society in the future that trying to scare them off so they won't do it somebody like julian as sarge willy nilly will be a progressive think thoughts why he chose to do the job that he chose to do they are killing his son do you see him when he came out of the embassy he's been living he hasn't seen hardly seeing daylight for six years having committed no crime he may very well end up dead that is why the british people he calls them as he was taken by those special branch offices into that van and driven away he called upon the people of great britain to resist i watched on the t.v. they resist them and they should there should be a general strike in england to prevent him being extradited. to moving all night french made weapons may have been used during the saudi led coalition's incursion into yemen that's according to leaks said to be from french intelligence they were made public by investigative website disclose which also saves the weapons may have been used against civilians on for other war crimes to. it demonstrates that hundreds of thousands of civilians live under the threat of these

yemen and britain now sending record levels of weapons to israel somebody like julian assange which willy nilly will be a progressive think thoughts why he chose to do the job that he chose to do that's why he's an activist. that's why we mention him in the same breath as joan pilcher because he cares about other people. he has some of the same qualities that jeremy kolb in as i'm going to ask you what you would say to the british prime minister and would you think about what will happen to julian is a huge here in london and whether indeed as some people say he might be killed but i was say to the british prime minister. i suspect that i mean i could say and i think first i'd say resign but after that obie for that i said before you resigned think carefully about handing julian a so over to the americans except i think that would be a waste of my breath i think i need to speak directly to the british people i cannot use to raise a mag as a conduit to them caray to resumes beyond redemption and beyond help of any kind certainly for me in my view. tory she's a dyed in the wool posts that tory i

of the earth was about 2 billion and it is sneaking up now on eight billion and that growth is willy—nilly for the support that additional number of people require from the resources of the earth. i don't think we ever consider that. let me ask you, if i may, a personal question about the return to earth. perhaps you were, at that time in 1969, the three most famous men on the planet. you had achieved something that men, that mankind have dreamt about for so long and you had to live with it. and yet afterwards it cannot have been easy to handle both the adulation and the intense focus and spotlight upon you. buzz aldrin has been open about the difficulties he had in coming to terms with it. he said i have been to the moon. i had travelled around but what on earth was i going to do next? did you have a feeling like that as well? not really, i bailed out of the space programme before apollo was over. i felt that the first lunar landing had fundamentally done whatjohn f. kennedy had asked us to do. i went on to do otherjobs, next i was assistant secretary of state, later i was director of the

around him mohammad marandi to pick up on a phrase that you use so you were talking about it being willy nilly is that how it's perceived and to run. i think perhaps one way of interpreting the united states is to look at the u.s. administration. or to reverse the phrase the regime. in in a sort of different light trump is i think we should look at him separately from pompei you know and bolton trump i think is his basic objective is reelection and to remain in power and almost everything that he has done over the past few years was to get reelected to get elected and now i think it's a get reelected. bolton on the other hand is a neo con he's an american supremacy s. and he wants to settle old scores with anyone who stood up to the united states so that makes him different from trump and sheldon adelson is perhaps the a key figure behind bolton and from pale but pompei as different from bolton in that he is. a christian zionist he spoke recently about the rapture and. so his his world view is different from that of alton and therefore world views are different from that of trump and that's wh

dysfunctional regimes in places like venezuela and central america that if this million gets in willy-nillye putting pressure on the west this way. rob: we know why democrats seem to be for illegal immigration but republicans have a pickle here because a lot of businesses like all this cheap labor and i have to think some republicans don't necessarily hate the idea of illegal immigration in this country. >> that's true and it is very self-serving. look at the national immigration study by the national academy of science, it shows you immigration both legal and illegal has positive benefit on the size of the pie. it makes gdp bigger. it drives down wages, the winners are businesses and their is a net gain but goes to corporate profits in their mind. >> back to politics. the 2020 democrats screaming out free everything, healthcare, welfare, jobs, guarantee. how do you do that when touting about open border policy. the reason socialism works, those are very small, very condensed, very uniform. here we have 350 million people. how do you do that here? you can't. are drug dealers com across the

