. >> wikileaks, i love wikileaks. ♪ buried just under the surface, the answer to it all. ♪ we want tod each other. ♪ [ barks ] radio: scorching heat today, staywalter!ut there! stop suffering with hot ac. cool it yourself with a/c pro. in just 3 easy steps, enjoy the comfort of 2 times the cooling boosters from the #1 selling coldest air. nothing cools like a/c pro. (large boat honking) ♪ i'm living that yacht life life life life ♪ top speed fifty knots life ♪ on the caribbean seas ♪ it's a champagne and models potpourri ♪ on my yacht made of cuban mahogany ♪ gany, gany, gany ♪ watch this ♪ ♪you are loved ♪ the energy conscious whopeople among usle? say small actions can add up to something... humongous. a little thing here. a little thing there. starts to feel like a badge maybe millions can wear. who are all these caretakers, advocates too? turns out, it's californians it's me and it's you. don't stop now, it's easy to add to the routine. join energy upgrade california and do your thing. >>> hackers allegedly connected to the russian government break into the servers of the democrat

. >> guccifer 2.0 will be soon to be joined by wikileaks.t founded by julian -- >> we hasn't a third party, somebody like, oh i don't know, wikileaks. >> and on jewel 22nd quicky leeks posted it will release more than 19,000 e-mails from the democratic national committee. >> so what in effect you have electronic evidence of a middle man as it were between russia and wikileaks. >> we were pretty high on our confidence and that's what happened. >> wikileaks however continues to deny receiving the hack documents from russia. just three days before the start of the democratic party convention, the stolen e-mails would suggest that top leaders of the democratic national committee were biased in pharr of hillary and against hernandez for the party's nomination. >> bernie beats trump. >> all right everybody now settle down. >> the chair of the dnc debby shaulz was forced to resign. the first scout of russia's influence operation, and the press quickly shifted focus toward the conversery. russia's influence campaign appeared to be having an effect.

at the time wikileaks was just an obscure open government website. why wikileaks, then? >> i think it's important to remember the context. i tried to go to "the washington post" first. i tried to go to the "new york times." >> reporter: over the course of four months, she leaked diplomatic cables, battlefield reports, and guantanamo detainee profiles. more than 700,000 documents in all. the impact, explosive. >> it's the biggest leak in u.s. military history. >> there are names. there are operations. >> it is an attack on the international community. >> reporter: less than two months after the disclosures first made news, manning would be taken into custody from her barracks in iraq. did you think you would ever get caught? were you ready to pay the price? >> i'm not focused on consequences or what this means or what that means. i'm focused on the day to day. >> reporter: meanwhile the government scrambling to assess the actual damage manning's leaks had caused. do you consider chelsea manning a whistle-blower? >> no. >> reporter: rick leggitt was a high-ranking intellig

it was released by wikileaks on marchth. on march 9th, in london where julian assange has lived from charges in his native sweden, over there nigel farage was seen leaving the embassy. that's him in the back in this photo. he is a far right politician from the uk most famous for leading that effort in the uk to do brexit. now nigel farage you might also recognize from his time right there in the gold gilded elevators of trump tower or from his time on the campaign trail with donald trump. yep. and nigel was back in the uk at wikileaks headquarters on march 9th in london. right before wikileaks gave their big press conference about destroying the cybercapabilities of the cia. a buzzfeed news reporter saw him leaving the embassy and asked a basic question. what was he doing there that particular day? nigel farage responded he couldn't remember, and he had no idea why he had just been inside that building. more recently, though, he said he was there for, quote, journalistic reasons. today the british newspaper "the guardian" re

