you're not just going willy-nilly on this stuff. >> no, he is, mike, he is going willy-nilly. tell him. >> we do a lot of guessing. >> you do, which is astounding because that means you are calculating this thing in your head largely, right? you've educating guests, right? >> well, we use -- we do more computation than you might -- we usage analogy, we try to estimate things but it's being able to make a decision. >> is it something you can demonstrate to me, okay, i want to give i way $100,000 if someone with a blind fold puts from 20 feet? >> well, it would probably be like clear than you might think, that would be a bad contest for us. >> so i would have to pay a lot to you for you to ensure that one? >> not a lot, but more than you might think you would have to. >> i think the obvious is why aren't you playing poker. you are the best bridge player in the world or one of them, right? >> well, i have been highly rated at one time or another. >> you are one of the best bridge players in the world and you have this incredible understanding of how odds work and you obviously ha

enough jihadists at the moment in america, and too many, and the idea of importanting still more willy-nilly seems to make no sense at all. what exactly one does, and for how long one does it in order to to try to ascertain when more people who are coming from the nations notably those that have a tradition of islamic supreme schism and -- supremism and also those who have a doctrine of shariah, are planning to engage in a violent what is the brotherhood is calling a stealthy kind of jihad rather than the people who are seek to come here for at bert life or economic opportunity or -- >> it sounds like a defactor agreement -- >> we have to get it sorted. >> and it sounds like donald trump. >> well, we should not be willy-nilly in importing more jihadists. >> any points that you disagree with him? >> well, i disagree on the perhaps important distinction, and i argue that there are muslims who do not embrace this doctrine of shariah and at least at the moment are not a threat, and those are the people who u you can probably bring into the country or help become part of the american dream with l

but if you look at the brackets, there's also this willie nilly language.ey thing there is, is it going to tell the markets when they open after this agreement is open, is it going to tell the markets is it the end of fossil fuels? that's what honestly the majority of human beings across the planet want to see. >> reporter: and there seems to be quite a momentum for that here, isn't there? >> yes. there is 100 countries that were announced this morning as part of this high ambition coalition, and that is going to keep pushing us. the key thing is, these governments are here negotiating for the future of the planet. but the people outside are pretty clear. they need that language to be strong. they need an end date. they need it to be before the end of the century. and that element of the deal still in square brackets. >> reporter: as i said earlier, lawrence is trying to get this signed and sealed by 6:00 pm on friday. that seems incredibly unlikely, because within the next 24 hour from now, he would have to pretty well complete it. >> the french have kept

that's something we don't want to have the government authorize companies to use just willy nilly. there have to be some good rules. there were some legislative discussions about it, but the outcome of that was legislature didn't take any action. it is going off this law in the 1990s, the utilities board gets to make the decision. it's a big decision because you're going to say, "can this out of state company force an iowa landowner, many of whom had farms in their family for a long time, give this easement?" there's also the issue with water. that was the financial assurance issue if there is a spill. i don't think this pipeline would be any more likely to spill than any other pipeline. maybe less likely with the scrutiny, but there's still that risk. if there is a spill, what happens to iowa's water? the long term? of course as cheryl mentioned the climate change issue is really important. this is not the type of pipeline iowa has had built. iowa has lots of pipelines. there are lots of pipelines, but this is a little bit different because, significantly different because of the

purposes.s both it allows us to gather the information at the same time without just willy-nilly invadingivil liberties of americans. mark: are you going to be a head soon? when will you go ahead in this race? you kasich: you know this, have stated this for some time. we will compete in iowa. we don't expect to win there, but we will do reasonably well. then we will go to new hampshire. it is ground games that deliver results. we are building out beyond hampshire into south carolina. inare on the ballot virginia, and we are not running out of money. people said he wasn't going to get in, was not going to get on the stage, and all these things are happening. mark: is it your gut that you will go ahead in the public polls? john kasich: i'm not well known, as you know, and the national polls are not the issue. mark: on primary night are you going to shock everybody? : there's still 67 days to go and you will be apple to make a good assessment as to where we are pretty grounded and true to yourself. is there anything you have done in how your treating people are dealing with voters where you

