who? the ministry of education in such a way that, contrary to its desires and principles, it missed it. there are a lot of packs around for yegor creed’s schoolchildren’s lesson, that’s all for you, it will subscribe to those you subscribe to. i myself will receive my car. well, or money is a modern spectator, a modern person. quite rightly, one can say, well , what kind of nonsense is some kind of creed of something . so what, yes, as if nothing it seems to be and in fact, very much even what. because this is part of what they are trying to impose on us. something we've been talking about for years. but it's so mine so cracked under an adult. yes, to look at what is happening even now they are not for us, they say, to turn to the francoise to the portuguese to the italians to the british to the americans to turn the same. that's just some you guys, you yourself understand what's going on? you yourself see what a distortion of the idea of ​​the world and what is good or what is bad, how m

with that, i want to thank and i want to introduce a woman who i look up to, who i've watched grow and who i really admire and hope to be like one day. mayor breed, thank you. [cheers and applause] >> mayor london breed: thank you, thank you to urban alcamy. i'm filled with so much emotion here today because so many of the people that are joining us are people that i've interacted with at one capacity or another. whether it's something that i grew up or somebody i saw go through hard times. i know why people say that san francisco is a place of opportunity. a place of second chances, a place of hope and an opportunity to turn your life around to have a better future. and that's what today is about. because the fact is, the city with all of its open and all of its possibilities, it's also a political city. and politics are being played at some of the worse levels that i've ever seen. you know, the fact is, i know there are a lot of people that don't like that there is a black woman that grew up in the projects and is the mayor of san francisco. [applause] and so you often times have peo

and who is speaking? i am irish, he is proud of it . a jew, and the president of the united states an irishman. until recently , you could see there the ukrainian prime minister of france , petro beregov. well, this also speaks of how the world has changed, and i will say more, here we see this ukrainian emigration. its number will remain obvious and we will soon see in 20 years we will see the president of some ukrainian country, you know , or the prime minister, and there will be a lot because, according to the rules of the minority that comes in such difficult conditions, its main task is to climb the mountains, as it was already ukrainians were the heads of the state, the governor general of canada hnatyshyn is the head of the state when it was still the 90s of the 20th century, that is, it will be and so it will be normal for us to exist when the president of ukraine can be ethnic jews or crimean tatars or someone else and the president who will come to us from another country and shake the hand of t

who makes them passports, who helps them, who puts them on planes, who provides them with a pass to customss the control, and they all pass it. yes, maybe this is not a specific person who took the passport, looked and let maria pepper on the very plane with which she then flew away with navalny, but this is undoubted. uh, the existing connections and the people who are behind it all and who it is and who provide it. and of course uh, here is that dispute between us, uh, which i now consider, unfortunately, received such an extension. we just now, i think, have clearly realized that the former structure of navalny, it will not be engaged in political work. here it was absolutely right. but it has an excellent opportunity to recruit those people who will be the perpetrators of both terrorist acts and the perpetrators of some other actions that are the main direction of these actions. if earlier it was with a bulk attempt. uh, seize power move, uh into political some kind of struggle and thus seize power, now their ideas are completely different. they are not going to seize power in this way.

we, the people who are making the entertainment content, we are the ones who get the who who have no consolidation, who don't have the ability to act as a body. and so whenever they leave, whenever they leave, they lean on us. and typically that takes the form of these very baroque frauds. and the first half of this book is just detailing how these work. and the finance industry, there's an acronym for this. it's called mego. my eyes glaze over. so they build these these kind of baroque accounting schemes for taking money out of the pockets of creators. and they're just so complicated that nobody can figure them out. and we unwind them. we by chapter for the first half of the book we unwind them in a kind of john oliver jolly way of like, here's how this stuff works. and so you know, for example, the major record labels merged a monopoly. there's three major record labels, three major music publishers. the labels own the publishers. and so if you want to start a streaming company like spotify. you need to do a deal with those guys because it's 70% of the recorded music controlled by

male and who's female like. that's like the question that really me thinking and the thing that really got me going was like, how is it possible that someone, someone like me could be like, have an ever driver's license and an m on my birth certificate? and why is that? like, how that to be a situation like why would be an m for the purposes of a passport and an f for the purposes of marriage. back when there was a ban on same sex marriage. so this book kind of like tries to kind of come up with an alternative history of of transgender transgender people's legal situation. and it does that by like changing the protagonist instead of looking at trans people as and i'd certainly can i trans gender i okay what trans people i don't think great we suffer harm but instead of focusing on the harm transgender people suffer, i kind of try to understand the why. why do states have different policies for for different people or for different, you know, different criteria? one of the stories i tell in the book and one of th