and nigel was back in the uk at wikileaks hau wikilea wikileaks headquarters on march 9th in london.ews reporter saw him leaving the embassy and asked a basic question. what was he doing there that particular day? ni he responded he couldn't remember. more recently he was there, for quote, journalistic reasons. today it reports that nigel farage is a person of interest into the inquiry of russia and the trump campaign. sources with knowledge of the investigation said the former ukip leader had raised the interest of fbi investigators because of his relationships with individuals connected to both the trump campaign and julian assange, the wikileaks founder whom farage visited in march. farage has not been accused of wrongdoing and a not a expect or target, but being a person of interest believes investigates believe he may have information about the acts that are under investigation and he may therefore be subject to their scrutiny. the article goes on that pop of the things the intelligence v t investigators have been looking at as point of contact, if you try ang late russia, wikil

i love wikileaks. >> we love wikileaks. boy, wikileaks. they have revealed a lot. >> boy, i love reading those wikileaks. >> anyway, after being elected president trump dismissed the seriousness of the hack. let's watch him there. >> i think the computers have complicated lives very greatly. the whole, you know, age of computer has made it where nobody knows exactly what's going on. i just want them to be sure because it's pretty serious, george, and i want them to be sure. and if you look at the weapons of mass destruction, that was a disaster and they were wrong. and so i want them to be sure. i think it's unfair if they don't know. >> sean spicer was asked about the collusion charge in an off camera briefing today where trump accused obama of collusion with the russians. >> is there an element of hip pock krissie here, sean, russia, if you're listening, i hope you're able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing. i think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. how can you accuse president obama of obstructing when he was

it was in the hands of wikileaks. that was going to come out or what.bout, thatoncerned was not compounded by potential hacking that could hamper vote counting, affect the election process itself. in september, when i saw june in china, i felt -- when i saw felt the most, i effective way to make sure that did not happen was to talk to him directly and tell him to cut it out and there would be consequences if he did not. we did not see further tampering of the election process, but the leaks through wikileaks had already occurred. look back in terms of how we handle that, i think we handled it the way it should have been. we allowed law enforcement and the intelligence community to do its job without political input. we briefed all parties involved in terms of what was taking place. when we had a consensus, we announced it, not through the white house or me, but through the intelligence communities that carried out the investigations. we allowed view and the public to make an assessment as to how to way that going -- how to weigh that going into the elec

you now have not only nation states trying to steal our stuff, but folks like wikileaks out there trying to steal american secrets for the sole purpose of undermining the united states and democracy. >> this is a hundred-year problem. >> it's not new. >> it's going to get -- it goes

what was his relationship with assange and wikileaks and how did he know that mr. podesta was next in the barrel and that there was political dynamite using his own words about the clintons that were about to many could out from this group? >> you confirm that roger stone will be testifying before the committee? >> i'm not doing that. i'm encouraging him to follow up on what he said, that he wants to testify publically. i'm just commenting on mr. stone's words. if he wants to testify publically -- again, no one would be lhappier than i would because of all the tweets that you referenced that took place last summer. >> congressman, why would he be testifying behind closed doors? it's not as if -- one would assume he doesn't have classified clearance. he wouldn't have anything classified he would be discussing with the committee. why not have it out in the public? >> look, i can't reference who will or won't testify in a closed setting. all i'm suggesting is that, i would love to take him up on that. >> do you see any reason for someone like roger stone to need to te

you now have not only nation states trying to steal our stuff, but folks like wikileaks out there trying to steal american secrets for the sole purpose of undermining the united states and democracy. >> this is a hundred-year problem. >> it's not new. >> it's going to get -- it goes back a hundred years, but the technology is going to turn it into a constant battle. how are you as the new director, you were on the house intel committee for a number of years before you came over, so you were aware of this, how are you trying to change the culture where people just give stuff away for political vendetta, or in the case of treachery, treason? >> in some ways, i think it's accelerated, hugh. i think there is a phenomenon, the warship of edward snowden, and those who steal american secrets for the purpose of self-aggrandizement or money or for whatever their motivation may be, does seem to be on the increase.

