so when we started out, you had seem like ed whitacre who was then the ceo of at&t saying things like no one can touch my pipes. we paid to build our network, and we should decide what happens on it even if that means discrimination, essentially. now you have companies like comcast, david cohn of comcast has said we think we're more committed to net neutrality than anyone. at&t just put out a blog post saying we completely agree we shouldn't discriminate en bloc, and we're putting some of that into our terms of service. so i think there's an emerging consensus that these values are important. and then we get down into the weeds about how to do it, and there's legitimate disagreements about what's going to happen, but that has to be the starting point. and i think while i share some of randy's views on this, i think the starting point of saying, well, we don't think anything bad has happened so, therefore, we shouldn't adopt anything is problematic. because once we lose the openness of the internet, if we move into an environment where it's closed, where it doesn't have that competitio