jillian: you can change wikipedia your self. >> who fact checks wikipedia?hat a joke, wikipedia can be written and edited by anyone. they say if this happens there is going to be a lag in the change of fact checking blurbs so they might fact check it before changes within the youtube video. those that are a little skeptical of the climate change thing won't care about the wikipedia thing and wondering why youtube is doing this. rob: alexandria ocasio-cortez is mortified at the thought of debating ben shapiro. >> ben shapiro conservative commentator, he challenged democratic socialist alexandria ocasio-cortez to a debate yesterday and even said he would donate $10,000 to her campaign if she accepted. take a listen. >> you think republicans are afraid to debate you are talk to your discuss the issues. not only am i eager to discuss the issues that i will offer $10,000 to your campaign today for you to come on sunday special. >> this sparked a big debate. ocasio-cortez says just like cats calling i don't owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad

they decided this one subject needs a link to the wikipedia page.usually pretty good, but this page has been captured by the alarmists and it's very one-sided. >> tucker: so what does it tell you when the people in charge don't allow dissent on a topic? what does it tell you about them? why wouldn't they allow free debate if they are confident they are right? >> to be fair, they are allowing the debate. they are not censoring me. we are sending a signal that this guy, he may be misleading you about global warming. it you check wikipedia. so i'm happy. they can sense or anybody they want. it's a private platform. i don't want them to and i think the consumers will punish them if they do but that would be their right. so far they are only saying this is a notice, check out wikipedia. >> tucker: we want to put that up on a screen to give our viewers some sense of what we are talking about. so here's a video you put up that includes this show and the warning says global warming, also known as climate change is the observe century scale rise in the avera

>> not not a disclaimer but a link to the wikipedia page for global warming.ther controversial stuff hasn't required a disclaimer but global warming stories do. >> tucker: what are you said that youtube, google, believes is so unacceptable they need to flag it and warn viewers you're probably lying? >> this week when i discovered it was on mine i thought it was about me but they're putting it on everybody's posts that talk about global warming. decided this needs a link to the wiki pediapage but this page has been captured by the alarmists and it's very one-sided. >> tucker: what does it tell you when the people in charge don't allow dissent on a topic? why wouldn't they allow a free debate if they're so confident they're right? >> they're allowing the debate. they're not censoring. they're sending a signal this stossel guy may be misleading you about global warming and check wikipedia. look, it's a public platform and so far they're only saying this is eye -- a notice. check out wikipedia. >> tucker: we'll put it up on the screen so give viewers a sense of wh

wikipedia in particular looking at wikipedia discussion on entry is a really good way to get a sense of the lay of the land, not just what we know but where areas of contention are and where people who contend different views of ideas come from. it has a representation problem. some elements can be toxic but wikipedia is proof that even warts and all, all the foibles of human behavior can create cooperative ventures in terms of their scope, influence and quality, wikipedia is a high-quality resource in almost every domain. >> host: corey from tulsa, oklahoma, go ahead. >> caller: i was impressed with the clip that west point is using your book and it is high school in florida, a read of your book. what is your hope they take away from your book when they read it? >> guest: "little brother" is meant to make technical information very powerful. it is meant to be standalone as a work of art, it entertains you and makes you feel all the feels but there are urgent technical questions like how crypto works and what the limits are and capabilities and whether it is ever appropriate for the

have a wikipedia page. they took down my wikipedia page.o fallacious, they take articles that they quote unquote source. lies.rom total we try to edit it. we tried to get people within wikipedia to edit it. we tried to get new chapters at colleges and high schools in the -- inry at her said, i the administration say we don't want to, you embrace white supremacists. but we have candace islands. -- candace owens. >> they say i'm anti-black, anti-semitic, every anti-in front of my name. i read this stuff and say i hate this person. stories, onvorite wikipedia, my age number changes. i finally went to wikipedia and said, i'm not 22. he said, you are not 22? you wrote that three years ago. it's something you logically know can -- you logically know is going to change. i'm going to get older. it still says i'm 22. >> the tech companies are a more serious issue. i think you know. yesterday on twitter, gavin mcinnis got banned. they were banned on apple, facebook, and spotify and youtube. same time. that shows the coordinated effort which is the mo