at the time wikileaks was just an obscure open government website. why wikileaks, then?ur months, she leaked diplomatic cables, battlefield reports, and guantanamo detainee profiles. more than 700,000 documents in all. the impact, explosive. >> it's the biggest leak in u.s. military history. >> there are names. there are operations. >> it is an attack on the international community. >> reporter: less than two months after the disclosures first made news, manning would be taken into custody from her barracks in iraq. did you think you would ever get caught? were you ready to pay the price? >> i'm not focused on consequences or what this means or what that means. i'm focused on the day to day. >> reporter: meanwhile the government scrambling to assess the actual damage manning's leaks had caused. do you consider chelsea manning a whistle-blower? >> no. >> reporter: rick legit was a high-ranking intelligence official at nsa at the time. >> she didn't go through any of the whistle-blowing channels that she had. she could have gone to the judge advocate general. she could hav

it wikileaks has been the same thing. wikileaks, like him or not, they have not been proven wrong once. not one time in 11 years. could it be possible -- we don't have all the information at this point -- we will include a deeper dive, i want to be very clear here. i would argue and this is important -- 99.9% of those that work in our intelligence community i believe are good people. they are patriotic americans and they are brave. they work to keep us safe in a very evil dark and dangerous world. they have nothing to do with any of the steep state stuff. but the big problem we have in this country is we have deep state, selective leaking that is designed by some in power that clearly want to hurt and i would argue even take down the president of the united states and overturn the election that you voted for last november. give these obama holdovers. if this young woman is a minnow, then you have the deep state sharks at the top of the food chain that would be orchestrating this sabotage and misuse of our intelligence com

t >> the russians, wikileaks, same thing.umped the john podesta emails, my email account was turned into the biggest scandal since lord knows when. they covered it like it wasai pearl harbor. men paid for the speeches they made, i got paid for the speeches i made. it was used and i thought it was unfairly used, i have my complaints about former director comey. >> tucker: think about the wrath you have heard against the president. he's narcissistic, he won't accept information he disagrees with, he betrays friends and allies for his own personal gain, based on what you just saw and her behavior the last few weeks, do any of these criticisms not apply to hillary clinton? she can't accept explanations for her defeat, she's accusing the trump campaign affording specific hacking efforts to the minute and is so narcissistic, the only person she can't blame for her defeat is herself. even her biggest handicaps were self-inflicted. charles krauthammer is a writer and columnist who joins us now. it does sound like what people make of

a sympathetic when wikileaks was started, it was to challenge the government and i think assange has become an anarchist and his target is the united states he has no other target. so, are we -- we have exhausted the subject? thank you. [applause] [inaudible conversations]

clinton did also, just a comment on the russian .nvestigation all those wikileaks things that came out -- of the washington post or new york times, a reporter had actually reported on some of the things that came out in wikileaks, they would have won an award or pulitzer to suppressspiracy bernie sanders, given the messages, given those questions to hillary, all of the things that came out. i think this has been an incredible witchhunt against mr. trump and i would like to hear your thoughts. sen. lee: first of all, it is important to remember that the whole decision in which jim comey found himself last summer was odd. it was untenable. i felt bad for him being in that position in the first place. and it does and did at the time make me wonder why he agreed to be in that position in the first place. it is unprecedented to have the fbi director in a position at all. the fbi director, rather than the attorney general will be making decisions about whether to prosecute, and then holding a press conference to announce the decision not to prosecute, that is highly unusual. in fact, i'm not

