judge wilkinson: we will allow the chief justice to exit. >> [indiscernible] [laughter] judge wilkinson: i wouldn't put it that way. bill: these conferences don't just happen. they do not occur by themselves. there are two people here i want to particularly thank. unfortunately, the people from our office in richmond had to leave. i would appreciate it if you waited -- would join me in giving them a round of thanks for what they have done. [applause] with regard to your trip back come i just want to share a story that was told to me this morning by my waiter. i was talking to him and he said, you know, i know you all are heading back. i want to tell you about the expense i had. i was driving from west virginia toward virginia the other day. it was a sunny day. the sky was blue. the sun was out. got carried away and i was going 80 in a 70 mile an hour zone good i left west virginia and came into virginia and come as soon as a got into virginia, there was a trooper on the side of the road. it was too late to slow down. the trooper pulled in and started following me. i was are going 80 so

mills's lawyer, beth wilkinson was in her with there.eatedly clashed saying the questions were beyond the scope of what the judge had allowed. i can't ask that. there was a lot of that going on. >> she doesn't, this is really difficult issue for her. she didn't want to answer these questions because either she's completely corrupt or she is completely inept. and even if benghazi happened at same time, even if the argument was, well there was this flood of benghazi you're telling me that the state department is ill-prepared then to both follow of law and to handle a tragedy that occurs where -- so what is it? are you corrupt, are you hiding something? is there potential indictment that is going to happen here? or are you telling us you were just incapable of doing your job and you weren't familiar with the law? either way this doesn't look good for her. there is no escape route. >> i thought surprising thing that came out, they never considered the idea how they would comply with the freedom of information act. this came about because of

. >> and here with the celebrity scoop you could ever want, is amy wilkinson. >> hi, guys. >> busy weekend you. so, demi lovato and wilmer valderrama, they broke up? >> they broke up after nearly six years dating. they released a joint statement saying it was a difficult decision to make. but that they decided they were better off as friends. >> okay. >> any idea of why they suddenly came to that? >> no. it seems like they were going to they talked about marriage in the past. >> i thought they were engaged. >> they've been on and off for many years. i'm not sure what happened there. but demi was spotted out saturday night at a usc event looking happy. >> usually they break up before the statement comes out. >> maybe she's just over it now. >> maybe they both are. we wish them the best. >> we to. taylor swift did surprise action at someone's wedding. >> i love this story. it's so darling. taylor swift crashed a new jersey couple's wedding to perform "blank space." the groom's sister reached out to taylor swift a few months ago. their mother had died. his sister worked it out that taylor cou

my name is emily anderson with wilkinson barker and i am interested in the required -- what we call it -- the advertising goals and be required health warnings and labels that are required? can you speak more on that and affectt would advertising and broadcasting in other media? there are no advertising restrictions in the deeming but the warnings would be required. what is your question on laboring? labeling's, would that have any effect on the broadcast in general? that ought to not have an impact but networks have their own guidelines. >> the ruling is different to the ones on existing tobacco products. nicotine is an addictive chemical, so it is much different from saying this product may cause some sort of diseases. in a sense, the differentiated warning might be better. but any warning that discourages people from switching, i think, we should be concerned about. >> would there be any effects from the restrictions on modified risk claims? >> absolutely. you couldn't discuss in advertising that your product is lower relative risk or that even it doesn't contain certain components.