plan and all of those things to kind of overlay how that is part of a strategic strategy and not a willy-nilly decision. >> very good. this is an information-only item. you have received an awful lot of information. thank you all. you thought you were giving us information and you're leaving with a whole barrel full of it. thank you, mr. mcguire, for the very important work that you do. >> hear, hear. >> can i make one more comment real quick? >> sure. >> were you going to step in, director, carolina? >> -- director heinicke? >> no. >> if there are watering down of projects, it would be nice to see that done in the light of day. talking about daylighting a lot. bring to this board two options and let us choose which we feel is the stronger option. and then just a couple of additional comments. support the policy recommendation, mr. mcguire, that you bring back to us in may. very happy to see that in the pilot. 9 innovative thinking about the pilot concept. looking forward to seeing that. to the larger kind of challenge, i'm going to keep bringing it back to the bigger picture and the 2024. not

was put in place to limit presidential power so the presidents don't just go off and spend money willy nillythey feel like it. >> we feel very confident. just this week four more states joined us. massachusetts and they have others. some of the money is coming from drug he said forgenc encforceme. the money he's taking with regard to build this wall is money that is used in law enforcement. he is tough on crime, drug abuse, and illicit drugs president. and yet you're right.money. drug interaddiction money and of course, military construction and military spending money that all the states depend on. they depend on people in america safe. so the ironies don't even begin to confound us. >> all right. william tom, thank you very much. >>> coming up, everybody, trump is reportedly already planning a tell-all book to settle scores. that's next. that's next. you might take something for your heart... or joints. but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally discovered in jellyfish, prevagen has been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term memory. prevagen. healthier

there was a lot of concerns about scooters being strewn about, parked willie nilly, on the walk. we heard a lot of complaints about sidewalk riding. scooter riders not following the california vehicle code. that clearly stated this is illegal. so, the pilot began last october. each one, we permitted two companies and each one received 625 scooters as a cap. with the potential to double here at the mid point along with an evaluation. for our evaluation, we looked at usage, safety and accessibility, equity and engagement and complaints e and citations. for usage, scooter availability has varied. one of them took a little longer in the ramp up period and that one faced early issues of vandalism and theft which helped to motivate them further in implementing a lock on their scooters earlier. more recently, both operators are pushing close to their cap. it's good. demand for scooters has been pretty high. we've had almost a quarter million trips through february. most trips are less than 25 minutes. and less than two miles. at this point, most trips are clustered downtown. in a youe u

because there is case law saying congress doesn't have the right to get tax returns willy-nilly for any reason whatsoever. >> okay. ashley, on the soon-to-be released redacted mueller report and its content, white house aides told politico there is nothing criminal that will be released about the president. they said there are no obstruction or collusion claims, and they already know the outcome. is that true, ashley? could anything new come out relative to obstruction? i think it's a pretty safe case to say nobody is talking collusion anymore, but obstruction is a different matter. >> right. and obstruction seems to be the key word here. and that's a matter of interpretation whether or not there is actual evidence of obstruction. what we'd like to see is actually the evidence so we can make our own determination, congress can make their own determination, the american people can make their own determination. because right now we've got the justice department telling us we didn't find evidence of obstruction. but that's their interpretation. and prosecutors are allowed to interpret the

you can't just go in willy-nilly and take anything you want and make it public.very specific, 6103, about this, whether it's the taxes, which is another issue, or whether it's the mueller report. there's a way to do it. those committees are well tuned. jerry nadler knows what he's talking about. he's an attorney himself. he studied this very well, as well as elijah cummings from maryland. these guys know what they're doing. and i'm very proud of the way they have operated. they're not out to get anyone. they're out hopefully to bring the facts out to the public. >> i have heard you call bill barr trump's hand-picked bodyguard. >> yes. >> he has said he will work with the committees to get them more information after this comes out if needed. is the evidence that he has to this point inappropriately been withholding anything back from you guys when it comes to the mueller report? >> well, depends on how much he redacts, but his comment, his summary of what was done, he was not given the ability, kate, to say until the report came out, and he got it, that there was

the president just doesn't willie nilly ask customs or border protection to do something. there's a process by which that takes place but secondly let's think about this for a second. in the rio grande valley alone, 162,000 apprehensions last year border crossings. >> out of control. >> this year alone, 147,000 this year, up to 250,000 and you think about the issues there, we talked about the sanctuary cities. the strain on these local municipalities along the border are tremendous and the problems that occur are tremendous. and democrats and republicans for years have done nothing at all. maybe the president said something out of frustration and maybe he said it off the cuff but we know that's not how things happen in government. there's an executive order and that will be challenge. >> i have two segments about how this conversation falls into a pattern 6 to 10 examples deep of the president doing exactly this. outwardly attacking the rule of law or something people to go around it and say don't worry, i'll take care of you. what makes it wrong? what does the president h

