the third party cannot extract data, consumer data, willy—nilly. third party cannot extract data, consumer data, willy-nilly. and they can't sell it on to anybody, it is com pletely can't sell it on to anybody, it is completely protected. it is only for the content you allow, only for the purpose you allow. and at any point you can say to that third party that they must delete that data and they are required to by law. what about banks? is it going to be the death kneu banks? is it going to be the death knell for traditional banking? the huge amount of money that they make? it is interesting because at pwc we rana it is interesting because at pwc we ran a survey a it is interesting because at pwc we ran a survey a few years ago to ask them how they thought about open banking, an 80% of the banks felt it was a threat. we reran that survey last year, and interestingly 70% of the banks we surveyed were actually preparing themselves to be participants in open banking. so that means not just participants in open banking. so that means notjust providers

government to let anything come out of it's you know come out of its grasp the federal reserve prints willy nilly trillions and trillions of dollars since we went off the gold standard backed by nothing now that this is a ponzi scheme the government that's what my book is about the government debt globally is a ponzi scheme the governments can never repay this debt and we're about to hit a wall so should people invest in alternative asset classes absolutely is a leonardo da vinci painting we're painting worth half a billion dollars is an apartment in midtown midtown manhattan worth six hundred million dollars i would argue no it's not and i would agree we should prices from when i went to university have gone up to. thousand percent yeah where real wages since the one nine hundred eighty s. are flat so how does that work out when i got out of school i could've bought a better mission they let me let me jump in here in fifty thousand gentlemen no i have to go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on bitcoin staying with our. los angeles the city of luxury and fame but

i've got it tell you, before you open the american wallet and spend willy nilly, lets not plan for the winter that's the worst in 40 years, you've got to plan for something more normal. i'm trying to put some brakes on this conversation and not open this up to the biggest spending nn 100 years. liz: i love you, but gary, isn't that like waiting until you're thirsty to start digging a well. that would mean jobs, and infrastructure which leads to the whole infrastructure discussion. >> many smart people think we're 20 years behind on the power grid. we have been promised for a long time wii by politicians, not just on that, on the airports, the roads, the bridges, on the schools. i read a heartbreaking story, in classes, didn't have heaters in some classes. >> gary. >> let me-- it's about time that something gets done. politicians need to get onto these essential things for the future growth of in country today. >> but, gary, let's not get crazy here. at the end of the day, we have to watch our pennies and cents and can't turn it into one of these big spending programs, ala the democrats

we shouldn't allow willy-nilly anybody to look at all this information. >> bill: the reason i asked about the president. the tweet earlier today on fisa where it came out at 7:00 this morning. house votes on controversial fisa act today. the act that may have been used with the help of the discredited phony dossier to abuse the trump campaign by the previous administration and others he asks with a question mark. that tweet came out 12 hours after this statement came from the white house late last night. administration urges the house to reject this amendment and preserve the useful role fisa section 702 authority plays in protecting american lives. that in itself seems like it is a contradiction. can you clear it up? >> i think you can be for reauthorization and reauthorization with reform. the president speaks for himself but i believe the president supports reform and does not believe we should allow anybody to look through this database without a warrant. we've seen how much bias there is. we've seen top ranking people in the f.b.i. and justice department whose political bias has gott

that people have built lives around this, and because of that, the government just can't decide willy-nilly to take these things away. and so those same types of arguments can be made in the tps setting as well. >> 30 seconds, laura. >> one thing to point out with tps, we should also take into account our government's involvement in these other countries. the united states has a long history in foreign policy involvement in el salvador and haiti and honduras. we should take into account. i think the current comments in the news suggest these governments are the at the place they are because of themselves. in reality, it's because of united states intervention. >> we will have to leave it there. laura sanchez, robert nunez, professor, thank you all. >>> just about a year ago, the city of oakland got a new police chief, anne kirkpatrick took the helm of a department that was it turmoil. there were ongoing investigations into widespread sexual misconduct by officers. the city was under federal court oversight in the wake of the ryders case. that case involved officers falsifying police reports

government to let anything come out of it's you know come out of its grasp the federal reserve prints willy nilly trillions and trillions of dollars since we went off the gold standard backed by nothing now that this is a ponzi scheme the government that's what my book is about the government debt.