>> domey, wikileaks, voter suppression, fake news. judge jeanine: hillary clinton in tonight's street justice. you won't want to miss a minute of this one. justice starts now. u.s. attorney general jeff sessions to appear on capitol hill this tuesday. attorney general jeff sessions agrees to go before the senate intelligence committee just one week after the blockbuster testimony of former f.b.i. director james comey. full analysis on that coming up. but first to my opening statement. with 9 country on the verge of a constitutional crisis and a level of hysteria not witnessed since watergate, the greatest political hoax since eve convinced adam to eat that apple is being spun by jim comey in a conspiracy worthy of a greek tragedy and there is no good ending. he arrives all indig nanlts before a senate intelligence committee calling the president of the united states a liar. saying he's the victim. he's been defamed. the president said the f.b.i. was poorly run. imagine. were your feeling hurt, jim? as if we didn't already know the f.b

wikileaks, i love wikileaks. >> that was october 10, three days after the u.s. intelligence community put out a statement. now look, things get said in the heat of a campaign, that's understood. but the election is over, donald trump is president. but what is being done by the white house? kellyanne conway didn't point this out, but she could have that the president has signed an executive order on cyber security that calls federal agencies to submit risk assessment reports within 90 days and give the military a larger share of responsibility for cyber security. oddly, it does not mention specifically russia or russian hacking. beyond that, from the president, we haven't seen much action or heard much real concern. although we're not privy to conversations the president has had with top intelligence and law enforcement officials, we do know from some of their testimony, from reports of their testimony, that he's very interested in the russian investigation, mainly as it relates to clearing him or his associates. the common thread seems to be a lack of interest i

laura: wikileaks was founded in 2006.nk he understood, before a lot of people, how the internet would change global politics, and how it would change journalism. both for better and for worse. when i started filming, it was after the first manning releases came out, which were the war logs and collateral murder video. for me, as somebody who had been documenting post 9/11 america, i thought it was important information we needed to know. u.s. foreign-policy and wars. then, you have today, where you are seeing almost the bad manifestations of how the internet can be used to change global politics. i think julian is fascinating. he also understood that, for journalists, the job we do to protect sources, it is not enough to say "i am not going to with the because powers of surveillance we now have, you need anonymous tools. you need to be able to provide a way to give security to sources. he did all these things, and he created what is called an anonymous drop box. a source can drop information without saying who they are. t

oh, that's wikileaks. and what's the difference between whistleblower or traitor. >> i think that michael moore-- how is michael moore and whoever is running the website decipher what's real or not? if you want to look at fake news, take a look at this website and what he's trying to do. eric: rachel? >> he has a new movie coming out. this is just a media ploy. eric: juan? >> i think that might be right, but i must say, i am tuned in to the idea if somebody is betraying the interests of the american people, behaving criminally, we want to know about it. eric: yes, we do. how about you, gina. >> yes, we have mechanisms in place for that. it's not the place of michael moore, he needs to stick to his lame socialist documentaries. eric: an attack is igniting forbe a push of a travel ban in ith you on news headquarters. now, back to cashin' in. >> president trump doubling down on his calls for a u.s. travel ban in the wake of the u.s. terror attack in london. his new push comes as we learn one of the suspects a

> on top of this, wasn't this about the same time that the access hollywood came out and the big wikileaks dump >> you're fast forwarding to october 7th, when the obama administration in fact finally decided to publicly blame putin, excuse me, russia for hacking the election. it was october 7th, and that very same day, just hours after the statement came out from the obama administration, the podesta e-mails were dumb d by wikileaks and saw the same day that the access hollywood tape was released by the "washington post" >> what are you hearing from those that you talked with? you know, from what i was reading in your report is that some of the administration or looking back and feel as though i believe the quote was they what is it they felt they should have done. >> some senior administration officials, in fact, kind of looked back in hindsight and feel that perhaps, their response in the end were not forceful enough, >> talking about the obama administration >> correct. >> the obama administration on december 29th, announced a package of economic sanctions on a handful of senior russian

the head of wikileaks. called him his hero. boy, for an investigation, and i want to be careful how i say this, for an investigation looking at the possibility of linkages between the trump campaign and the russians, the fact that a guy who, until august of 2015 was employed by that campaign, seems to know in advance what wikileaks is going to do, those questions can probably be asked in open session. but boy, are we ever interested in the answers to those questions. >> to that point, stone has told cnn, i quote, i am confident that podesta most likely repeated his lie that i knew in advance about the hacking of his e-mail, and i'm anxious to rebut this falsehood. i'm still unhappy that my testimony will not be in public. but i believe it's more important to resolve the question of russian collusion with the trump campaign which i believe was nonexistent. you can't say, i guess, whether or not john podesta claimed that stone had knowledge of the talking of his e-mail. i think stone talked about an october surprise. but that's c

