when william buckley attacked pat buchanan and said i can't defend you against charges of anti-semitismservative movement of that particular play. my liberal friends are not doing a good enough job of marginalizing extreme left. move on, code pink, all of those things that are helping to destroy the democratic party, the libera liberal movement, and ultimately america. >> does the government have the response ability to protect those places of worship? >> of course. separation of church and state can't ever be absolute. the church, and the synagogue are part of society. it is a balance. it's a matter of degree. >> but what about without the government being involved, these families, these advocates who speak up for it, used to be part and parcel of education. >> i love your writing about morality, but i don't want professors and universities on high schools to be teaching students what to think. i want them to teach how to think because if you want to teach them what to think they are not going to teach them what you want. they're going to teach them what the radical left wants so i wor

john birch society back when i was a little child, and the true conservative movement led by william f. buckley and barry goldwater and others kept their distance from that. - right. - and then, little by little, people running the republican party didn't keep their distance so much and allowed that conspirasism to seep into the mainstream, and by the way, it's not only the right. - well, there's left conspirasism, right? - sure, but it is, the bad consequences of fantasyland that i talk about politically are disproportionately right. - or at least at the moment they are. - exactly. we'll do the sequel in 10 years where the left has gone completely crazy. - it occurs to me that one great example of this or topic of conversation around this would be climate change or climate science. - [kurt] yes, yes. - where it's such false equivalency. 97% of the world believes that this is a thing, or more. 2% doesn't, we have to leave it there. - yeah, teach the controversy. - right, he said, she said. - and again, i didn't really, until i started doing the research for this book, didn't realize to what deg

i i think william buckley was disinvited from baser 20 years ago. i mean these things happen. you book the wrong band. it's a party. i don't think speakers usually have much to do about inquiry. and some schools maybe the rules are good or bad in different states, universities are in the entertainment business, and therefore they're in the crowd control business. and at really big schools like northwestern and berkeley, they deal with crowd control all the time. usually around athletics, and that's just part of the administrative's nightmarish responsibilities, i guess. but i do think having a broader range of ideas on the faculty would probably be a good thing. i'm agreeing to what carroll said before about having a broad range of perspectives. again, it's going to be managed. i don't think it's a free market of hiring. i used to do a lot of interviewing at aha. got my first job in washington in 1982. and i got my first job because the guy who interviewed me, thank goodness whereby was, was. at least i claimed to have swum, and that led to get an interview. it's not a marketp

or so, the conservative media business and its flagship, national review magazine founded by william f. buckley, had a particular view of conservatism that they advocated for. a view which actually won. they were originally founded as a magazine that criticized eisenhower, that was very critical at various points of richard nixon, but then saw their fulfillment in ronald reagan. - ronald reagan was the apex, right? - everything that they really wanted to see in a candidate, someone who rejected the kissingerian, nixonian view of the world, who believed that the cold war was something to be won. in the wake of that, you had this zombie reaganism, according to a lot of different conservative thinkers, which is basically seeing the world in the same 1980s frame that allowed for fusionism of social conservatism and fiscal conservatism, hawkish foreign policy to dictate the direction for the republican party. a fusionism that really maintained itself all the way through the george w. bush years with islamic terrorism and that force as the substitute for the cold war and the soviets. that fusionism t

we publish william f buckley and russell kirk with the conservative mind, witness and all of those are still in print today. >>host: does that say something about the publishing industry? >> definitely. and henry regnery recognize that in the market space that is a published book but that is also because they are part of the mission. >>host: who are some of the authors published today? >> the leading rights in the conservative movement, dinesh desousa, and a whole host of others. >> if you put and coulter out to does it sell automatically because of her name? >> it certainly helps. but i can't tell you any book is a guarantee of success anymore. as the book business has changed over the past 12 years a lot more of the business has gone online. so you lose that opportunity to visualize and publish those books visually and also lose the sense of discovery people have had for generations or finding the book they didn't know existed or an author they did not know about before. so frankly it is more pressure on publishers to help people know that a book exist if there isn't a celebrity auth

ed "lonely he says in his introduction that william f buckley junior once said americans shall not remember why lincoln was locked until we come to understand why he was hated. until lincoln was loved we come to understand why he was hated. , as williamho whorsen said, even those commemorated or tried to memorialize secretly harbored a wish for his demise. have is aat we thought of when this dislike of lincoln began and i think it is true, even before he was elected president, and throughout his administration, certainly his political outlook in contrast to slaveholders contributed to this, his reliance on thomas jefferson's declaration of , clearlynce republicans supported him, antiwar democrats called copperheads despised him, especially since they believed, becausehe southerners .e subverted the constitution overview,general which i think we all get and understand, even if we do not accept this dislike of our 16th president. what about particular enemies administration? i've asked our panelists to give a two or three minute overview of what they would like to discuss to get us going, esp