. >> i have to say, it would seem that one thing we are dispensing with willy-nilly oswego is biology. the biological reality of other species. one of the things, seems a couple of thresholds that we have passed. without really fully grasping what we have done. one is that the aggregate number of human beings on this earth has become a bio geophysical force.discernible in the fossil record. the american society for geophysicists or the american -- never get it right but they want to know call it the -- to reflect this profound impact of humans on life on earth.one of the things that we are doing, we are reducing biodiversity of other species. the way that some scientists but is that we are using up too much photosynthesis. actually depriving other species of photosynthesis. that we are taking with her habitat because we are putting so many more human bodies on the earth that we are converting their habitat to human buildings for people to live in and agriculture to feed people. but we are doing something very scary to me. very dangerous and kind of tragic. which is reducing diversity

only event and that means that the organizers have the power to exclude nations or individuals willy nilly they can do it as they please there is some kind of attempt to ostracize russia russia is the bad guy of sport at the moment has been for the past twelve eighteen months we know that it isn't getting a fair shake that we haven't seen evidence to support these allegations that there is state sponsored doping but the world or most of the world at least seems to have accepted that there is some kind of systematic doping going on in russia because of that reason i think that anyone who is associated with russia is automatically lumped together with a nation that is collectively guilty of doping which is not to say have course that the rest of the world isn't taking dope. to enhance their performances in sport because i think every other country is participating in some kind of doping but the point is that russia has been stuck with that label and that stigma is going to be awfully difficult to erase in the years to come the closer it gets to the the start date with a couple of weeks away

only event and that means that the organizers have the power to exclude nations or individuals willy nilly they can do it as they please there is some kind of attempt to ostracize russia russia is the bad guy of sport at the moment has been for the past twelve eighteen months we know that it isn't getting a fair shake we haven't seen evidence to support these allegations that there is state sponsored doping but the world or most of the world at least seems to have accepted that there is some kind of systematic doping going on in russia because of that reason i think that anyone who is associated with russia is automatically lumped together with a nation that is collectively guilty of doping which is not to say of course that the rest of the world isn't taking dope. to enhance their performances in sport because i think every other country is participating in some kind of doping but the point is that russia has been stuck with that label and that stigma is going to be awfully difficult to erase in the years to come closer it gets to the the start day with a couple of weeks away now of cours

only event and that means that the organizers have the power to exclude nations or individuals willy nilly they can do it as they please and my understanding is that they are not under any kind of obligation to disclose the reasons we do want to know the reasons of course because there seems to be very little rhyme nor reason behind these decisions the only thing we can do at the moment is jump to the conclusion that there is persecution going on i know it's a tough word but i do believe it's appropriate in this instance these athletes are being excluded because they are if not guilty by association smeared by association the presumption is that as their russians they're both familiar with the russian coaching methods they will have rubbed shoulders with trainers they will have come into contact in some way with people who have in the past or maybe even the present views dope and that makes them guilty. of some strong language there alice by association persecution however if we look at some of the facts many of the athletes they didn't even participate in the such twenty fourteen games or

only event and that means that the organizers have the power to exclude nations or individuals willy nilly they can do it as they please there is some kind of attempt to ostracize russia russia is the bad guy of sport at the moment has been for the past twelve eighteen months we know that it isn't getting a fair shake and we haven't seen evidence to support these allegations that there is state sponsored doping but the world or most of the world at least seems to have accepted that there is some kind of systematic doping going on in russia because of that reason i think that anyone who is associated with russia is automatically lumped together with a nation that is collectively guilty of doping which is not to say of course that the rest of the world isn't taking dope. to enhance their performances in sport because i think every other country is participating in some kind of doping but the point is that russia has been stuck with that label and that stigma is going to be awfully difficult to erase in the years to come the closer it gets to the the start date a couple of weeks away now of c