traffickers who import that fentanyl into the u.s., the distributors who provide that fentanyl to drug dealers in the united states, the money launderers who fund the cartel'' massive fentanyl operations, and the cartel's armed soldiers who violently protect trafficking routes, laboratories, territory, and personnel who torture and murder. let me end with a message to every american who has been touched by this crisis. know this -- we are not going to give up. we are not going to forget. we are not going to turn the page and move on. we are not here to pat ourselves on the back. we are here to roll up our sleeves. we are going to do everything we can to seek justice and to hopefully save the next families from feeling tomorrow the pain you feel today. >> good morning. i'm maurice pasqual, and i'm the acting united states attorney for the northern district of illinois. the northern district of illinois' charges announced today are the latest in a series of indictments brought in chicago, san diego, and washington, d.c., against sinaloa cartel members and their associates. our offices al

people who speak out of turn, who spoke out of turn, who fought out of turn to build a nation.e from a long line of people who have resisted. i come from a long line of people who have fought injustice. i come from a long line of people who know what it means to face adversity and difficulty, who knows what it means to have words that mean something, that doesn't call peaceful protesters insurrectionists, doesn't call people who advocate for the end of gun violence, the folks who would actually kill law enforcement officers, talking about children and teens who are being persecuted by the words that we speak. i must say to you as i wrap up this portion, that we all have a responsibility. we all have an obligation to do what is just, to do what is right, and to do what is fair. so what i can promise to those of you who have cried today, those of you who mourn the seeming end and assault on our democracy, i can say to folks who are worried about if as one sign said, my next, what i can say to you is that the movement for justice can never die. because the hartford justice can nev

it is upper middle income whites, what they call people who have a who have a boat, who have an extra house, a beach house or something like that, who are still working class, you know. you contractors, professionals, things like. and they saw him as a tribal chief. and when you have a tribal chief, there's virtually nothing he can do or say so long as he is leading you in the direction that you want to go. and therefore, when he says something that's outrageous, well, they cheer because outrageous because they want to say it. and, you know what? you know what we call woke in the united states now, which the republicans are bandying about in the days this was called common decency and. but as barack when barack got elected president, the political lines in the united states shattered. yes. white union, male voters of that demographic voted for him, but he did not speak for them. he spoke for the union and. we saw the attacks on the unions place while he was president. and then they realized donald trump speak for me because he says what i what i believe he says what i want to say. the

so there's folks who who i call in the book a personal storytellers who are sharing from their personal experience, since people like we were talking about food stamps. so a wnba star who grew up on food stamps coming to share her story, her experience of that issue or a journalist who lived and and reported alongside icis coming to share his personal story of of the conflict in the region. so those witnesses are also an important part of the process and. interestingly i ended every interview too by asking, can you tell me a story of a witness who who stuck with any story and your years in congress and almost every single one told a story of a person of what i would call a personal storyteller someone who came and and told their experience of issue. and that is what really sticks with members. and i think really underlines the importance of those kinds of witnesses. of course, are also a fourth type of witness, which i call in the book a spokesperson for an issue and these are people i mean, we can think about them as and again, we the the food stamp hearing is just fresh in my mind bec

belafonte famously said, "i was an activist who became an artist, i was not an artist who became an activist." after headlines, we will spend the hour with harry belafonte in his own words. he died this week at the age of 96. supreme court neil gorsuch sold a property he co-owned to the head of a major law firm that has since had 22 cases before the supreme court. the sale to greenberg traurig ceo brian duffy came just nine days after the trump-appointed gorsuch was confirmed by the senate in 2017. previously, the property in rural colorado had languished on the market for two years. gorsuch reported the sale but left the box for the identity of the buyer on disclosure forms blank. the news, first reported by politico tuesday, comes in the wake of explosive revelations about fellow conservative justice clarence thomas and his ties to gop billionaire megadonor harlan crow, who lavished thomas with luxury gifts for two decades and bought property from the thomas family which was never disclosed. democrats are calling for investigations into both justices and for lawmakers to pass the supreme c

