this, whenwer adds it comes to this tax, it will only be paid by the poorest consumers. guest: the u.s. department of treasury found that 70% of american families would win a commendably -- economically under this plan. the lower you are on the income scale, the more you get. it is not a tax on the wealthy. it's simply because low income americans have a lower carbon footprint. michael talking about this, this program creates a new arrangement that collects his taxes and sends dollars in a political game, and this quickly becomes entitlements, and the program simply adds new taxes to our existing code. guest: there are three ways to solve the problem could many of the proposals put forth by democrats have very high price tags. what that means is your taxes would go up or the deficits would go up. our plan is revenue neutral. it would know go to the side of the government. it would shrink the size of the government because it does away with regulations unnecessary once you have a meaningful carbon price. that's why this is a conservative solution and the original co-autho

this, whenwer adds it comes to this tax, it will only be paid by the poorest consumers.: the u.s. department of treasury found that 70% of american families would win a commendably -- economically under this plan. the lower you are on the income scale, the more you get. it is not a tax on the wealthy. it's simply because low income americans have a lower carbon footprint. michael talking about this, this program creates a new arrangement that collects his taxes and sends dollars in a political game, and this quickly becomes entitlements, and the program simply adds new taxes to our existing code. guest: there are three ways to solve the problem could many of the proposals put forth by democrats have very high price tags. what that means is your taxes would go up or the deficits would go up. our plan is revenue neutral. it would know go to the side of the government. it would shrink the size of the government because it does away with regulations unnecessary once you have a meaningful carbon price. that's why this is a conservative solution and the original co-authors are

shock whenwere in donald trump was declared the winner of the 2016 election. ouround democrats and democratic party in pieces. we had a bruising family part -- family fight in this party. our organizers and volunteers were disillusioned. 99iowa alone, half of our county chairs turned over that year. any counties, including our own county party here in polk, were basically bankrupt. all we could do was band together. when trump proposed his muslim ban, we rallied at the airport. when trump had his bizarre inaugural, the women of america marched in response. our meeting swelled. it is still 125 people at least. taught us the hard lesson that elections and voting are just as important as we democrats always said they were. without donald trump, it could have been years before we saw women, people of color, and young people standing up for the leadership positions and the party they deserve. in 2018, in polk county alone, half of our nominees for office were women for the first time ever. without donald trump, we would not have 17 of the brightest democrats in the