strategies and god bless donald trump, but you can't plead the fifth on certain issues and being willy nilly with your responses. you need a plan and a concrete idea. >> an interesting general answer you gave that the american people want. you don't want to name a candidate you thought did well at least? >> i had trouble visioning cruz as a bad ass. he reminds me of the guy you shove into the locker. when he says uh blight rate these people, i laughed at that. he gained a you lot of points with people. >> cruz is growing on you, right? whole attempt to steal the time from the moderators. let me get in. >> he wouldn't stop talking. he just kept going. >> and then when he gave up he did the little smirk like i tried. i almost have to give you respect for trying at least. like you said i am not getting the bad boy persona. what is great about this debate is it really set apart because it was about foreign policy and terrorism and establishment candidates from nonestablishments. those who are establishments ought to noah lot more about policy and plans and how to destroy isis and how to actually

we have to trust in our judicial system the judge will not be taking guns willy-nilly. that there has to be a significant burden of proof. charles: i don't think there is going to be the sort of deep down vetting in california. i think every judge will go the this at their own pace. if any judge has an agenda, they will collect a lot of guns. >> any society who is willing to give liberty for the sake of security deserves neither and needs both. no due process. that's the problem. >> its doesn't have to be just one person. charles: we are talking about the california law. the bottom line, though, it's a slippery sloach and next year will be one of those tug-of-wars for the second amendment and those who wants to erase it. it might not be a winner this year. however, we have some ways for to you make big-time money in 2015. we'll be right back. we live in a pick and choose world. choose, choose, choose. but at bedtime? ...why settle for this? enter sleep number, and the lowest prices of the season. sleepiq technology tells you how well you slept and what adjustments you c

first of all we don't know and this he a would not saying we are going to investigate every mop willy-nillytexting had 8 times with the terrorists, don't you want to know what they are talking about, josh? >> jesse, absolutely. this is the issue whether it's the boston marathon bomber. all the issues we have in minneapolis. new york, or san bernardino, these clerics are absolutely hiding nefarious activity and hiding quicks with these guys. so we have to conduct surveillance, human intelligence and we have to do it in a targeted manner here, jesse. it's absolutely we have to do this we are not talking about blanket mosque surveillance flannery. >> what did i just hear? i heard him say they are clarngs, unnamed, unspecified shia, whatever. all across america who are are hiding these people. well, okay. probable cause means i have are a do you believe evidence at this mosque cleric a is doing something. i think if we had that we would have prosecuted him or her but we don't why are doing what trump is doing that clown. watch out, close all the mosques. this is a terrible policy. >> we don't n

. >> that was amp ceo tim cook's way of saying we're not going to just willy-nilly start turning overo federal government whenever they want stuff in the middle of the latest terror scare. that doesn't necessarily suit fred flight's security -- the former cia analyst with us right now. what he's saying is you have to make a good case, u.s. government to get this stuff, but the problem with even the latest attackers in san bernardino a few weeks back, their stuff is still encrypted. that's not just through apple but through another vehicle we cannot find out what the heck these guys were communicating. >> that's exactly right and you have to consider that apple and google are not putting these new encryption technologies in place to protect the american people from terrorism or criminals. they're doing this to protect the american people from their own government and this is making it difficult for intelligence agencies to follow terror suspects, making it hard to solve crimes. even a crime in chicago where a father of six was killed and the only clues are two phones, a cell phone -- a