government to let anything come out of it's you know come out of its grasp the federal reserve prints willy nilly trillions and trillions of dollars since we went off the gold standard backed by nothing now that this is a ponzi scheme the government that's what my book is about the government debt globally is a ponzi scheme the governments can never repay this debt and we're about to hit a wall so should people invest in alternative asset classes absolutely is a leonardo da vinci painting we're painting worth half a billion dollars is an apartment in midtown midtown manhattan worth six hundred million dollars i would argue no it's not and i would agree we should prices from when i went to university have gone up to. thousand percent where real wages since the one nine hundred eighty s. are flat so how does that work out when i go to school i could've bought a better let me let me let me jump in here fifty thousand gentlemen no i have to go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on staying with our . goal this periodic album number seventy nine is unique attributes tha

government to let anything come out of it's you know come out of its grasp the federal reserve prints willy nilly trillions and trillions of dollars since we went off the gold standard backed by nothing now that this is a ponzi scheme the government that's what my book is about the government debt globally is a ponzi scheme the governments can never repay this debt and we're about to hit a wall so should people invest in alternative asset classes absolutely is a leonardo da vinci painting we're painting worth half a billion dollars is an apartment in midtown midtown manhattan worth six hundred million dollars i would argue no it's not and i would agree we should prices from when i went to university have gone up two thousand percent yet where real wages since the one nine hundred eighty s. are flat so how does that work out when i got out of school i could have bought a new better match and they let me let me jump in here in fifty thousand gentlemen no i have to go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on bitcoin staying with our key. hello my name's peter and i've b

only event and that means that the organizers have the power to exclude nations or individuals willy nilly they can do it as they please there is some kind of attempt to ostracize russia russia is the bad guy of sport at the moment has been for the past twelve eighteen months we know that it isn't getting a fair shake we haven't seen evidence to support these allegations that there is state sponsored doping but the world or most of the world at least seems to have accepted that there is some kind of systematic doping going on in russia because of that reason i think that anyone who is associated with russia is automatically lumped together with a nation that is collectively guilty of doping which is not to say of course that the rest of the world isn't taking dope. to enhance their performances in sport because i think every other country is participating in some kind of doping but the point is that russia has been stuck with that label and that stigma is going to be awfully difficult to erase in the years to come the closer it gets to the the start date with a couple of weeks away now of

invitation only event and that means that the organizers have the power to asians or individuals willy nilly they can do it as they please there is some kind of attempt to ostracize russia russia is the bad guy of sport at the moment has been for the past twelve eighteen months we know that it isn't getting a fair shake that we haven't seen evidence to support these allegations that there is state sponsored doping but the world or most of the world at least seems to have accepted that there is some kind of systematic doping going on in russia because of that reason i think that anyone who is associated with russia is automatically lumped together with a nation that is collectively guilty of doping which is not the sort of course that the rest of the world isn't taking dobe. to enhance their performances in sport because i think every other country is participating in some kind of doping but the point is that russia has been stuck with that label and that stigma is going to be awfully difficult to erase in the years to come the closer it gets to the the start date with a couple of weeks away

only event and that means that the organizers have the power to exclude nations or individuals willy nilly they can do it as they please there is some kind of attempt to ostracize russia russia is the bad guy of sport at the moment has been for the past twelve eighteen months we know that it isn't getting a fair shake and we haven't seen evidence to support these allegations that there is state sponsored doping but the world or most of the world at least seems to have accepted that there is some kind of systematic doping going on in russia because of that reason i think that anyone who is associated with russia is automatically lumped together with a nation that is collectively guilty of doping which is not to say of course that the rest of the world isn't taking dope. to enhance their performances in sport because i think every other country is participating in some kind of doping but the point is that russia has been stuck with that label and that stigma is going to be awfully difficult to erase in the years to come the closer it gets to the the start date with a couple weeks away now of

