is whenyou are saying it said only look at jumper cables, it meant look at anything. your sworn testimony today is they looked at all cables. further. a little need-- you a $1.2 billion. >> we need another $300 million government.eral >> you are saying an increase of 300 million dollars. why would only come from the federal government? is that which autonomy? >> the federal government is the fourth partner that pays zero. >> when we originally put in the system, we were more than a full partner. , the federal government pay two thirds of the cost to build the system. on the offering side, they have not contribute her, and never did. really and dollars? let me make sure i understand this. your plan to fix the system is wmata $18 billion, close down the system for six months in order to have a good system. is that it? plan. that is not my >> you were quoted as saying close it down for six months. when i heard that, i could think of traffic jams for six months. it did not sit well for me. >> if you want me to come good news, ie you can do that, but if you want to know wh

you have to understand whenyou let the genie out of the bottle , what you have done is made cyber warfare dealing with your adversaries. it's not going to be very impressive for the us government to take the position that you can't do that to thus. we did it to someone else firs . now, it was effective in delaying the iranian nuclear program or a year and a half, two years but it did open that particularpandora's box . >> host: here's the book, lights out: cyber attack. a nation unprepared. surviving the aftermath. the author, ted koppel. >> and the senate just gambling back in a couple of seconds ago, ready to work on the date for federal energy and water project. that bill that sets ending on this project for 2017. a number of amendments pending. others will vote on one of those this afternoon at 5:30 eastern.

i think when think whenyou are one of those people it's facing a hard to navigate healthcare system then at least i know i have a phone call that i know i can make and they will at least review my case. i think that would be an excellenttool for those who feel like they're not being heard and they have a place to go. >>thank you for your comment. other public comments? >>herbert weimer. i'm having some difficulty with this. i have had lousy diagnosis from one doctor and finally it's clarified sometime laterwith a proper diagnosis and i realize that some doctors make a improper diagnosis and there's standing for bellicose. i wonder if the best doctors organization, couldn't be with the blue shield with the city health planner with kaiser. i wonder if this system over wraps somehow. i think this is very sound becausethere have been these diagnoses. i had a diagnosis that i would need to have a surgery but then i'd a 2nd opinion and they said that i would not need to do that and i've kept that doctor in because i like that evaluation. those that want it can have it those that do not want it