imposing willy-nilly goals and rules that may not even be able to be achieved, while displacing people in the workplace, is not my idea of how you would handle this issue. renewables,er in but i believe in the whole series of energy resources, and i think they need to be exploited. secondly, in terms of trump, i signed a pledge. that's why you have to be careful with pledges you sign. support that i would the republican nominee. is it possible to change your mind? it would take something extreme to do it. i will tell you, sir, there is no way the donald trump is going to be president. i don't even take it seriously. he is not going to win. it's not going to happen. maybe we could all learn a little lesson from all of this. >> thank you. , over 300t 10 years americans have been killed by terrorism. period,ame paper -- over 300,000 americans have died from gun violence. would you support a ban on assault weapons? would you support closing the loophole on gun shows? and would you support a ban on weapons availability to those who are on the no-fly list? mr. kasich: let me say one thing ab

imerring on the right and use fear mongering for climate change or republican guntle or gone control willy-nillys something happens. there is a a little bit on the both sides and has been guilty of it many times. >> we hear today that isis stole tens of thousands of blank passports. inmean, it's worse and worse. but if you listen to president obama, no we have this all -- we have them where we want them. >> we have a strategy. dewon't have them where we want them but do you want to put troops on the ground? the president's point is this threat is not deserving of the loss of tens of thousands of american guys. >> you are a football guy, right? it's the fourth quarter, we are down by 20 and the teach coach is running the ball you trying to figure out when is he going to start blowing. >> we are the strongest in the miller and strongest military those guys are flee fleas. >> down by 20, three hail mary passes we can still win by one. >> the problem is we are in the red zone, people, and americans. you to address it with urgency as if we are in the end zone. >> go georgia. >> thank you. plenty more

just imposing willy-nilly goals and rules that may not be able to be achieved while displacing people in the workplace is not my idea of how you would handle this issue. i'm a believer in renewables, but i believe in the whole series of energy resources, and i think they need to be exploited. secondly, in terms of trump, i signed a pledge. that's why you have to be careful with pledges you sign, that i would support the republican nominee. now, look, is it possible that you change your mind? yeah. it takes something extreme to do it, but i will tell you, sir, there's no way that donald trump's going to be president. i've been saying that for weeks. i don't even take it seriously because he isn't going to win. it's not going to happen. and maybe we can all learn a little less been from all of this. >> another question. >> thank you. allen blank from the washington center. in the last ten years over 3 00 americans have been killed by terrorism. but in the same period, over 300,000 americans have died from gun violence. would you support a ban on assault weapons? would you support closin

constitutional rights of your citizens by not holding police officers accountable and allowing them willy-nillypeople that they are charged with protecting. so the police department that for over a generation has not been accountable, not been transparent, where we have a police review board that received 10,000 complaints and only resulted with any significant disciplinary action in 19 of those, where we have a police department that has operated its own domestic guantanamo in terms of disappearing citizens and violating their rights. this is the kind of department that needs to receive a clear message and so we were arrested with a group of young seminarians and we need to be clear that the pressure will escalate. there will be more civil disobedience. there will be no protests, more direction actions by the citizens of chicago and the people across the country because the department -- the chicago police department is not unique but it is distinctive in terms of the degree to which it has violated the rights of it is citizens and it cannot be counted. it cannot be allowed to continue to oper

just imposing willy-nilly goals and rules that may not even be able to be achieved while displacing people in the workplace is not my idea how you would handle this issue. i'm a believer in renewables and energy resources, and i think they need to be exploited. secondly, in terms of trump, i signed a pledge turn you have to be careful with pledges you sign. that i would support the republican nominee. look, is it possible you change your mind? yeah. it would take something extreme. look, there is no way donald trump will be president. i don't take it seriously. it is not going to happen. maybe we can all learn a little lesson from all of this. >> in the last 10 years, 300,000 americans have died from gun violence. would you support a ban on assault weapons? would you support closing loopholes and the no fly list. >> we stop people in ohio who are on the terrorism watch list. the one thing we don't want to do with the people on the terrorism watch list, we want to make sure we know what they are doing, and we want to follow them and understand it. when you look at the no fly list, my concer