at the time, wikileaks wasn't necessarily tied to the russians. and until recently, the intelligence community didn't show that it was tied to the russian intelligence agency. >> so then candidate trump was pro hacking all kinds, not just the russians? >> the president said lots of things during campaign. i'll play rewind on whether it's secretary kerry or president clinton or president obama, i can find -- >> i don't think any of them welcome adversary hacking. >> and i don't believe president trump did either. you're making it seem like the russians are hacking into the system and changing a "d" vote to an "r" vote. >> it was the e-mails that they took from the democratic national committee. >> well, when the democratic national committee -- >> let me finish. and john podesta and the candidate of the republican party donald trump didn't say, this is a crime that should be prosecuted. regardless of who do it. he said, i love wikileaks. >> that's a true statement. i'm not going to deny it. the rnc and dnc were hacked. the rnc put up a firewall. i

wikileaks. i love wikileaks! >> wikileaks is amazing.g out. >> hillary clinton, as wikileaks proves, is a corrupt globalist. >> don't you wish the press would pick up wikileaks and report it? >> donald trump loved leaks on the campaign trail. didn't seem to matter whether the leaks were legal. the fbi was of course looking at the hacks and e-mails. now trump doesn't love leaks anymore. his administration says they're going to crack down on them, especially when they involve classified info. there is nothing unusual about a white house pursuing the leaking of classified information. the obama administration prosecuted chelsea manning. the bush administration dealt with an independent prosecutor over its outing of a cia agent, valerie plame. what's different here is the recurring suggestion that there is something deeply sinister about leaking unclassified information even from whift citizens which is also known as talking to the press. jim comey voluntarily disclosed that he had directed information to the press about his dealings with tr

they're working with wikileaks.nd quite frankly, i think the media failed as well to take this as serious as it was, with respect to the assault on our democratic process by the russian federation. >> as you know, the longtime trump confidant associate roger stone, he's scheduled to testify at the end of july. before the house intelligence committee. in a state to cnn, stone said i'm reading it now, i am confident that podesta most likely repeated his lie that i knew in advance about the hacking of his e-mail. and i'm anxious to rebutt this falsehood. your reaction. >> you know, mr. stone's relationship to the truth is about as good as president trump's. and you know, he's threatened to sue me. and i think, send the process servers because we'll see who wins in court, you know. i think that mr. stone said in august of 2016 -- >> i have the tape, let me read it. august 21st of last year, roger stone tweeted this. trust me, it will soon the podesta's time in the barrel, that's the way he wrote it, #crookedhillary. tha

it was news that was put forward by various state institutions, it was the wikileaks, hacking of the democratic headquarters, we got a whole different alternative narrative that has been able to enter the regulatory us news mainstream and this is the problem of the 21st century. we no longer have three channels and two newspapers that sift to the news and then put forward the main news stories of the day. news comes from all different sources, it's hard to verify and there are various ways by which the new stories can come to the top of the agenda and it creates a very different environment. this gets to the whole question of fake news and the russians ability to use these sources to push forward its internationalih agenda. it's a new use of soft power and the russians have decided that this is an area where they want to focus on. >> host: democrats line, marsha, trenton, new jersey. marsha, are you there for the three thank you for taking my call. what i want to know is why the president would even suggest lifting sanctions on the two homes that they told the russians to get out of