around him mohammad marandi to pick up on a phrase that you use so you were talking about it being willy nilly is that how it's perceived into iran. i think perhaps one way of interpreting the united states is to look at the u.s. administration. or to reverse the phrase the regime. in in a sort of different light trump is i think we should look at him separately from pompei you know and bolton trump i think is his basic objective is reelection and to remain in power and almost everything that he has done over the past few years was to get reelected to get elected and now i think it's a get reelected. bolton on the other hand is a neo con he's an american supremacy s. and he wants to settle old scores with anyone who stood up to the united states so that makes him different from trump and sheldon adelson is perhaps the the key figure behind bolton and from pale but pompei is different from bolton in that he is. a christian zionist he spoke recently about the rapture and. so his his world view is different from that of bolton and their book world views are different from that of trump and that's

because obviously if the president wants to walk down fifth avenue handing out security clearances willy-nillyt's his right to do as the chief executive. he can be as irresponsible with security clearances as he wants to be within his rights, but she's alleging that when these decisions were made to overrule the recommendations from career staff, there was basically no process. it was sort of done capriciously. >> correct. >> why is that so much more of a concern to her than just the clearances being awarded themselves? >> so it's true that the president has the prerogative to award these security clearances, but there is the a process by which the staff vets people. so just as an example, one of the things that they do for everybody is they basically require a credit check of all applicants, which makes total sense. well, believe it or not, they stopped doing credit checks as part of this process. >> wow. >> and why should anybody who fails a credit check have access to top secret materials? so these are the types of questions that are being raised because of the irregularity in the process.

um grants are not doled out willy-nilly. you have to ow that you have a valid fear of persecution based on rpolitical esion. so to the extent that the u.s. has a history of vngiolahuman rights laws, particularly when you look at cases like thi look at chelsea manning, the rt-martialg her cou gave her credit time because she was, nax, tortured. whenou look at that kind of history, you could understand why-- why this would happen. >> nawaz: amy i want to give you the last word here. we have a little over a minute and a halfa left now. are you worried that this sets a dangerous precedent, that it send a message to journalists and otherring the way they interact with sources and walk us through what happens next.r >> these charges again are not-- he's not charged with leaking. he's not charged with the espionage act defenses. he's charged with a computer fraud crime. so it's different from some of the other cases that have been more ctroversial, in my opinion. what happens next is he will have a heari in westminster mag straight

is making a point that probably could resonate with some people that congress shouldn't be able willie nilliee pot and say i want your tacks because i want them? is he right, this sets a dangerous precedent? >> no, he's not right. have you as to wonder how many lawyers, how much time does secretary mnuchin need in order to understand that the word shall means shall? i mean, he's got the treasury department lawyers. he's got the internal revenue service lawyers. he's now got the department of justice and the attorney general. he's got the white house lawyers and trump's personal lawyers, but, obviously, president trump thinks that all these taxpayer funded public lawyers are his personal lawyers, his michael cohen of the moment. and all these lawyers are just in the way. what we have here is a fancy repackageing of what secretary mnuchin provided as real double talk when i questioned him in committee last month. he's using the same steal arguments that the republicans used to cover up my emotions for two years. we now have some oversight. the law is clear, they should move forward, promptly. a

around him mohammad marandi to pick up on a phrase that you use so you were talking about it being willy nilly is that how it's perceived into iran. i think perhaps one way of interpreting the united states is to look at the u.s. administration. or to reverse the phrase the regime. in in a sort of different light trump is i think we should look at them separately from pompei you know and bolton trump i think is his basic objective is reelection and to remain in power and almost everything that he has done over the past few years was to get reelected to get elected and now i think it's a get reelected. bolton on the other hand is a neo con he's an american supremacy s. and he wants to settle old scores with anyone who stood up to the united states so that makes him different from trump and sheldon adelson is perhaps the the key figure behind bolton and from pale but pompei is different from bolton in that he is. a christian zionist he spoke recently about the rapture and. so his his world view is different from that of alton and therefore world views are different from that of trump and that's

