also being released this week, kevin schultz explores the relationship between william f. buckley, jr. and norman mailer in "buckley and mailer" you can watch the professor discuss his book during booktv's live coverage of the chicago lit fest of the weekend of june 6 and 7. and finally, in defense of selfish is in next ayn rand's institute argues that truly selfish people live honest, productive and self-respecting lives. look for this titles in book stores and watch for the awe theirs on book tv. >> on a sunday afternoon looking live at the u.s. capital where the u.s. senate will be in session in a couple of minutes returning mayoral from the memorial day break to finish unfinished business, making another attempt at extending expiring provisions of the patriot act dealing with the nsa's collection of phone record. here's how they left things last friday before the break and then we'll follow that with quick comments from president obama this past friday. >> we are unable to clear any short-term extensions, and the current law expires at midnight on sunday. so the senate will be

one of them was william f buckley. i maintained a luxury -- lovely correspondence with him. i had come and gone. i helped them get into the internet business. it was clear the charging people for e-mail was not exactly a big business bottle -- model anymore. i got a bunch of angry e-mails from reporters. the honest answer is it was time for that service to go. i have two themes i would like to address this afternoon. the first is technology. i want to talk about policy. i have eight points. let me start with the technology side. i am proud of the fact that the internet continues to evolve. this is one has adapted to new technology and swept newtek knology. it is become an important element of the smart foreign. they are all mutually reinforced in many ways. one of the things that we did not get right is the numerical address space. we did some calculations and estimated that 4.3 billion to be enough. the version of the network that most of you are using is called ip version four. it was designed around that time. we got it wrong. we ran out of the ip version four. the ceo is

the first people to sign up for this electronic mail service were reporters, one of whom was william f. buckley and i maintained a lovely correspondence with bill over time before he passed away, and i remember that i had come and gone to mci left to join bonb kahn. in around 2003 it was clear that charging people for e-mail wasn't exactly a great business model anymore so we shut down the mci mail service, and i got a whole bunch of angry e-mails from reporters who said i have had my mci mail dressaddress since 1983, how can you do that? but the honest answer was it was time for that service to go. so i have two themes that i would like to address this afternoon. the first one has to do with technology, and i will drop into geek a bit. i apologize but it's the only way to be precise. and then i want to talk a little bit about policy. so i have eight points or so on the tech side and four or five points on the policy side. so let me start on the technology side. i'm really proud of the fact that the internet continues to evolve. this is not a design which was fixed in time 40 years ago but rath

even william f. buckley supported a public service for--young people who are 18. i think when you're part of the risk, you're gonna be part of the solution. our founding fathers did not want a professional army. they were very explicit about this. they called it-- we did not want a standing army. and the moment we get awe and a tiny number of people go to fight when they shouldn't be sent to fight because "they're a professional army" doing their job--the moment we have that awe, we surrender to that kind of militarization of our foreign policy. and having been in the army, i can assure you that when you're in the army, navy, air force, or marines, you don't have awe of those people when you get out, because you know too much. >> second question, what are the most important questions you would ask the presidential candidates in the next debate? >> how will you shift power from the few to the many in ways that make it very easy for people to band together as consumers, as workers into democratic trade unions, as small taxpayer groups, and as communities who are bei

the 1st people to sign up for this electronic mail service we will reporters one of whom was william f buckley. i maintain a lovely correspondence before he passed away and remember had come and gone. around 2,003 was clear that charging people for e-mail was not exactly a great business model anymore's. we shut down and made a bunch of angry e-mails from reporters who senate have my e-mail address is 1983. it was time for the service to go. i have to themes. first one has to do with technology. i want to talk a little bit about policy. eight points or eight points or so on the tech side and 45 on the policy side. i'm really proud of the fact that the internet continues to evolve. this is not a design which was fixed in time but rather one that has adapted to knew technology become an important element of the smart phone. one of the things that we did not quite get right was the amount of numerical address space needed. only designed to four years ago we did some calculations and an estimated at 4.3 billion terminations ought to be enough. the version of the network most of you are using is ca

among the first people to sign' for the electronic mail was reporters and one was william f buckley and i maintained talk with bill before he passed away. i remember i had come and gone to mci and left to join other companies and rejoined mci to help them get into the internet business. in 2003 it was clear charging people for e-mail was not a great model. so we shutdown the mci mail service and got angry e-mails from reporters who said i had the address since 1983 how can you do this? but the answer is it was time to go. i have two thing do is address and i will drop into geek. then i will talk about policy. i have eight points on the tech side and four or five on the rule side. i am proud of the fact the internet is continuing to evolve. this has adapted to new technology and developed in with capability and become important parts of the smart phones and world wide web are reinforcing. one thing i didn't get right was the amount of numerical space needed in the internet. when we designed it 40 years ago we did calculations and estimated 4.2 billion terminations ought to be enough. so

the first people to sign up for this electronic mail service or reporters -- one of them was william f buckley. i maintained a lovely correspondence with well before he passed away. i remember that had come and gone to join and then i rejoined mci to help get into the internet business. it was very clear that charging people for e-mail was not a great business model anymore. we shut down the mci mail service and i got a whole bunch of angry e-mails from reporters who said that i had my mci mail address since 1983. how could you do this? the honest answer was that it was time for that service to go. i have two themes that i would like -- themes that i would like to address this afternoon. the first one is technology and i will drop into a geek. i apologize but it is the only way to be precise. then we will talk a little bit about policy. i have a point on the tech side and four or five points on the policy side. let me start on the technology side. i'm really proud of the fact that the internet continues to evolve. this is not a design which was mr. hughes: -- this was not a design which was fi

gary wills used to work for william f. buckley at the "national review" recently described this effort as, they're kept scientists, their rigged conferences their bought publicist publicists. imagine what a little discovery about the scheme of the climate apparatus, about what they're telling each other in private while they scheme to deceive the public. the truth will eventually come to light. it always does. but here in the u.s. senate, we shouldn't wait for a court case before taking action. the evidence is clear. we have a legislative responsibility to address climate change and to do that now. the facts are clear as day right before our eyes despite the fossil fuel efforts to deceive and deny, despite their persistent big political spending and bullying. we just have to wake up to the facts and to our duty. mr. president, i yield the floor a senator: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from louisiana. mr. vitter: thank you mr. president. mr. president, i have an amendment to the iran sanctions bill which is pend