some people think rich leaked information from the d-n-c to wikileaks, and that's why he was killed. but many call that a conspiracy theory. today the independent group, "the profiling project" will release its initial findings. the group consists of forensic experts and george washington university graduate students. a crime alert in fairfax county where a man tried to sexually assault a mother - who was walking with her six-year-old daughter! it happened early sunday morning on vista drive in bailey's crossroads. police say the thief took the woman's phone... but when he tried to touch her, she broke free, grabbed her little girl - and ran. so far, no arrest in this case. record breaking heat for millions of americans. another scorcher ahead in the southwest. the high teperatures that are already cancelling flights today. and here in our area - the storms gone - and taking the humidity with them. the breath of fresh when you head out today. pro tip for fruit lovers: giant has unbelievable produce prices. so you'll never have to choose between your favorites. i thought i was your fa

wikileaks. i love wikileaks. >> well, that was october 10th. three days after the u.s. intelligence community put out its statement. things get said in the heat of a campaign but the election is over, donald trump is president completely but legitimately. so the question is what is being done by the white house? but kellyanne conway didn't point this out but she could have pointed out the president has signed a order that calls federal agencies within 90 days and gives the military a larger share of responsibility for cyber security. oddly it does not specifically mention russia or russian hacking. from the president we haven't seen much action or heard much real concern and obviously we're not privy to conversation he's had with top law enforcement officials. we know from reports that he's interested in the russia investigation as it pertained to clearing him or his associates. and a lack of interest in the threat. >> did you have any interactions with the president that suggested he was taking that hostile action seriously? >> i don't remember any interactions with th

we love wikileaks. they have revealed a lot. there's some beauties coming out. wikileaks.kileaks. >> ned price worked in the obama administration during this crucial time. he's former national security counsel. nice to see you. >> good to see you. >> i'm sympathetic to everyone in the white house who is working on this. 20/20 hindsight, you have such great vision. at the time things were happening and so much confusion, not knowing what russia was doing. >> monday morning quarterbacks are undefeated. our critics are judging our actions in mid-2016 based on what we know by mid-2017. it's an unfair standard. knowing what we know we went on an aggressive push to make it clear both privately to the russians that we knew what they were up to through multiple warnings, multiple channels over many weeks and to the american people most clearly on october 7th but in a series of messages from the department of homeland security, the dni, the white house podium exactly what the russians are up to. no one should be surprised. the voices we're hearing from the hill that are saying we s

reportera: chelsea manning, filtrÓ información a wikileaks informaciÓn sobre irÁn y afganistÁn, durantee en una corte marcial de violar la ley de espionaje y robar informaciÓn gubernamental. fue condenada a 35 aÑos de prisiÓn. letras cumplÍa condena, cambio de sexo. finalmente, recibiÓ una amnistÍa del presidente barack obama. durante la entrevista, ella agradeciÓ obama y aceptó su responsabilidad. " tengo una responsabilidad con el pÚblico. todos tenemos una responsabilidad". >> quÉ la llevÓ a arruinar su carrera? >> estÁbamos recibiendo informaciÓn, pero todo era muerte y destrucciÓn. deje de ver estadÍsticas y empecÉ a ver personas. reportero: la ex soldado dice que su intenciÓn era crear un debate sobre las cosas que veÍa como agente de inteligencia. manning, fue puesta en libertad el pasado 18 de mayo, luego de un perdÓn otorgado por barack obama. >> eso era lo que querÍa, me han dado una gran oportunidad. reportera: asegurÓ que trató de suicidarse dos veces, mientras estuvo presa. enrique: una empresa farmacÉutica, iniciÓ el retiro de una pastilla anticonceptiva mal etiquetada. .

