavanaugh's nomination. from my lieutenant governor and finally, letter from the dojth dated august 8th, 2005 in response to senator joe biden at the times request for justice roberts information. i think it's a very interestingg read. before i make some comments and hope to keep the record of lies. >> wait a minute -- without objection so ordere