his name is willy morales. he lost two hands when putting this bomb together in the bronx. >> he was in queens. >> queens, thank you. and he is under protection of the castros and our president has gone there to cuba and everything is kumbayah. the state department says there has been discussions about extraditing them. do you think this could or would get them back to the united states to face our american justice? >> i hope so. something has got to bring them back. they're down there. morales built the bomb that murdered my father. his comments were released by the clintons in 1999 when hillary was running for senator from new york. >> incarcerated faln defendant. >> yes. yes. so look there has to be a focus on fighting a war, not only on islamic terrorists but all terrorists. whether they're puerto rican or muslim. it's not a war against muslims. it's a war against terrorists. terrorism is an idea. an act. terrorists are the people that do it. we need to focus our war against the terrorists no matter where t

tell me about willy morales. and with our new relations with cuba under the obama administration -- >> i was down there at the time. >> they're down there living the life in cuba and our state department says, yes, they're having discussions about potential potentially extraditing them back from cuba to the united states. >> it is crazy. you had "the new york times" bombing in '69 and it's just unbelievable. but it was a different reason in those days. today, it's international. in those days, it was, you know, local terrorism. you know, the black panthers and so forth and everything else. but when you go back to it, you look at it, i mean, it's krauz what was going on in the '70s. and then things got quite for a number of years and now it's international. >> again, i want to bring our viewers up to date. you've been looking at live pictures from wnyw. and on the right is that dumpster that they believe had something in it or exploded. authorities not saying it was an ied. not saying it was even nip of bomb or an

willy for nothing. what he's trying to do here is to take the focus off all of the e-mails and clinton foundations and say this is a moral it's not even close. this isn't even apples to oranges. >> let's be clear here, donald trump specifically said he gives money to get the outcomes that he wants. this -- there was a clear -- it seemed as though this investigation was taking off and all of a sudden it stopped. mind you, there must have been enough there to initiate this because even here in new york state the attorney general is prosecuting and investigating -- i might add -- >> is he investigating the clinton foundation? >> it wouldn't have been political if the attorney general in florida had gone ahead with her prosecution of trump university, but she did not, why? i don't know. maybe the charity actually gave her some money and taken it back and all of a sudden there's $100,000 fund-raiser for this individual? >>. >> he decided not to prosecute. that timing could be significant. >> he tuesday from his own mouth. he pays for his outcomes. >> today the campaign manager kellyanne conway calls it a coincidence. here's h

willie horton would be used in the campaign. all of this is in the book. so i understand the argument about the direct line, my sense is if you are looking for philosophical or moral consistency, looking at the american presidency are those who seek it is probably not the first place to look. so you need to look at moments on the totality of the lives where they managed to transcend those shortcomings, that is my view. >> yes sir,. >> you're probably answered the question indirectly, i recently saw the play and statin, bloodied buddy andrew jackson, parody of jackson and i think of our current campaign about on bridled populism and manipulation of that populism. you see any parallels to that? >> with jackson and trump, i have resisted this for a couple of reasons, one is that jackson brought an enormous amount of experience, you can argue whether it was good experience or not but to the presidency had been a judge, senator, general, and so the idea that, fundamentally the choices being presented to us in the next 45 days or so is one between one of the most conventionally prepared candidates in american history and the least conventionally prepared. i interviewed