wikileaks says they want the reporter fired because it was a reporter that outed her.'s the issues. because wikileaks, assange, glen greenwald, where they've basically, metaphorically, in the bed together from the start? >> juan: yeah. you have assange now saluting her saying this information was going to the public. and to come back to dana's point, i think it's okay that we say that the document allegedly said was that the russians had succeeded with spear phishing attacks on local election offices in the country with the intent of disabling the election machines. this is important information. >> greg: you know what phishing is, right? it's just trying to get your password. people mistake phishing for w hacking. we have signs all over our company, make sure you have passwords. it's preying on people who aren't changing theirit passwor. >> kimberly: like "watters' world." >> they aren't happening on thea machines! >> but it isn't like hacking the machines. >> how did she get through this? it's pretty obvious. she has top-secret security. >> that's probably what it is

figuring out the effect of wikileaks during the final months of the campaign. did that harm hillary clinton? and what -- i have found using the data was nat fact there costume be some correlation to between decide they would vote for donald trump and when searches for wikileaks facts jump up and if you look at the national poll that might actually be a stronger correlation than when james comey decided to send his nice little letter to congress. don't think that wikileaks got asked all that much in terms of after the elects. more people were concentrated on comey, but in fact the google data suggested otherwise. and that goes back again to i think the question of were americans being asked about wikileaks in their polling? perhaps not as much as you might have thought. and also one of the thing is think century day tata is more difficult to get at is why are people voting the way they are? survey data polls are very, very good at predicting who is going to win and who is going to lose, regardless of perhaps what some people might argue. what they're not good at

disclosures about the democrats and john podesta if he didn't have some sort of contact with wikileaksr the russians who were apparently doing the hacking. that's where roger's role is at its most mysterious and i think that's where the committee is going to be looking for clarification. >> jeff toobin, jeff, thanks. >>> well, coming up, how a vacationing former president obama is dealing with needling from the current president. when this bell rings... ...it starts a chain reaction... ...that's heard throughout the connected business world. at&t network security helps protect business, from the largest financial markets to the smallest transactions, by sensing cyber-attacks in near real time and automatically deploying countermeasures. keeping the world of business connected and protected. that's the power of and. how if guests book direct ater, choicehotels.com and stay twice they'll get a $50 gift card? summertime. badda book. badda boom. got you a shirt! ...i kept the receipt... book now at choicehotels.com at johnsonville, naturally hardwood smoked. 100% premium pork. no fillers.

went on further with politico saying, "the claim i had knowledge of the e hacking of his e-mail by wikileaks in advance is a demonotra momonstr" joining us as well, former hillary clinton campaign manager robby mook. robby, in the last months of the campaign, roger stone repeatedly discussed back-channel communications with wikileaks founder julian assange. how big a problem is roger stone for the trump administration when it comes to this investigation? because he says, look, he can explain it all, there was nothing there. >> i think be in very deep trouble if any of the statements as withdryou said, multiple tim claimed to have contact with julian assange, conduit to which the russians leaked these e-mails, pushed them out to the press. he predicted thad jo eed that j would be, quote, in the barrel way back in august. if those statements were true, what he was saying at that time is true, he's in very big trouble and the trump campaign is in very big trouble so i'm frankly surprised that he's willing to testify if his story at the hearings is different than the story he was repeatedly tell

it's a famous embassy because that's where the wikileaks guy julian assange has lived for years. that's him back there in the purple tie. that was march 9th, the same day julian assange and wikileaks gave a briefing about them dumping a trove. he was leaving the embassy and asked him what he was doing there that day. and nigel farage responded that he could not remember. i love this quote so much, i want to kiss it. quote, i love this. i can actually do it from memory. approached b buzzfeed news as he left to g into a car waiting around the corner, farage said he could not remember what he had been doing in the building. i don't know. was i just in a building? really? that may be the sort of thing that got fbi investigators working on the trump/russia probe interested in nigel farage according to "the guardian." the guardian reported they are looking at him, quote, because of his relationships with individuals connections to both the trump campaign and julian assange. quote, one of the things the intelligence investigators have been looking at is points of contact and persons inv