who contacted, did not know about this, then who knew?— then who knew? who are you doing this for? _ then who knew? who are you doing this for? there is _ then who knew? who are you doing this for? there is a _ then who knew? who are you doing this for? there is a rule _ then who knew? who are you doing this for? there is a rule for - then who knew? who are you doing this for? there is a rule for drama l this for? there is a rule for drama here in some cases. figs this for? there is a rule for drama here in some cases.— here in some cases. as you have shown. here in some cases. as you have shown- there — here in some cases. as you have shown. there will _ here in some cases. as you have shown. there will always - here in some cases. as you have shown. there will always be - here in some cases. as you have shown. there will always be a i here in some cases. as you have - shown. there will always be a chance with drama _ shown. there will always be a chance with drama to show a human side of it. with drama to show a human side of it to— with drama to show a human side of it to show— w

i corresponded with the military who are in the east who write well , there are a lot of things we buyhe front and says a and now we are simply well, they are outraged by the situation that the first is that no one communicates with them for these explanations, what the cabinet of ministers and the ministry of defense did, all the calculations that they do not know to the end what to do and the second, they are outraged well, we can't pay us turns out to be an official in the conditions of war, in conditions when everything has to be concentrated and all funds must be accumulated and transferred, not necessarily . you can pay half a million salaries there, 300 to 500,000 a million, then you can pay it because they are big, well, you can't be this one, because you don't understand them much and there are a lot of military personnel, so you don’t have enough for everyone, the main thing is that the price is eaten you already and how much, but it looks very cynical when , uh, well, people like saber explain, well, you have to pay so that they become the last corrupters, well, those who re

he was someone who had ups and downs, who had days, who had light days, who, you know, experienced the ups and downs of growing up in america like else had. he took his fair share of lumps and he had his own mistakes. and we cover all of that in the book. but was important to not make this just exercise in pain, just an exercise in to write his as a full person. and that made it easier us as authors to to deal with some of the harder of the book because we realized he was a full person, someone who had ups and downs and enjoys as well as the sorrows that ultimately ended in his death and that was one way we were able to deal with that. thank you. steve. i thought that i was an elder on panel, but now i know that tolu writes with a pen still so it's i would say i think there's 2a2 part answer to that question. i'm i was an african-american studies major in college and i've been an activist around you know, political social change racial justice whole life and that i've felt very connected to those who have gone before historically and always felt a very profound sense of responsibility

they are good americans who voted for candidates who lost. they realize hopefully the right thing to do is fight for the next election. >> thank you. we have time for a couple questions. yes, ma'am. >> [inaudible] -help me understand- why it is that the parties are accepting the down ballot election results but not the up ballot election results. how can i understand how they can justify that? >> yes. the question was, how can people believe in the integrity of a race that was down ballot on the same ballot where they doubt the integrity of the races up the ballot? this came up in the focus groups. there was an individual who doubted donald trump had lost in 2020 and doubted kari lake had lost, but he talked about a arizona congressperson he really liked, and because this person really fights for his values. i asked him, do you think this person was legitimately elected in 2020 and 2022, because he was literally on the same piece of paper as these other races, literally a couple lines down? you can kind of see him for a second. he kind of rea

christ they didn't know who it was.e thought it might have been the gardener who carried away the body of their beloved teacher. for them, being in front of the holy sepulcher was such an expectation associated with uncertainty, as if on the verge between them, faith and bewilderment about what could happen, some kind of mystery happened behind the closed gates of the holy sepulcher. they did not know who could roll away the stone for them, because it was very heavy, the stone on which the divine liturgy is performed. and now there is a stone that marks the stone that was rolled away from the grave. and the peace-bearers, being in front of the tomb, as well as many pilgrims. they, uh, were apparently in some kind of expectation of the miracle that could uh happen here. but the miracle on sunday saviors is the main sacrament that changes the world, because we know that on the sunday of christ it gives the forgiveness of sins, it gives a person a new life and the resurrection of christ is the main event that leads us to e

and i had already spoken with some individuals who i knew had done some research on the fact or who had been responsible for carrying on the sack and just asked them their opinion about whether they thought i might be a person who could do justice to the story, because that's important to me. i think that that really is critical to have it match between the subject matter of the topic and the author and i had received a very good amount of support and affirmation about that matter in this case. and so i had started doing some legwork and started doing some reading, and i was reading secondary materials posted online by an anthropologist named mark alexander, who was doing research on the fact i had to looks at a book by the historian heather williams, who had used the fact as a concluding touchstone in her study of enslaved people who had been freed by the civil war and who were then trying to find their family members. and i had to start to do research on the ground in south carolina, looking at the records of slave holders. obviously. and i described that just a moment ago in our conv