only event and that means that the organizers have the power to exclude nations or individuals willy nilly they can do it as they please there is some kind of attempt to ostracize russia russia is the bad guy of sport at the moment has been for the past twelve or eighteen months we know that it isn't getting a fair shake and we haven't seen evidence to support these allegations that there is state sponsored doping but the world or most of the world at least seems to have accepted that there is some kind of systematic doping going on in russia because of that reason i think that anyone who is associated with russia is automatically lumped together with a nation that is collectively guilty of doping which is not to say of course that the rest of the world isn't taking dope. to enhance their performances in sport because i think every other country is participating in some kind of doping but the point is that russia has been stuck with that label and that stigma is going to be awfully difficult to erase in the years to come the closer it gets to the the start date with a couple weeks away now

government to let anything come out of it's you know come out of its grasp the federal reserve prints willy nilly trillions and trillions of dollars since we went off the gold standard backed by nothing now that this is a ponzi scheme the government that's what my book is about the government debt globally is a ponzi scheme the governments can never repay this debt and we're about to hit a wall so should people invest in alternative asset classes absolutely is a leonardo da vinci painting we're painting worth half a billion dollars is an apartment in midtown midtown manhattan worth six hundred million dollars i would argue no it's not and i would agree we should prices from when i went to university have gone up to. thousand percent yeah where real wages since the one nine hundred eighty s. are flat so how does that work out when i got out of school i could've bought a better match and they let me let me jump in here and fifty thousand gentlemen oh i have to go to a break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on bitcoin staying with our. max kaiser financial survival guide liqu

directly debunked the notion that fare cutting has come back and said they'll hold the line on willy nilly fleet expansion which historically caused it hence why flying is miserable. every flight is extremely full notice that? pay through the nose for amenities and even first class feels like steerage on old ocean liner. key metric that delta reported with all the full flights you have, company spews cash given profitable growth, stock is way too cheap trading miniscule nine times last year's earnings all can go higher. this is about price discipline and industry seems to have it under control. bad for you as passenger, great for you as shareholder pin action from the amazing delta quarter was so strong, stocks of united, continental and american also rallied. only imagine how many price target bumps this group is going to get starting tomorrow what is the one thing that most airlines don't have under control though price of oil which is a huge variable, often stung these companies. been hobbled by fuel costs so much, in hedge fund handbook, or the theoretical one, it says short the airlin

people are buying stocks willy nilly. at the end of the day even a small return is a good return. you can't buy bonds. they don't return anything. instead you go into the stock market. by comparison it's a good investment. >> if that changes maybe that changes where the stock market is trading at. >> dana: there will be a down turn at some point. >> yes. >> dana: is america better positioned now to handle it based on lessons learned of 2008. >> i don't see 2008 as a exact mirror. the banks were inter relatepugh with mortgage debt. i don't see that happening now. if you thought stocks were going up forever you are just -- that doesn't happen. you have to be prepared forry venfor it.announcer: take a goot your 401k today. >> dana: thank you. mcscreen, the french president is set to visit the white house april 24th. the president and first lady were macron's guest in july. >> dana: one state pugh mv reported illega illegal immigrae now pushing to put an end to it. and running out of storage space, the issue stumping google researchers. not for long. the answer lies in their text. >>

broad categories, when we implement them to have some control so the decisions are not made like willy nilly. >> just to step back up to 10,000 feet for a moment, i really believe the presence of the committee has made a big difference on the issue in the time i have been looking at it, parks bond is a good example. we had a lot more openness in prior parks bonds and fair amount of unhappiness on the part of some citizens and community organizations that felt there were facilities promised and not delivered. the next couple of park bonds learned the lesson and there was a more specific listing of what was going to be included. this is one of the things that i think the board oversight has made a big difference over the years. >> i agree. i was the liaison for rec park and there was a lot of specificity and so their feet were held to if fire. some of the subsequent bond authorizations by the voters are at a fairly high level. when we issue the bonds, go back to the board for a supplemental aappropriatation, that's when you get the legal rierequiremen of what you can and can't spend. >> i woul