during the campaign, podesta's private e-mails were hacked and published on wikileaks., though, is incredibly fascinating story part of a cnn special report coming up at 10:00 p.m. eastern. jim sciutto hosts. here's part of jim's report. >> in addition to the organizations that were targeted, multiple individuals were targeted with phishing e-mails that resembled google warnings. >> director at the cyber security firm, fire eye. >> they clicked on those thinking they were security warnings and basically transported them to a place where the adversary could collect their credentials and reuse them to gain access to their accounts. it was a reasonably realistic e-mail. it looked fairly legitimate. >> reporter: a prime target was the chairman of hillary clinton's campaign. john podesta. >> there was a google alert that there was some compromise in the system and change the password. >> reporter: this seemingly benign message was actually a spearphishing e-mail. it warned someone just used your password and prompted podesta to change his password immediately by clicking on

and didn't happen with wikileaks. this is his worst nightmare and that's where he is. >> and now he -- >> it all comes back to a tweet. >> i don't mean to minimize or laugh at it in any way. this is deadly serious. >> yeah. >> and finally we are going to have a real investigation that goes to the most serious thing which is the russians undermining our elections and the question of whether or not anyone around donald trump or donald trump had anything to do with -- >> with that. as maeve said, you know, all of this is -- >> that's the real question. >> he really brought this on himself with the tweet about the taping. and now he is being compelled -- there he goes, saying james comey better hope, there's that word, hope, that there are no tapes of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press. so -- >> look. >> okay. hang on. i want to ask this question because the leaders of the house, russia investigation, they want to see those tapes. if they exist. and they want them by june 23rd, if they exist. now he's

about wikileaks to sew discontent among the democratic party and gain republican voters. >> yeah.aw prior to november was normal partisan banter on the stuff but the current administration knew what the russians were doing. i don't think president trump knew or candidate trump or candidate clinton -- >> candidate trump was informed by intelligence -- one of his daily briefings, one of the briefings he got, as a presidential candidate anyway, congressman i'm sorry, we're out of time. thank you so much for joining me. >> thank you. >> hope you have a lovely day. jeff sessions and the russian ambassador the fbi and congress, are reportedly investigating classified intelligence suggesting an unkiss disclosed private meeting between the ambassador and trump aides last year. sixes' people say no. what kind of new problems could this pose to the trump white house? america's beverage companies have come together to bring you more ways to help reduce calories from sugar. with more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all, smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels, and s

wikileaks says they want the reporter fired because it was a reporter that outed her. >> greg: weren'they basically, metaphorically, in bed together from the start? >> juan: yeah. you have a sans now saluting her julian assange saying this information was going to the public. it's important saying what the documents allegedly said was that the russians had fear phishing attacks on local election offices in the country with the intent of disabling the election machines. this is important information. >> greg: you know what phishing is, right? it's just trying to get your password. people mistake fishing for hacking. it's preying on people who aren't changing their passwords. >> kimberly: "watters world" ." >> jesse: that's my password. >> kimberly: how did she get through this? top secret security. and she said if we were at war with the iranians, she would be with the mullahs. it doesn't get worst than that. a seventh grader can go online and -- >> greg: can we defend her on one thing? unlike snowden and chelsea manning, who dumped thousands and millions of documents, indiscriminate do

stone said he had communicated with wikileaks founder, julian assange. later that month he predicted it would be podes stas time in the barrel and later said he was talking about business dealings and then in october is when he wikileaks started releasing podesta e-mail. podesta saying he doesn't blame the obama administration for dropping the pal in the russian interference. >> i think the president and the entire administration were dealing with an unprecedented incidence of the weaponization of the fruits of russian cyberactivity and i think they were trying to make the best judgments they could on behalf of the american people. >> by the way, in addition to the remarks about assange last year, it shows roger stone had some communication with gussy fer 2.0 who claimed credit for hacking the democratic national committee's e-mail. there's a lot for roger stone and the house committee to sit down and discuss the end of july. >> behind closed doors. you get a sense if it's involving roger stone he might find a way to make it more of a circus. >>> could t