who did it. everyone knows the famous hersh told how it happened, the chinese showed how it was physically, who, when the name of the ships and everything for the sake of whom for the welfare of others. it is simply a loss of real self-worth of one's own culture history , an incredible european culture. well, how do you allow children to change sex, you allow children's castration, you don’t want to see that they are seizing body parts from the wounded in ukraine in order to sell them later abroad for each wounded or fresh corpse with which they took out the organs with no extra charge 172 dollars, and at the beginning we sent the wounded by stationary special centers, which were created in kramatorsk e, kramatorsk north donetsk there are the dying. uh, all the organs of the dying were removed there. even eyes, skin and coffee have been sent for pride since january. a professional transplantologist and or zabryu began to work with us. she completely changed the style of our work and, no matter wh

george richardson, who? who? mable hallam had accused of rape long in september or somewhere along there in the fall. right. because this was august in cep in september, she recanted her story. she had not been raped at all. she'd been having an affair with a white man and her husband busted out, so to speak. her husband out about it. but that. but. but the cry of rape is what started. the whole riot. the best thing. course it happened from the race riot. the formation of the naacp and that occurred because the time of the riot there a a writer or a well, folks called him a socialist or a communist, whatever. who happened to be in chicago and he about the up the uprise all the activity that was going in springfield and he wrote an for a magazine called the independent and his name was william william english walling and in his final question was, what organized say what or who who can step forward to help right the wrongs that happened to black residents of springfield and the culmination of that was the founding

of the authorities and the guarantee of the eradication of the russian world how does the law work who helps the law enforcement officers to look for the sellers and who are punished darina dobrovolska will tell you , they help the occupiers in holding pseudo-referendums, become adjusters of rocket attacks and surrender the positions of our soldiers teach children in schools according to russian methods, they lead occupying local administrations, they directly conduct business with the aggressor country, and this is just a few examples of how ukrainians deliberately cooperate with the enemy, the inevitability of punishing traitors is one of the most important tasks for the eradication of russian peace, says the mayor of temporarily occupied melitopol, where at least 700 people agreed to cooperate with the enemy, i would like to draw attention to those entrepreneurs who were engaged in business during the occupation russian passports, which is extremely important, pay taxes to the occupying power and to the country of the aggressor, the company should be held accountable instead, it sho

who can the violence abroad and here at home to who can unite instead of divide this nation at a time when 80% of every american budget goes for defense of our freedom. where is the man with and experience who can get the most security for every military dollar and lighten the staggering of taxes taxes can bankrupt america and save and the risk of starting a war. who is the one man stalin most and fears as leader of the united energies this free nation? instinctively the people of america know the answer as a bewildered and divided thought. lincoln a century ago we seek eisenhower now from every heart and horizon from women and youth, from farms and factories, even from democrat who placed principle above party. from all the people of america the thunder grown a century. brought the threat of a new slavery. but there is a new lincoln to meet the. statesmen soldiers, citizens. mr. american dwight david and you're watching c-span's american history tv. and this is our special series on speeches that define the presidency. we continue this week with a look at john kennedy. he was in the

we our job is to find authors who who have an idea or even to plan an idea. for example, in case of jim shapiro, the shakespeare scholar, i simply got in touch with them. and i hey, if the thought of writing a book just on othello, and he said, oh my god, i'd love to. and then he latched on to this idea of a short book about the play othello, and it's kind of a american in its american context over time. so but skip gates has done the same thing and jackie goes is on the same thing, especially with literary characters and figures. i mean, so our job is to solicit manuscripts, the authors and then help the press conceive the series broadly and also our job in part, excuse me, is to give this series chronological range. you know, we're in our discussions. we're always trying to balance the 19th century with the 20th century and now with a few books about people, characters from antiquity or shakespeare, for example. so that's our job. and then eventually we read proposals and we recommend up and down to the press and and we're now working with a brand new edito

