it publishes some extracts of the book that has been u.s., whichl in the has been noted. from baby jesus to baby george ofthat is on the front page this magazine this morning. >> so "rolling stone" magazine being talkedis about because of its cover. is in herouis dreyfus birthday student -- birthday constitution on her back. if you look at the bottom of the tattoo, you can see the signature john hancock. that is the word people use for a signature, but a lot of people point out that he did not actually sign the constitution, he signed the declaration of independence. so a lot of people are wondering was this done on purpose? " shese in the show "veep, plays kind of a bumbling vice president. so this is the kind of thing she would do. the publisher of "rolling stone two came out with a funny response -- "the declaration of independence is on the other side but we could not show that." said, "in my defense, i was actually in a drunken stupor," so -- but it is a fake tattoo. >> thank you. time now for sports. equalize shortly after her 4-2 in- the germans aggregate. also --

explain the huge consensus growing across the country against with secure communities and the oregon whichl court decision, ruled that local compliance is in violation of fourth amendment protections against unreasonable seizures. in california, the passing of the trust act. we're looking at massachusetts right now and the former d.h.s. head napolitano came out against one of the key components of obama's deportations? >> very quickly. i want to talk about 2014 and 2015 -- [inaudible] the line todown make closing comments. >> so i'll address the first two questions and let her answer the one. on the first question, the piece i want to talk about is the difference between prosecute yule discretion understood as prioritizing who is going to be versus what you were executive branch exercising their authority to enforce. that is a different understanding of the discretion of us are lawyers. i think constitutional scholars have written on both sides of that. how far the executive could go it is neverd that going to happen in congress. we're going to handle this as own.as we can on our in terms o

whichl part of alstom makes trains will be cleaved off from the energy business, which is financiallyhe company and would be acquired by ge. this is being done principally for political reasons. for obvious reasons, selling such an iconic french manufacturer to an american company would be very complicated in france. ge has come up with this structure where they get divided into two, with ge taking on the less sexy but more financially powerful arm. >> what is the french reaction? way of this is a nifty keeping outrage out. >> this structure will perhaps restrained some of the government pushed back to ge, which does have a very good reputation in france. we are already seeing headlines out of paris. the industry minister is an outspoken presence on any large m&a transaction in france. he said the government is concerned and looking for alternative solutions. he will be meeting with ge officials to discuss this. whether this is a real substantive pushback or whether the government is going through the motions of concern to try to get the best possible deal for france that they can, wh