let's analyze this with a former judge william heath. dramatic and fast-moving. very significant words in the last few minutes. >> i agree, very much so. and it was after very careful, although brief analysis of the crux of the matter, and that is, did the accused plan to go and murder his girlfriend? or for that matter, anybody else? that wasn't proved. it's not just a few of accepting the accused's version. that is fatal y vital to the cae prosecution. generally, you would supply the same facts to that in saying that a reasonable man would not have fired the shots. now, that is a very cold approach, which doesn't mean that you're analyzing the objective experiences, and although reasonable fear is subjective, the fact is, would any man have fired shots or would any man not have fired shots? so any man who's using his brain, who's analyzing a thing, would he or would he not not fired the shots? so that's what we're waiting for now. >> so if judge masipa is not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that oscar pistorius is guilty of premeditated murder, just talk us