we will make tv like wikipedia makes articles.onest test between that and paying for the stuff you want and while amassing netflix is perfect for the other companies, they all deserve criticism in various ways. every single one of them. but, netflix did create the thing that a lot of people called peak tv. sunday will have peak social media, search that isn't completely stuffed to the gills with fake people that say garbage and manipulative rankings and all this stuff. the motivation, the incentives have to be changed so that doesn't that put the absolute center of everything. so, please at least consider it. free yourself to free us all. that is the top. [applause] >> okay, we are going to do a little bit more music and then we would do questions. if i've absolutely covered everything to infinity and there's no questions, we will adjust to music after that. [inaudible] i don't expect that to be so. [inaudible] ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ [applause] >> okay, you guys stand here. this is how this is going to work. i'm going to take some qu

that's the wikipedia page from 2016 which we have screen shotted on the bottom and the paragraph from steve caulk on the top which is exactly the same. in case you want to clip and save it as a reminder of how the trump administration was on it, considering people for jbs like running the u.s. army in the transition when the only time they made sense and stopped misspelling basic single syllable words is when they were copying and pasting directly from wikipedia. like freshmen. actually freshmen are nice. they don't deserve that. i'm sorry. before you get in trouble and realize you can't do that. you will get caught. so as the manafort case goes to the jury, the big question is how the jury will decide manafort rfort's case. there are still elements of the case that are under seal. they had no spectators allowed in the courtroom and again for two hours this morning. we have no idea what that was about or why it was sealed. informed speculation who know how the trials tend to go suggesting there might be an issue the defense raised about something going wrong with the jury? after the d

wikipedia is an expression of that time.nd was promoted to beautiful people with tremendous sincerity. at the same time that was happening, there is this other countervailing idea that was also becoming more and more powerful than that was the idea that there were certain special people and these people might've been the super hackers for the super entrepreneurs coming of steve jobs and because they could hack so well and they were so good at computer stuff they could change the course of history the way jobs put it, he said you could dance the universe. we are the magic people, the superheroes. people really love their hacker heroes. they loved figures like steve jobs. so you are saying we have these super people and a lot of them are entrepreneurs that you want everything to be free. super entrepreneur, free. how do you get those two things to reconcile? is this extreme socialism with extreme libertarianism. where is the meeting point? nobody's ever articulated another point services like google and facebook was born with

wikipedia >> guest: 60 not of 100,000. a very small percentage. >> host: gretta goodwin taking your calls and questions. dale is up first in chesapeake beach, maryland, a republican. go ahead. >> caller: i wanted to make a couple quick comments. 2017 or during the election there was a lot of backlash about the border wall and how much it was going to cost and a waste of money, i heard $10-$20 billion. obviously a border wall wouldn't stop all illegal immigration, but if we are talking 3 to $4 billion a year costing our government, state, local and federal, to get these people through the justice system it sounds like that would pay for that wall over 5 to 10 years. on top of that a question about the study regarding what is criminal or not, isn't crossing the border illegal itself, a violation of the law? does that not get counted whether someone is classified as a criminal illegal alien? >> host: start with the second question first. >> guest: crossing the border illegally is considered a crime. when we did our study we l

>> i think the idea that -- wick midda -- wikipedia in particular, looking at dates -- discussions ontries is a good way to get the lay of the land, not just what we know but a topic, where the areas of contention are and we are the people who contend different views of different ideas come from. it's not without problems, has a representation problem. there are elements that can be toxic but wikipedia is proof that even worst and all all the human behavior can be set aside to create cooperative ventures that beggar the imagination, wikipedia remains high-quality resource in almost every domain. >> here is david from tulsa, oklahoma, corey doctorrow, go ahead. >> i was impressed with the clip and high school in florida also read of your book, what is your hope that they take away from your book when they read it? >> yeah, little brother is meant to make a lot of technical information palatable. it's meant to be entertaining, stand alone as work of art, as thing that entertains you and makes you feel all the feels but there are the urgent technical questions of how crypto works and how