want to grow and those who are just starting out, gives opportunities to those who have the skills , ready to work and create such an opportunity for others, submit an application and a business plan, get a grant and work in ukraine because there is a job, a government grant program for there are entrepreneurs. there is work. there is work. action gov.ua for the development of your business . i suggest a good dial . good morning to all. they will find out 15 of their wounded with weapons were prepared for surgery by kasimov's eighth ward and so everything is even special 69 and there is no one with a fever it must be that you are on duty and why was the temperature not lowered so nothing else in life rostislav ruslanovych 17 patients , two operations were performed at gunshot wounds, well, tempo allocation

who never get noticed. something goes wrong, who work really hard. and over the last two plus three plus years have been suffering a great deal of harassment and threats just for having done their jobs, extreme, well, they somehow managed the highest we've ever seen in american history. a large margin, two thirds of every eligible voters, 160 million americans, more than 20 million more ballots cast than ever before and did it in the middle of a global pandemic. and instead of celebrating fact, they've been under nonstop, as we sit here today, over 850 days after that election. so that dichotomy me between the reality of the success of american democracy and the perception amongst tens of millions of americans that, the exact opposite is why we had to write that book. so it's interesting as i'm physically sitting here between two guys who wrote a book called the big and the big lie, right? yeah, i did like that. they put you the two of them. yeah. you know, there is some narrative relevance this because the

our place doesn't exist for those who need. it's only for those who want it. so you have to walk in the door. but once you do, it's kind of red carpet and ticker tape parade and and you're welcomed, you know, the buddha say or nobly born remember who you really are. so so you want to create a safe place where people can remember who they really are, where they can be seen and cherished and at the homies, they've been locked up for a lot of years. we'll see. we're used to being watched, but we're not used to being seen. and so that's a very healing prospect for someone to be seen. and so they walk in, they're greeted by other gang members and then they begin, if they want to get into the 18 month program, they begins with drug testing, then an orientation and then an interview, or they can just come for anger management classes or tattoo removal or therapy or a whole slew of services. but the services are to the culture that cherishes them. so i'm going to read a couple of sentences and then i'm going to ask father boyle to talk about the various people, this b

fuck the nazis, who gained combat experience in the donbass, preference was given to those who servedn the national battalions and literally for a year or two military schools. ukraine were infected with nazism. i remember talking to my classmates. i myself studied in lvov e. there are many people left. who somehow knew each other, who studied, and they unanimously said that the year 15-16 was the time when nazism, as an ideology, went into a mustache. first of all, first at the officer corps. then, starting from the eighteenth year, from the nineteenth, the first issues of these nazis went, who immediately went to command positions. gone very hard cleaning up the current situation, the rest could only agree on how mobilization looks like in ukrainian, everyone has long been familiar with. e man now runs the risk of being in the armed forces of ukraine independence from their views. but if he wants to survive his arrival, he has to accept the rules of the game to mimic survive even before he gets to the front his views, if they differ from the generally accepted nazi views, post-war e

in other words, there were completely soldiers , those who would save up tickets and those who came tour place , too. answered the questions for a very long time and i don't know, maybe i was closing myself to the cinema , but the questions were and were yes, what were the key questions , that is, what is interesting to our audience, so if your audience is interested in how we found these main characters, because it is always very difficult find twins not just twins but twins who will play uh as actors a-ah we don't have very many of them. i'll tell you this , there are almost no actors exactly twins and that's why we took non-actors. but everyone had a desperate question: did they play this uh or do they have such the situation is the same as in the movie. therefore, they did not succeed and did not need to play. they have a completely different situation regarding their relationship with their parents, they are fine, and that is why they played , they really played, and there were many actors who were present and said that it was unreal, very cool acting on our tv viewers would like

it's not the unknown, a named farmer who doesn't give a darn who, who, you know, who's working the tractor. mean these are major corporations. i would think they'd be worried about lawsuits. bad image in the, in the media. i would think they'd be worried about they don't have any feelings about the fact that they have interests. that would make them less likely to have such back tackler displays of labor exploitation. no, it's such a good point. and one thing is, time. libra law sounds like it's a big serious thing. we have federal agents who enforce that. we also have state agent to enforce this law, but the maximum penalty for violation is $15000.00. so no matter what happens with child, no matter how much they work, no matter what they're doing, a corporation is not going to pay more than $50000.00, which i don't do for that. they make that it's not generally criminal matter. this is something that might now change. there's been a lot of pressure in the last couple weeks since the story came out to maybe reform that law to make a more serious penalty. but even if a child dies on the job