you won't invade willy-nilly. but you are going to use all the intellect that you have that our experts -- >> but that is the answer that donald trump has given and it's worked very well for him. >> no question about it. but after covering all of these candidates, they all criticize the obama administration. that's what i'm watching most for. we know wolf will push hethem f their own plans. you go to a donald trump rally and you talk to people who love him, they are looking for particulars. so i think this is a different moment. look what has happened in the last month. the paris attacks, san bernardino. so i think this will be a substantive debate and all these candidates will say what they would do, not what the president is doing wrong. >> just so people know what they're hearing behind us, everybody is being told to take their seats. you can keep talking, but we're getting closer to the big moment of the first debate. >> back to what jeffrey said. that's right, as a strategist, i used to call it home base. her

he doesn't do -- he isn't -- he doesn't do anything willy nilly. >> he's strategic. >> he is in this and you can't help but note the timing of this as ted cruz is surging in iowa from all -- no matter how you measure it, all of a sudden he freezes the race in place with this. everything, everybody has stopped in its place in the political world to deal with this. >> steve, steve schmidt, the gop analyst said to politico today, when republican voters look at obama, they see weakness, fecklessness and indecisiveness and trump is in their estimation the antidote to that. >> yeah. no. i mean, there's a contrast here, too, on trump's part. with this proposal, chuck's saying we have the different theories why he chose now. another one you throw out there is he threw it out a day after president obama gave his prime time address on his plan to defeat isis, dealing with terrorism and all sorts of commentary there about was the president strong enough, did he have a clear enough plan and here's donald trump going about as far as possible in the opposite direction as you can go. i think probab

immigrants -- this is really important, really -- i want the american public to understand that i don't willy nilly release people. we have to have a final order of removal and travel documents to the country of origin. not forget, let's the decision that limited our detain to remove and removable aliens. it restricts the amount of time individual can be held in post order custody. six months, typically. then thereafter. whether it's a result of protracted appeals or refusal of a country to accept nationals back, this accounts for somewhere between 30000 and 40,000 convicted criminal alien releases in recent years. that number dropped significantly over time. i mentioned one aspect of our interior for enforcement -- enforcement. we use our priority enforcement program to expand our access to these dangerous criminals. the u.s. government ironically faces daily criticism for not being flexible in its we are not a one-size-fits-all solution but rather an approach that works with state and local governments, something important to me when i was in dallas , thatg with 100 counties we have a good relati

doesn't willy-nilly release people. we have to have a final order of removal from the immigration courts. and appropriate travel documents to the country of origin. in addition, the decision that limited our ability to remove ly and detain removal of aliens. it restricts the amount of time an individual can be held in ort post-order custody. six months typically. and then thereafter unless there is a showing that removability is likely.g whether the result of protected appeals or refusal of a country to accept them back, this decision accounts for somewhere between 30,000 and 40,000 betwe convicted criminal alien releases in recent years. that number has dropped significantly over time and thiy remain a key objective to keep that number going down. i mentioned one aspect of our interior enforcement including the transfer of undocumented immigrants from state and local custody. we use our priority enforcement program or p.e.p. to expand our access to these dangerous criminals. the united states government th faces daily

guest: nobody wants to send our troops willy-nilly. in afghanistan, al qaeda was able to set up an operation and hence, 9/11 happened. and after president obama made the decision to withdraw from iraq and start the schism , in an shiite and sunni vacuum, terrorists have the ability to plan attacks that spill over into the rest of the world. the saudi arabians said that us andisis comes after then europe and then united states. we are seeing impressions of that quote. we cannot allow the vacuum to exist. there is something in between 100,000 troops and doing what the president is doing which is drabbles approach with the special ops forces. we need to stop that. overseasre is fighting but also the question of what to do to protect the homeland. donald trump said that we need to put a ban on muslims coming into united states. do you agree? i didn't see the quote but i will react to how you presented it. perhaps donald trump and others don't acknowledge that it is only a strain and not the totality. i am a doctor, i know a lot of my physi