out this part of steve calk's qualification memorandum was just copied directly word for word from wikipedia which is why it makes sense as opposed to everything else he wrote. just cut and pasted from the role and responsibilities, r-o-l-e. there's the paragraph from steve calk on top which is exactly the same. we posted them on the screen in case you want to clip and save that and post it on your refrigerator as a reminder how exactly the trump administration was on it considering people for jobs like running the u.s. army when the only time they made sense and stopped misspelling even very basic single syllable words was when they were copying and pasting directly from wikipedia like freshmen. actually freshmen are nice. they don't deserve that, i'm sorry. it's before you get in trouble and you realize you can't do that, you'll get caught. so as the manafort case goes to the jury, the big question is how the jury will decide manafort's fate. but there are other mysteries this case opened along the way. there are still elements of this case under seal. the judge held a closed hearing with

so instead i will never understand the double standard to why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal contact regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that has there. now been added a small reference to it but these tweets the controversy surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue with the pedia seems to make efforts to minimize that a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech americans just don't see eye to eye now the new york times issued a statement defending its decision to hire sarah junk it said that she had simply used the same language as online russ's had to respond to them also herself said the way those comments were meant to be satirical following news of a twitter suspension activists candice owens was confronted on the street by anti fascist protesters. owens was having breakfast with another conservative activist colleague when they were harassed by proteste

candor so did i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal content regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that there has now been added a small reference to it but these tweets the controversy surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue we could pedia seems to make efforts to minimize that so it seems that many people are looking at this case and looking at the statements that sarah john has made regarding white people and saying that this is a double standard so a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech americans just don't see eye to eye following use of her twitter suspension candace owens was confronted on the street until she protests. i. was having breakfast with another conservative activist colleague when protesters gathered nearby demonstrators can be seen throwing drinks and shouting stop supremacies calling them racis

white candor so i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal contact regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that has there. has now been added a small reference to it but sarah john there are these tweets the controversy surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue with the p.d.f. seems to make efforts to minimize that a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech americans just don't see eye to eye on the new york times or issued a statement defending its decision to hire sarah jo is it should simply use the same language just trolls who are racially insulting her on twitter and to remarks were satirical following the use of her to dispense an activist chemist's owens was harassed on the street by anti fascist protesters. as was having breakfast at the time with another conservative activist colleague when they were confronted demonst

so in stupid i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal content rich.

now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal content regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets however u.s. media has been covering the controversy regarding her tweets and her statements about white people pretty widely but yet we can pedia and it's editors seem to want to minimize that on her page causing quite a bit of debate and controversy regarding with the p.d. of the internet encyclopedia so it seems that many people are looking at this case and looking at the statements that sarah john has made regarding white people and saying that this is a double standard that these comments are not tolerated about other ethnic groups why should they be tolerated about white people so a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech and americans just don't see eye to eye show i think it's kind of that was a kind of mocking for us there in new york. well following news of her twitter suspension kind of seven's was attacked on the

counter so instead i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal content regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that there has now been added a small reference to it but you know sara john that these tweets the controversies surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue with the pedia seems to make efforts to minimize that so it seems that many people are looking at this case and looking at the statements that sarah jiang has made regarding white people and saying that this is a double standard so a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech and americans just don't see eye to eye rolling news of her twitter suspension candice owens was confronted on the street. protests. owings was coming breakfast with another conservative activist colleague and protesters gathered nearby that the teachers could be seen throwing drinks and chanting stop

white candor so i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal contact regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that there has now been at.

