the willingham case is a murder conspiracy case. certainly, the state understands the difference between three and four people being charged with one single conspiracy versus 19 people being charged with three or four different conspiracies. your honor, if the court were to take the state's argument at face value, there would almost never, if ever, be a rico case that can ever be severed. think about what that means. that means that the state of georgia and the various district attorneys throughout the state can use the rico statute to take 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 different conspiracies and at their sole discretion with no oversight, by a board, say they are one bring in one indictment and they are all stuck together. let's compare and contrast that to the ysl case going on a few floors down or up. the ysl case i don't know much about. but i know enough. i watch tv and listen to podcasts. it's a common conspiracy. yes, there were different overt acts being done towards the same conspiracy. and therefore, the state and try them together. but i

the willingham case is a murder case, it's a murder conspiracy case. certainly the state understands the difference between three and four people being charged with one single conspiracy versus 19 people being charged with three or four different conspiracies and your honor, if the court were to take the state's arguments at face value, there would almost never if ever be a rico case that can ever be severed and think about what that means. it means that the state of georgia and the various district attorneys throughout the state can use the rico statute. can take three, four, five, six, seven different conspiracies and at their sole discretion with no oversight by any court say that they won, bring in one indictment, and we're all stuck together, and quite frankly, your honor, let's compare and contrast this to the ysl case going down a few, i don't know if it's floors down or up. i think down. that ysl case, i don't know much about it, but i've watched tv and podcasts, it's a common conspiracy. there were different overt acts toward the same conspira

the willingham case is a murder conspiracy case.ertainly, the state understands the difference between three and four people being charged with one single conspiracy versus 19 people being charged with three or four different conspiracies. your honor, if the court were to take the state's argument at face value, there would almost never, if ever, be a rico case that can ever be severed. think about what that means. that means that the state of georgia and the various district attorneys throughout the state can use the rico statute to take 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 different conspiracies and at their sole discretion with no oversight, by any court, say they are one bring in one indictment and they are all stuck together. quite frankly, your honor, let's compare and contrast that to the ysl case going on a few floors down or up. the ysl case i don't know much about. but i know enough. i watch tv and listen to podcasts. it's a common conspiracy. yes, there were different overt acts being done towards the same conspiracy. and therefore, the state a

the willingham case is a murder case, it's a murder conspiracy case. certainly the state understands the difference between three and four people being charged with one single conspiracy versus 19 people being charged with three or four different conspiracies and, your honor, if the court were to take the state's arguments at face value, there would almost never, if ever, be a rico case that can ever be severed. and think about what that means. it means that the state of georgia and the various district attorneys throughout the state can use the rico statute, can take three, four, five, six, seven different conspiracies and at their sole discretion with no oversight by any court say that they're one, bring them in indictment and then we're all stuck together. and quite frankly, your honor, let's compare and contrast this to the wls case going down a few -- i don't know if it's floors down or up. i think down. that wsl case, i don't know much about it, but i've known enough, it's a common conspiracy. yeah, there were different overt acts being done towa

♪ >> bob menendez remains at the fine and face of mounting calls from members of his own party willingham down from congress. >> not only will i be exonerated, but it will also be new jersey's senior senator. it's beyond terrifying moments on a flight to fort lauderdale for they'll as turbulent sends eight people to the hospital. the new details. emotional return to lahaina, to see what is left of their homes for the first time sice the maui wildfires. >> at least a dozen people returned home today, many discovering scenes like this. >> they are upside down. >> norah: nightmare in wonderland as writers and at an amusement park or stop upside down for nearly 30 minutes. ♪ ♪ >> if you have driven the nation's interstates who have probably seen something like this, a big rig parked along in off-ramp. their big safety questions being raised about where those big rigs should park. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ loving him was read ♪ >> norah: and taylor swift is seeing red, the swift reaction after she attends a kansas city chiefs game. >> if we play like this every time taylor is in the building, then she needs t

willingham versus the state, georgia supreme court case 1995, where there's sufficient evidence of a common scheme or plan to commit a criminal offense, joinder is authorized. and our federal courts kind of take both of these concepts in the united states versus caparali, 1437 an 11 circuit case in atlanta, 1996. an account charging a single rico violation is permissible, even if different defendants are charged with different acts of racketeering, if they're in furtherance of the overarching rico experience charge. in our case, the state's theory of the case and as laid out in the indictment, each and every one of those overt acts charged and all of the offenses charged from counts 1 to 41 were in furtherance of the same overarching rico experience which was to unlawfully affect the outcome of the 2020 election in the state of georgia. every single one. i understand the other side's argument that, you know, my client's over here in coffee county, my client is over here in wisconsin sending off e-mails. the problem for them is it doesn't matter. it's all part of the same overarching

willingham vs. the state. georgia supreme court case 1995. where there's sufficient evidence of a common scheme or plan to commit a criminal offense joinder is authorized. and our federal courts kind of take both of an 11th circuit case here in atlanta, 1986, joinder of co-defendants charging a single violation is permissible, even if different defendants are charged with different acts of racketeering if they're in furtherance of the overarching rico conspiracy charge. in our case, the state's theory of the case and as laid out in the indictment, each and every one of those 161 overt acts charged and all of the offenses ch charged from count one to count 41, were in accordance with the rico conspiracy which was to unlawfully affect the outcome of the election in the state of georgia. i understand the other side's argument that my client is over here in coffee county. my client is over here in wisconsin or wherever sending off emails. but the problem for them is that it doesn't matter because it's all part of the same overarching rico conspir