so this one, who was one of the leaders who gave this e information, but discrediting the voting machiness provided by the company. yes, i do not know the details and for me the main thing is different. for me , the main thing is that so rukalson was a symbol of the possibility of dissent in the united states within the framework. if you want the american elite within the american establishment and every once when we talked about american political orthodoxy, but conscience demanded to mention that there is still fox, there is also carlson who looks at the world and america differently. and now, this is how carlson was thrown out alexander dugin what do you think about this based on the information that we have, i am deeply convinced that the war that we talked about in the first part of the program, about which we constantly discuss between the collective west and russia, is at the same time civil war. at the very commandment, that is, she has and horizontal vertical dimension and in america itself there is a fierce conflict, between two completely diverging already polar opposite develo

he who shall not be named. you listen to nikki haley, it's like she doesn't know who he is and she served in his cabinet. mike pence doesn't say his name. i don't even know what ron desantis is saying. i can't understand him the last few weeks but not naming donald trump. you are not going to beat someone by closing your eyes, clicking your heels together three times and saying there is no place like home. that's not the way it's going to work. in american politics, if you want to beat somebody come you have to go get them and you have to make the case. what i'm saying tonight i think is the beginnings of the case against donald trump. that is the first task for the republican primary voters to decide who to nominate. and if we are willing to put up with that level of policy and character failure, then we will get what we deserve. i'm going to wrap up and let us get your questions because what matters to me more is to hear what you think and what you have to say and what your questions are. let's go to your que

find themselves— women who who who find themselves in— women who who who find themselves in a fight thatembly. i agree . couldn't assembly. i agree. couldn't agree more . we also have agree more. we also have a comment here from nemo who says saint george doesn't represent modern britain. we should bring back saint cuthbert, my favourite saint. i love that. but i wouldn't want to dispossess saint george . and dispossess saint george. and finally, we have another viewer who says saint jacob rees—mogg , who says saint jacob rees—mogg, dodi should definitely be a holiday. i wonder what he would think about that. thank you all so much for sending in your views. saint george's day takes place on the 23rd of april. every year to mark the martyrdom of england's patron saint. saint george was killed in the fourth century for refusing to make a sacrifice to pagan gods . since sacrifice to pagan gods. since then, his tomb in the roman province of palestine . now province of palestine. now israel has been the centre of pilgrimage for well over a thousand years, and his feast day has been celebrated

who does? who does that -- think she is?has a has the meaning of who was doris at any one time in his life since there were really three such separate doris. there was doris the larger than life drag and he really did seem to grow two or three feet and not just because the heels of the wigs when he got into drag. and there was doris the very quiet studious disciplined artist who people his on the movie set for the movie he made vegas in space who really had very to say because he was so focused on his work. and then there was doris the prostitute whom most of his friends really didn't know except when he was taking phone, that he would say, hi this phil? yeah, very versatile versatile. so it's that title isn't meant to be funny, but at the same time there's that layer of sadness under it. yeah. and did you come to know doris and decide to his story? i came to know doris because. went to work for mother magazine in 1983. and this outrage queen named silvana nova came to work in the art department and we got to be friends and

who win.when they calculate it, we can consider it a biological constant, that is, what percentage of people will remain ordinary at any intensity propaganda, this is a large percentage. this is a very large percentage, because you see not so many volunteers from donations and so on are fighting. the vast majority of people believe that this is not their war. that is, they may not be opposed to someone winning there, but a penny will not sacrifice and will not sacrifice time, and this percentage will not be involved either. i think it is stable for any society, in spite of any propaganda it is interesting, well, look, in russia they are trying to raise someone and people are constantly complaining. here write. they say that you know, we started weaving nets there, i invite friends there. they say it's stupid. you need it. here we donate here. here are our guys, mobilized there, something is missing there. let them go let the department of defense provide we won't get involved. there. why even

who can actually stand behind it, who benefits from it? you think about these russian partisans? just repeat the official version that it's russian partisans who did it. was it? could it actually have been? the version is constantly being put forward that it was actually done by the special services of the kremlin. and actually this is part of some internal clan struggle within russia, in particular with the same prigozhyn, we can’t. but to be honest , it’s it did not affect the position of the parish on the uh uh uh, neither on the critical nor on the military front. therefore, from my point of view, this version, if it has a place to exist, then from my point of view it looks, again, enough dynamo, that is, i thought that still the meaning of doing something like that, well, you don’t need a fighter jet, but on the other hand, we understand that march 2024 is the election of the president of the russian federation, and one of the key versions that the russians began to develop is the version about what is happening in russia certain anti