counter so instead i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal contact regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that there has now been added a small reference to it but sarah john that. these tweets the controversy surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue with the pedia seems to make efforts to minimize that a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech americans just don't see eye to eye the new york times issued a statement defending its decision to hire sarah junket said she simply used the same language just trolls who were racially insulting her on twitter and that her remarks were satirical telling news of a twitter suspension activists can disowns was harassed on the street by protesters . having breakfast with another conservative activist colleague when they were confronted demonstrators could be seen shouting abuse as they c

now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal content regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that there has now been added a small reference to it but these tweets the controversy surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue we could pedia seems to make efforts to minimize that so it seems that many people are looking at this case and looking at the statements that sarah john has made regarding white people and saying that this is a double standard so a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech and americans just don't see eye to eye following news over twitter suspension can disowns was confronted on the streets by factious protest this was. owens was having breakfast with another conservative activist colleague when protesters gathered nearby demonstrate his could be seen during some shouting stop white supremacist including the racists the split with the on the scene. as for you journalist to even do a

is so stupid i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal content regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that there has now been added a small reference to it but these tweets the controversy surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue we could pedia seems to make efforts to minimize that so it seems that many people are looking at this case and looking at the statements that sarah john has made regarding white people and saying that this is a double standard so a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech and americans just don't see eye to eye following the news of the dispenser and kindness owens was confronted on the streets by fascist protesters. i. was having breakfast with another conservative activist colleague when protesters gathered nearby the demonstrators can be seen throwing drinks and shouting stop one supremacy als

is so stupid i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question. now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal content regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that there has now been added a small reference to it but these tweets the controversy surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue we could pedia seems to make efforts to minimize that oh a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech and merican it's just don't see eye eye to. reporting now well the new york times did issue a statement defending its decision to hire a savage young they say she just she's the same languages online harasses did to respond to them following news of her tweets a suspension activist candace owens was thanking fronted on the street by anti fascist protests this. is having right to say with another who said to his colleague when they were harassed by protesters demonstrators could be seeing chanting i

so reduced it i will never understand the double standard why it's acceptable to so many now the wikipedia page of the new york times journalist is also in question now the page simply describes her as a journalist and has minimal content regarding the controversy surrounding her tweets it appears that there has now been added a small reference to it but these tweets the controversy surrounding them seems to be quite a big issue we could pedia seems to make efforts to minimize that so it seems that many people are looking at this case and looking at the statements that sarah john has made regarding white people and saying that this is a double standard so a lot of debate yet another example of how in the united states when it comes to issues of race and free speech americans just don't see eye to eye following news of suspension can disowns was confronted on the street by protests. i. was having breakfast with another conservative activist colleague and protesters gathered by demonstrators can be seen throwing drinks and shouting white supremacist and calling them racists police were quick

reportedly blacklist sensitive searches and filter out all websites blocked by china censors like wikipedias. the censorship will extend to google's image search, spellcheck and suggested search features. lea: and tristan. the talk about facebook also be joining the fight against screen addiction now helping people block themselves. >> a problem a lot of people have a facebook will sue much you know if you're spending too much time on its ab. users will see an activity board located within both facebook and instagram maps. it will track how much time you're spending on the apps and alert you once you've had a self-imposed time limit. this is the problem a lot of these social media companies help create that addiction to their platform. cheryl: and now they're saying they want help us get on addicted. you can push okay i keep sneezing. cheryl: talk about this one. drinkers are no longer reaching for. what are they turning to instead? >> will get to that in a minute. drinkers chose just 49.7% of the time last time down from 60% in the mid-90s. for the first time from the drinkers are more lik

i do you to get on wikipedia and play things white people can take credit for, really hard. the times said in a statement her journalism and the fact she is a young asian woman made her a subject of frequent online harassment. for appear go of time she responded that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers. she sees this approach only served to feed the vitriol. she regrets it and the times does not condone it. and she understand how hurtful they seem out of context. is a woman of color she has faced torrents of online hate such as if i saw you i would talk you in your lesbian face, shut the blank up, you dog eating -- dredging up offensive tweets, and they parted company. after an uproar over homophobic slurs with white supremacist. the atlantic hired and quickly fired national's kevin williamson over controversial tweets like the law should treat abortion like any other homicide. williamson said today places like the times should hold the line against mass hysteria and mob mentality of social media. most journalists have a path if it is used against them. if