he said in his introduction that william f. buckley, jr. once said americans shall not remember why lincoln was loved until we come to understand why he was hated. both emotions were shown after his assassination in 1865. even those who, as william petersen said, even those who commemorated or tried to memorialize his death with crepe and bunting secretly harbored a wish for his demise. i think what we have is a thought on when this dislike of lincoln began. and i think it is true, even before he was elected president, and deep and throughout his administration. certainly, lincoln's political outlook, in contrast to slaveholders contributed to this, his reliance on thomas jefferson's declaration of independence, which he thought superseded the constitution -- or should at least be read together. and his acts as president, clearly the republicans supported him, antiwar democrats called copperheads despised him, especially since they believed, as did the southerners, because he subverted the constitution. especially in the suspension of the wr

william f. buckley was disinvited. these things happen. you book the wrong band. it is a party. i don't think speakers have usually much do with inquiry and at some schools because maybe the lawyes are good or bad in different states universities are in the entertainment business and therefore they are in the crowd control business. and you know, at really big schools, they deal with crowd control all the time usually around athletics and that is just part of the administratoads nightmarish responsibilities i guess. but i think having a broader range of ideas on the faculty especially humanities and social sciences would probably be a good thing. i'm agreeing with what carol said before about having a broad range of perspectives. again, it will be managed, i don't think it is a free market of hiring, that is that people hire -- i used to do a lot of interviewing at the aha, got my first job in aha in washington in 1982, and you know, i got my first job because the guy who interviewed me thank goodness was a swimmer. and i swam. at least i claimed to have swum. and that led to me

william s buckley was disinvited from vassar 30 years ago. you book the wrong band, these things happen. it's the party. i don't think speakers have much to do with inquiry. at some schools, because maybe laws are good or bad in some states universities are in the , entertainment business and therefore in the crowd control business. at really big schools like northwestern and berkeley, they deal with crowd control all the time, usually around athletics. that is part of the administrative nightmarish responsibilities. i am agreeing with what carroll said before about having a broad range of perspective it's. i don't think it is a free market of hiring. a's to do a lot of interviewing at my first job in washington in 1982. i got the job because the guy who interviewed me and was a swimmer. i swam, at least i claimed to. that led to me getting an interview. it is not like a marketplace through which the best people get chosen. there are various filters. i thought by raising the issue of political bias in the classroom, i thought i would create m

and he says in his introduction that william f. buckley jr. once said that americans shall not remember why lincoln was loved until we come to understand why he was hated. and both emotions were certainly displayed after his assassination on april 14, 1865. even those who, as william peterson said, merril peterson in his great book, even those who commemorated, or tried to memorialize his death with crepe and bunting secretly harbored a wish for his demise. so i think what we have is a thought on when this dislike of lincoln began. and i think -- i think it's true, or it occurred even before he was elected president, and deep and throughout his administration. certainly lincoln's political outlook in contrast to slave holders contributed to this, his reliance on thomas jefferson's declaration of independence which he thought was even superceded and was superior to the constitution, or at least had to be read together. and of course his acts as president clearly, the republicans supported him. anti-war democrats called copperheads despised him,

buckley. nicole, francis bowyer, nicholas bright, daniel solomon browner. colleen renÉ bruner. timothy guy berman. michael warren buser. warren max busear. stephen butler. william kennedy. timothy michael caldwell. carlson, richard anthony coley. eric michael kocher. jason michael kocher. gary leonard. bridget, sean, thomas concanon. >> theodorea cohen. tracy jane corner. willis, patricia mary quayle. john bennink come, william manion daniels, gretchen, shannon davis, gabriel dellarepa. frank dinardo. peter thomas stanley dicks. >> scott marsh corey. david scott gorski. michael joseph doyle. edgar howard eggleston. charles thomas fisher 4 rebecca. clayton flick. john patrick flynn. arthur, robert jared fortune. stacy denise franklin. paul matthew stephen friedman. >> cara reagan. james ralph buller. robertin, gabor, alan gallagher, matthew cannon gannon. tennis raymond. paul isaac garrett. kenneth james gibson. william david junior. all of leonora gordon. linda susan gordon. madeleine, loretta and gordon-. >> david j goals. andrzej nikolai, nicole james, lorraine francis walsh. lynn carol, pamela elaine herbert, rodney peter hilbert, alfred hill, catherine augu