marc thiessen, who is not invited?o to the white house briefing a moment ago and here is peter doocy questioning karine jean-pierre. >> you are going to have three of the lawmakers who protested after -- >> peacefully protested. >> peacefully protested after the nashville covenant school shooting. have any of the victims or the victims' families been invited? >> i don't have anything to read out to you of any invite. >> john: the president is inviting the three tennessee lawmakers, two of whom were kicked out of the legislature, to talk about the assault weapons ban. you would think maybe you would want to include families of the people who died, not the lawmakers who were removed for protesting. >> consistent with the white house, kamala harris went to tennessee and met with the lawmakers but not the families. they don't seem to care about the families. i can't keep up with the democrat position on storming capitol hill. in 2011 in wisconsin, they were opposing scott walker's collective bargaining proerm, and 2021 aga

this includes those who were wounded, injured, killed, that is, and this includes those who were completelyd those who were wounded there, but in general in the ukrainian army. what do you think, in general, i would say about 150,000 dead. and what is this ukrainian contract? it is for the 7.400 foreign legion to comply with the rules to enforce the laws is a contract that provides for the only promise that you are given that after three years. you can get ukrainian citizenship if you speak at a basic level. evidence of corruption in the ukrainian army, weapons supplied from the west often do not reach the ukrainian addressee. on the other hand, it reaches the black market very well, for example. the battalion commander, who was in collusion, took and sold 20 anti-tank grenade launchers in an unknown direction as a sergeant in charge of the delivery of weapons. javelin fifty m4 rifles and two dozen m240 machine guns, the soldier is kept separately. i saw a 25 year old thirty-five-year-old officers drive new mercedes bmw audi agent luxury cars, that is, a complete package with leather seats

interesting characters are people who flawed, people who are evolving. people who are growing. people who are changing people who have problems and not small problems but high stakes problems. and i actually had all that and was that during the events of the book? and i needed to put that in the book in order sustain the readers interest. there was also a deeper reason, which was that, you know, if i was going to ask and i did for this book, i asked my subjects these indian workers to reveal so much, so deeply of their lives to reveal their hurts, their losses, their loves, their deprivations. and if i was to do that, ask them for that. if they were going to reveal that to me, then how could i not reveal all of that about myself. so i decided to do that. yeah. and it does lend authenticity the book and i'm sure also kept your interest in writing it because it had resonance in yourself and you know, that brings the tensions to the altar. and i'm glad you did that shifting now to and i'm sure a lot of people the first thing they will read about your book is the title the great es

who's who's opinion? i'd rather have and douglas compares it to the sermon on the mount says it wasn't a state paper. it calls it a sacred effort and douglas is just so touched by this final meeting with lincoln goes to another person's home afterwards and it's just gushing with enthusiasm about what it had been like to have that conversation with lincoln shortly after that lincoln invited douglas to tea and douglas turned him down because douglas had a speaking engagement and he had a policy of if i have a speaking engagement. i'm not gonna break it. and of course lincoln is then assassinated and doug was later said if i had known i would never get to see him again. i would have forgotten about that speaking fee. i could have had and gone to meet with lincoln for tea right so you see quite you do see quite an arc of change in the relationship between frederick douglass and abraham lincoln and as you say douglas change, yes. very much. so not just the evolution of lincoln's opinions. yeah. well, we have a

get pushed to the periphery, people who get told to be quiet, the folks who get expelled, the people who are pushed to the margins and show society what it truly means to fight, what it truly means to get to the center of the conversation, to get to the issues that are at stake, and sometimes that takes breaking a few decorum rules. sometimes to get from the periphery in the back of the house you got to go to the well of democracy and demand that democracy be true for everybody, not just for rich white men in suits, not just for rich white people who got these positions of power perpetuating the status quo. >> you know, there's a moment in american politics when that sort of impassioned, incensed rhetoric from clearly the progressive wing of the party would have seen, you know, on the left side. i feel like this is now the mainstream opinion in the democratic party and i wonder how -- you know, have you talked to other folks in the democratic caucus about what's happening in tennessee? is the feeling of anger shared across the spectrum of democrats from centrists to progressives >> a