these refugees that you want to let in willy-nilly, they can hurt americans. they fuel americans' fears. you have to be tougher and put up more restrictions specifically on refugees because there are terrorists in their numbers. >> well, needless to say, i disagree with that assertion. what we want to do as we destroy isis, we do not want to give up the values that have made us the greatest country in the history of the world. which among other things has been a beacon of hope for people in deep distress. obviously, it goes without saying that there must be a very, very strong vetting process. i think we have to do a better job at that. but i do not think that what america is about -- and i speak as somebody whose dad came to this country at the age of 17. i do not think what america is about is turning our backs on people in distress. >> donald trump says we must look twice at those coming across the southern border. there are bad people among them. his numbers go up. he says, we should think about banning all muslims, at least temporarily. his numbers go up.

and we are just letting them willy-nilly into our country like this?sing this kind of testing or vetting process? there has to be a better way. of i am a checks and biographical information is limited and it works for those individuals where we have information and countries have databases that provide that background information. providing information about whether they have suspicions about these folks or if they have been identified as part of these efforts. but for those individuals where , likeve no information syria where there is no by -- no background information -- if you don't have background or identifier then you are right. you have no background to be able to understand what will these people do come into the united states. i would argue that if we are not sure about your background or what's been happening with you in your homeland, as you come here to the united states, especially coming from these countries where we know the complex are going on, where people are being radicalized and they are prosecuting the fight in those areas with t

doesn't willy-nilly release people.e a final order of removal from the immigration courts. and appropriate travel documents to the country of origin. in addition, let's not forget the decision which limited our ability to remove and detain removable aliens. it restricts the amount of time an individual can be held in post-order custody. six months typically. and then thereafter unless there is a showing that removability is likely. whether the result of protected appeals or refusal of a country to accept its nationals back, this decision accounts for somewhere between 30,000 and 40,000 convicted criminal alien releases in recent years. that number has dropped significantly over time and this remains a key objective, to keep that number going down. i mentioned one aspect of our interior enforcement including the transfer of undocumented immigrants from state and local custody. we use our priority enforcement program or p.e.p. to expand our access to these dangerous criminals. you know, the united states government faces

i like the fact this is encouraging legalize asian and dis-incentivizing willie willy-nilly demolitiondoesn't address public policy goal. i do have some concerns and i think we need to work with staff on kind of with the stars passing does become law the package contains. we had an issue on a project that we disapproved as a cu in the north beach area where the project applicant said the tenant family had moved on to affordable housing when they were actually addicted. i don't want to get in-i need to figure out how unit was vacated the month that was one the criteria because it starts getting murky. i would like to amend the motion since staff is artie working on the other section 317 reform, or least examination, investigation, to approach that and continue that work on demolition good i does like to amend the motion to maybe ask staff to also take a look at a lot combinations and what that's all about. >> i'm comfortable if staff can say that the first part of what you ask of the most good i'm ready to sport that the second part i can support because i think it requires other dynami

and the degree to which to just impose willy-nilly goals or rules and is not my idea how to handle this issue. i am a believer in renewable and they need to be exploited i signed a pledge for you have to be careful, i would support the republican nominee. is it possible to change your mind? yes. it takes something extreme but there is no way donald trump will be president. i have said that for weeks and will not take it seriously. it will not happen. >> in the last tenures over 300 americans have been killed by terrorist in the same period over 300,000 americans have died from gun violence. would you support a ban on assault weapons and reduce support a ban on weapons availability on the no-fly list? >> we stop people in ohio on the no-fly list were the terrorism watch list we want to make sure we know what they're doing if you look at the no-fly list my concern is you could be on it. to make sure it they should not fly airplanes and if they have a due process they should not purchase firearms. if you take guns away from all law-abiding people bad guys still have guns. i have to 16 year