my classmates from law school, william rehnquist. he had been a good friend. he lived in arizona. i knew his wife as an undergraduate at stanford. there were personal friends of my husband and mine. it was just inconceivable of me that we would be asked to be served at the same time. there are things -- for the small state of arizona to suddenly have two at the same time, it was unimaginable to me. when i was interviewed by william frank smith and some of the cabinet members in the reagan to administration, i did not believe for a minute that would be asked to serve. i went back to arizona after those interviews and said to my husband, how interesting it was

as greg was says, there are extraordinary -- as william rehnquist says, there are expert in very dangerous when you cross over from a the commercial to a political entity. we want business corporations to be out there in fair competition. you have to read adam smith to note that there is nothing more dangerous than when corporations get together and say is we're not going to get it through competition but try to go through the state. host: in chicago, janet on the democratic line. caller: this is a question for mr. raskin. upc touch on what i would consider -- you briefly touched on what i would consider the conservative judicial activism, as far as overturning the laws. in question has to do with -- my

in the first place, already serving on the court, was one of my classmates from law school, william rehnquist. he had been a good friend. he lived in arizona. i knew his wife as an undergraduate at stanford. there were personal friends of my husband and mine. it was just inconceivable of me that we would be asked to be served at the same time. there are things -- for the small state of arizona to suddenly have two at the same time, it was unimaginable to me. when i was interviewed by william frank smith and some of the cabinet members in the reagan to administration, i did not believe for a minute that would be asked to serve. i went back to arizona after those interviews and said to my husband, how interesting it was to visit washington, d.c. and to meet the people around the president and, indeed, to meet the president himself and to talk to him. but i said, thank goodness i do not have to go to that job. i did not want it. and i was not sure that i could do the job well enough to justify trying. i have often said that it is wonderful to be the first to do something, but i did not want to b

for wealth production and a commission, but as greg was says, there are extraordinary -- as william rehnquist says, there are expert in very dangerous when you cross over from a the commercial to a political entity. we want business corporations to be out there in fair competition. you have to read adam smith to note that there is nothing more dangerous than when corporations get together and say is we're not going to get it through competition but try to go through the state. host: in chicago, janet on the democratic line. caller: this is a question for mr. raskin. upc touch on what i would consider -- you briefly touched on what i would consider the conservative judicial activism, as far as overturning the laws. in question has to do with -- my main question has to do with what about multinational corporations, how does this affect where a company is incorporated? i believe halliburton has moved to i believe the united arab emirates. guest: fantastic question. if you want to see democratic populism, watch the populism unleashed by this decision. a supreme court judge determined that corpora

for wealth production and a commission, but as greg was says, there are extraordinary -- as william rehnquists, there are expert in very dangerous when you cross over from a the commercial to a political entity. we want business corporations to be out there in fair competition. you have to read adam smith to note that there is nothing more dangerous than when corporations get together and say is we're not going to get it through competition but try to go through the state. host: in chicago, janet on the democratic line. caller: this is a question for mr. raskin. upc touch on what i would consider -- you briefly touched on what i would consider the conservative judicial activism, as far as overturning the laws. in question has to do with -- my main question has to do with what about multinational corporations, how does this affect where a company is incorporated? i believe halliburton has moved to i believe the united arab emirates. guest: fantastic question. if you want to see democratic populism, watch the populism unleashed by this decision. a supreme court judge determined that corporation