who has access to means of violence? who has the and who has control of institutions. and it's a complex answer to your question, but those are the three things that i look to, right? so i argue in the grand chapter. i think grant and the republicans don't have enough will. i think it's a clausewitz. that's a clausewitz moment there where the republicans actually control all the institutions they the money and they have the guns. but the northern republic ends don't want to keep pushing. and there are all kinds of reasons why they don't. and grant is not a good enough leader to actually convince them to, persuade them on this. i think when we get to impeachment, there is an institutional problem there. it's an institutional makes it nearly to remove a corrupt illegal president. and when it comes to what you described so eloquently and compellingly. chandra, the experience in the south, even the constitutions and the laws are changing. they become more multiracial. the on the ground is that former enslaved persons are now free. people don't have access to the resources

who do you whoa responsible? what happened is that the americans and american troops, i remember a special unit. they called scorpion. there were others as well. they reported to scorpion and they murdered, arrested, and tortured people. they are responsible. i'm not talking just about myself and my rights. i'm talking about hundreds of thousands of iraqis who ended up in prisons, people from all over a rock, baghdad, basrah, et cetera. the american stripped them of their rights and did not letting them fight for them even now. they destroyed the country, killed so many people. so many women and children ruined their homes. they stormed houses with only women and children side and killed them. and what are we to do? stay silent and only talk to god. this is not a solution. many people that we have spoken to in iraq, indeed across the world, said george bush, tony blair, should be charges warm. what do you make of those claims? yes, they need to be executed. of course i agree that it is their fault. what do you wa

who radiation adviser dr.ted a report that high the toxicity of the united uranium , interacting with its albeit weak, but still, the existing radioactivity causes extreme harm to the human body. but this study was put under the window, what happens then this study disappears the tail of the archives, why uh-huh because the who foolishly in 1959 at the insistence of the usa signed an agreement with the international atomic energy agency that if one of the two organizations wants to publish work on radioactivity and its consequences. she must first consult with another organization. and if another organization does not agree with the results, then the publication is prohibited and since the international atomic energy agency. i never agreed with negative studies, and the radioactivity that works has not been published so far. director wagner, referring to some barberstock, claims that the who refused to publish 16 more similar studies on the dangers of combined damage. you know, if most of the scientists who sa

should have known but who didn't. and alger hiss was a great chameleon in the end. he's very unlike very just from the great soviet spies of the cambridge spies of the british establishment, men like guy burgess, kim philby, donald mcclane, john cairncross, who were also major soviet spies at the same period, they were wracked with guilt. they drank themselves into early graves. they instead of standing trial, they escaped the iron curtain and went to moscow where they literally died. alcoholism in their moscow of darkness. they were men who were absolutely riven by their spying and their betrayal. but not alger hiss. alger hiss, for whatever reason, maintained his equanimity till the day he died. he, through a numerous appeals process, he went on speaking and college campuses again, trying to establish his. one. all was said and done. he was a cool customer and he maintained that right to the end. one of the things that you talk about is in the title of the book, gods of deception, and i immediately went back and loo

who could be?k, with liberalism, sometimes, it can get mad, but it’s extremely stupid when those who in the liberal model would be left with noodles wants liberalism when, as a propagandist, i defend our development model and our social orientation. i defend not my own interests, but the interests of the electoral majority of people in my country, belarus nine and a half million people a couple of thousand live very richly a couple of tens of thousands live simply richly 9 million live well. someone even lives so-so, but everyone cannot live well in any economy in the world, ukraine 40 million people before the war, a million live very richly 2 million live. just 3 million are rich. 34 million live normally. 34 million live so-so. that's all, the liberal model of the economy. yes, not even economics, but the essence of power about power last week, too . alexander grigoryevich answered one remark of one judge saying that the supreme court is a group of lawyers who correct the mistakes of other court

there are people who swore an oath to the constitution to protect and defend this nation who thought that was great. how these two things could survive from the founding of this nation until january 6 to where they thought it was better to throw america out everything that it ever had become to listen to one man's version of it and betray their oath. i don't understand that as a former member of the armed forces, it's disgusting to me. >> so what's next? >> what's next is we're going to have to see just whether americans or the people who claim that they're americans -- and i don't use that term loosely, ok? to be an american means to believe in the core values of this nation. and some of those core values are not written down in the constitution. the constitution doesn't say that you have to be decent to other american citizens. but those are values that were shown all over the world as we, when from the storming of the beaches of normandy. my grandfather fought in world war one as an african american, 200,000 african american soldiers were in france in world war one and i still mee