supervisor wiener merngzed the letter coming in across the country from midwest and new york and washington dc and cal. across the lgbt team there is a sense this ordinance could be a pivotal moment in changing that conversation and bringing more attention to issue. in a study done for lgbt [inaudible] 90 percent said they wouldn't be safe in the facility and 50 percent of respondent said they are or someone they knew faced discrimination and this included verbal and physical harassment by staff or other residence [inaudible] restriction of visitors. refruzal to provide basic care. deninel of medical care and refusal to respect the persons identify. to give 2 examples from that report both from california, john and jack went to a nusilty and the facility said they refused to bathe jack because they didn't want to touch a gay person. a transgender [inaudible] forced to eat by herself and not allowed to participate in any activities. there is no doubt california provides non discrimination protection, what we need is clarification and guidance in the specific context of long term care facilit