referred to it as a name on behalf of my good friend and co-commander of that expedition, lieutenant william clark, so these are but a few of the many, many plants. now, mind you, lewis and clark also sent me many, many dried plants that they had sewn into pages of books, and i immediately sent those plants and seeds to a professor of horticulture and botany at the university of pennsylvania. captain lewis had studied with him before he embarked on that expedition, and so it was that those plants became most useful for further study. i have always believed that botany is foremost among the sciences. your next question, mr. light? stephen: well, mr. jefferson, it is quite clear you have extensive gardens here, and someone asks how many plants you have in the garden. mr. jefferson: how many plants do i have in the garden? i would reckon to say if you're speaking of flowers, upwards of 330 varieties. of vegetables, much near the same. the vegetables, i cultivate 1000 foot of garden divided into 24 sections in which i cultivate various vegetables, so to state them precisely, i daresay we would be here

i mean she was instrumental earlier in the presidency in the removal of william clark as the first nationalecurity adviser, because she felt he took too hard align against the soviets. she wasn't the only one, but she played a big role. there >> a few stories that really demonstrator political intent on behalf of her husband and her influence inside the white house. >> it's what we said earlier about her being the personal director. it was a personal director -- somebody said that human resources department in the personal director for the president. january 1989, they turned or the white house to mr. reagan's vice president, the bushes george h. w. bush. and we have about 15 minutes to talk about a very long post presidency. as we said at the beginning, that was marked fairly soon with the announcement president reagan's alzheimer's. >> before that, in very sort short order, this memoir came out. this was just a 1989, so she clearly been working on it during at least the latter part of house white house. here's >> my turn is the name of it. so her turn out wet? how did she use this book? w

thomas clark from william blair investment management is our guest. chancellorthe u.k.t to unveil his measures to reinvigorate the economy. will it be enough to drag the u.k. audited steepest slump in centuries? and more immediately important, what libby to markets? this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ 40 minutes until the start of european equity trading. futures look negative. a little catch up to do with the losses made on wall street yesterday. the u.k. chancellor gives an update on the economic response to the pandemic. he's expected to announce a 2 billion pound steam to create more jobs for young people. the treasury is supporting more than 12 million jobs. guest is still with us. let's come to you and your thoughts on the u.k.. the bank of england saying that as much as half as the u.k. workforce is unemployed or underemployed. we know that a substantial number of people are being paid by the treasury right now. this is underlying the challenge for the chancellor. how will the treasury stop unemployment from spiking? how do they prevent a cliff edge? is that the big question?

they were tom, clark john marshall harlan the second, and william oh douglas. these were called concurrent since. why did they pick a time to do that? >> they all had their reasons to write separately. i think for justice clark, it was for him, the real reason, is that the court had already extended the right to capital cases, and he did not see a difference between capital cases and non capital cases, because the due process protects your life and your liberty. for justice necklace, it was a very specific reason. as i alluded to earlier, he and justice black had a unique approach to the incorporation of the bill of rights, and it is a little bit of an irony that justice black, who has this distinctive view, because he is a sign the majority opinion -- he can't fully embrace that in the majority opinion. so justice black does it for him in a concurring opinion. but justice harlan's opinion and some respects as i think the most interesting and his vote in the majority is maybe the most surprising. and he has a line in his concurrence the effect that the court is

in addition to the one we talked about earlier, joseph mckenna, william day, james reynolds, john clarker name that rings about with me is lewis. was this a distinguished court? why do we know more about the supreme justices at that time? >> the court response to transitional questions. in the locker era the supreme court is recognizing a broader set of rights. liberty of contract and becoming more assertive. being more willing to strike down laws that congress has enacted. in terms of the personalities of the justices and who is popular. the members of the court don't shine out. it's because combs has effective way of writing. a clear danger. the phrases we heard from schenk our once that ring through history. that's why we remember homes in addition to his contributions to the law. >> we're going to learn more about william holmes and his own bibliography and howard could have effective his thoughts they brought to the case. let's watch. >> the civil war affected homes with an understanding that a nation couldn't be at peril. you had to restrain every part of the national fabric to pr

on thesteps of the courthouse facing jim clark and john lewis and jose williams who faced such evil on. >> amen to that. i want to ask you about the tweet that you posted yesterday. it was a very personal moment. you said when i visited uncle john last week so just last week. i looked in his eyes and said well done. i told him that i loved him and that we are going to continue to fight. that must have been such an extraordinary moment for you to have that time with him. what did that feel like? >> it was a powerful moment. i was there with my cousin dr. angela ferris watkins who is the daughter of my father's living sister still and her daughter and a friend of mine delease and we prayed with lihim in that moment and we talked with him and prayed with him. and it was a powerful moment and i knew that day that he had served well, that he had done well, that he had fought well and fought long and now deserved his rest and so rest in peace, uncle john your legacy is very strong and we will continue what my father started, my mother started, so many of those people in that movement and wha

he looks frankfort, or william oh douglas, robert jackson, harold burton and tom clark. and the minority, chief justin vincent voted -- justices stanley reid and sherman mint. and we're going to return to another earl argument. this is from one of the other clerks, his name is george, and an exchange between justices jackson and clark about their decision in this case. let's listen. >> after they announced the decision at that time, at the time clark sat on one side of jackson, probably on the left, and tom clark announced his concurrence and i don't remember whether he ruled the opinion or not. the jackson leaned over to him and whispered, i'm glad to see that you've decided to be a judge, tom. now jackson told me that. >> you reacted when you heard that. >> it was very interesting, yes. and of course jackson is talking about this from his own experience. he was an attorney general and roosevelt during which time he made some arguments very similar to those he is about to reject in this case. same thing happened in korematsu. and for jackson it was very important to rec

it happened after the conference, it was tom clark who wrote the mapp decision, he was in an elevator with william flynn brennan and hugo black. and he turned to them and he said, i think that this might be a good case to overturn this decision in wolf v. colorado. >> and the reason why he said that was when they met in conference to originally talk about the case, the whole issue of the obscenity clause dominated the conversation. all nine justices said this obscenity statute is unconstitutional. violates the first and 14th amendment, but justice douglas raised the issue as to whether or not the circumstances of this case in this illegal search would be a really good vehicle to revisit the decision and wolf versus colorado. tom clark was thinking of this when he left the conference, and that's when he introduced the idea to them and they said, are you serious about? this and he said, yeah, i think so. so he had been really thinking about turning this into a fourth amendment. question >> they said are you serious but also indicated that they might be persuaded if he took it in that direction. >> a

vivian was 95 years old, stood up to jim clark in se lma, alabama and john lewis walked over the bridge with jose williams and was beaten as we just heard once again profusely and so many things that john lewis has done for our nation and world. neil: you know, pastor, thinking of your dad this day, and of course his his herrizing speech of the march on washington but what a lot of people forget is one of the earlier speakers was this young up and coming john lewis, and the rumor was that your dad wanted to tone down what was seemingly a more wouldn't call it a militant speech as much as a more in your face speech he was an impair impatient restless young man and your dad said we have to dial this back if we want to work with the jfk administration, and we want to continue building on this progress. it's an interesting footnote on that historic day. >> well it certainly is. john lewis at 23 and dad i guess in his 30s, they were very close , i mean not a huge gap but certainly a gap and i think dad understood how we had to carefully navigate through a very difficult set of circumstances. not the john lewis