was put in place to limit presidential power so that presidents don't just go off and spend money willy-nillynever they feel like it. >> do you think the law solidly supports your motion? >> i do. i know that 19 other attorneys general, there's 20 of us in all, we feel very confident. just this week four more states joined us. massachusetts and three others, and we feel very strongly about our position. >> talk about where this money is coming from with the national emergency. i know some of the money, it is actually coming from drug enforcement. >> right. >> which is interesting considering the fact that trump has said, the president said he's trying to build this border wall to keep drugs out of the country. yet the money he's taking from with regards to the national emergency to build the wall is money that is used in law enforcement. >> he purports to be a tough on crime, strong on national defense, tough on, you know, drug abuse and illicit drugs president. and yet, you're right, he's taking money, treasury forfeiture money, drug interdiction money and, of course, military construction a

people who think we are willy-nilly out there breaking secrets, they should sit in on some beatings. we live in a world now where if we decide in a measured way, you know, really editors like peter and others in our newsroom, that we are not going to publish something, somebody is going to leak it to somebody else. at some point it's just going to get out there. i can remember agonizing decisions about whether to publish details about bob dole, senator dole running for president, his private life. we went on day after day talking about this, was it relevant that the voters needed to know? we decided no. it got leaked to somebody else and we ended up writing a story about the story. so that's part of the dilemma. we make the best judgments we can, but that doesn't mean it's not going to be out there soon and that we will end up writing about it anyway. >> one example was when we published a story about president trump's discussions with the russian foreign minister and russian ambassador in the oval office, and that he had revealed critical intelligence and that it caused consternatio

alix: the saudi's are not going to pop willy-nilly. they were burned. prices. just how conscious or aggressive do you expect the response to be , which then leads tout tight can the market get? to be far are going more reactive rather than proactive. by being proactive last year they ended up creating a market and work on off guard. this time around they are unlikely to do that during they will be far more reactive and see what these sanctions -- not being extended anymore means to the market. are we going to see not exporting to half a million? in order to deliver what the markets need, that would create a month of may where allocations have already been made by saudi's. alix: what is the upside risk? possibility you could see something like $100 oil, especially toward the end of the year. what do you see? likelyubt $100 looks given the fact that u.s. exceptionalism -- it is leverage the u.s. has. now, -- cannot hit the market because of pipe constraints, it is likely the u.s. will lead more on its allies in saudi arabia and the uae. by the second half

start thinking about the way to do it, not just to go out and say i'm just going to start buying willy-nilly equities. where do you target? you work with the regional governments around things like investment and innovation. how do we get targeted investment to the right place to get the euro zone to be a vibrant economy? if they don't, investment is going everywhere else. create a catalyst to change that. alix: are there bonds in europe that offer value, then? rick: there are some things, actually. , somek there's some bonds of the high-yield market. when you swap on a cross currency basis, they actually like buying bunds. you swap them back, you get 3%. that's not bad. some of the high-yield market is ok. i think some of the dividend paying stocks are really attractive. you go around some of the big multinational companies that happen to be located in europe, they pay 5%, 6%, 7% dividend yield for u.s. and vector -- for a u.s. investor to swap back at 8% or 9%. option forl world growth would work. rieder will be sticking with us for the entire next hour. germany'srope's and economy. this i

this isn't something that general barr is just coming up with willy-nilly. the law requires that grand jury material be redacted. the department's policy requires if there is, if there is information ban individual who you don't want to publicize, that person has a right to privacy, you remove it. there are sources and methods involve intelligence agencies. you remove it. they're doing what they are supposed to be doing. >> one of the complaints about the whole mueller investigation, it was started not as a criminal investigation but as an investigation, counterintelligence investigation. that was a very different animal. andrew mccarthy and others talked about that but so did attorney general barr today. let's take a listen, get your reaction. >> in extremely quick fashion you turned a 300 plus page report into a four-page letter supposedly summarized the findings. >> i want to address a serious oversight matter, your unacceptable handling of special counsel robert mueller's report. >> reports have emerged recently, general, that members of the special coun

the willy-nilly disregard for the professional services' decision about who should get security clearancesn what levels wreaks in the same way as, oh, let cell phones into the situation room. >> malware. >> eh, national security, the way it is supposed to be done, the protocols, the professionalism of the security apparatus that has figured out protocols to make sure the national security of the united states is maintained, the president doesn't care, nor does his administration. >> the mueller report, oh, the redactions are so important for national security. oh, yeah, tell me that, after you give anyone a clearance. >> to put it in the context of what we in the news business do for a living, we have these violations of national security, potentially dangerous violations of national security. we have the inhumane cruelty of the white house staff putting materials on shelves for this young woman not to reach them. what are we talking about? joe biden hugging someone. we have lost our perspective. >> well, that's a lot driven by this president, who decenti tdes people and gets them used to