something that could be the market rate it's above , that so we know you're not just borrowing willy-nilly. you are not borrowing just to borrow. i think he would've used his rule. the fed should have used his rule. we would have been much better off. we would not be in a long-term economic funk afterwards. we haven't been in a recession since then, but the road economy -- but the economy has not been growing robustly. we created a massive hazard problem. you can make any law you want saying there will be no more will out. there will be another bailout. why not take a little more risk? not to mention the risk that is inherent in the fed's balance sheet. janet yellen was just on tv this afternoon. she said that is going to shrink its balance sheet and they and talking about that for five years. how they're going to do it is still unclear. there is quite a bit of risk there. it's not at all clear that what we did in 2008 was optimal and it doesn't seem to be hamiltonian. >> i have a question about the bank of the united states. what percentage of it was private and what percent was public? i

these are innocent people who have been accused of very serious crimes and it's done in such a willy-nilly manner, the politics of it are the only thing that matter. these are people's lives that were talking about here. >> shannon: glenn simpson who was a former "wall street journal" journalist and cofounder of fusion gps, he has complained that he thinks that there have been leaks and mischaracterizations of his position, he wrote a piece on it last week. he said chuck grassley said we want you to come and testify, you took the fifth amendment. the top democrat on the committee released all of this -- the full transcript. she said the innuendo and misinformation circulating about the transcript are part of a deeply troubling effort to undermine the investigation into potential pollution and obstruction of justice. the only way to set the record straight is to make the transcript public. grassley says they didn't consult on that, he would've consulted with her. >> i can't imagine what she hopes to accomplish and the accusation is just silly. a year ago there were so many democrats who exp

just telling willy nilly this person looks like they're there person or that person, that type of personhem. that's not a good idea. neil: here is where i'm confused, sir, help me with this. whatever your political views, i ask the republicans the same question, the former ice director, the guys running ice right now, if you have high suspicion, let's say in colorado, let's say in denver, that there is a potential murderer that city officials are hiding in their midst and federal officials share that with you and want to find him or her, can they? would you as governor of colorado have a problem with them coming in to find that person? >> well, what-- depends what you mean by coming in to find that person and again, we have rights in this country. neil: authorities sharing that information, we think it's this guy? >> okay, i have no problem with that. neil: okay. >> i think if you were to talk to mayor hancock he'd say the same thing. we definitely want to get violent criminals arrested, tried, and if they're guilty, deported in those cases where it's appropriate. neil: let's say they do

. >> the reason they use the shutdown willy nilly, i think recklessly and irresponsibly as a political tactic because they hope when the government shutdowns happen there will be somebody clear to blame and it will be happening for a clear reason. they think they'll make a hero and goat out of this. in this place they're shutting down the government, where they hold all branchs of government for something they can't explain. >> and they'll make history doing that. we never had the one party control model on a government shut down. thank you, rachel. >>> the united states government is on the verge of a shutdown tonight because the president of the united states did not get what he wanted from mexico. the president has said that if there is a shutdown he will, of course, blame it on the the democrats for not giving the president what he wanted, but the truth is the president would be shutting down the government because he sur rend erd the power to shut down the government to the mexican government. the deal the president wanted to avoid a shutdown would include $20 billion to pay for t

he's been too willy-nilly on this. he's been too unpredictable. we need some predictability. >> so underlying trust is a big problem. the president doesn't seem to, i guess, live up to his promises as it pertains to particularly this issue. and if you don't have that, then how are you going to be able to be that great negotiator if nobody believes your word? >> i respect him for trying to take the blame off senator schumer and placing it on the president. but it is senator schumer. we're talking about daca, we're talking about immigration, and schumer will not accept anything less. people are talking solutions in good faith. the difference between this shutdown and other shutdowns is because republicans and democrats on the face of it all agree we should find a solution to daca. what happened now, sureer demonstrated he can shut this down. the democrats don't really care about average voters and they're sort of out of touch. >> so brian, how involved should the president be today in this process? what do you believe the president could actively be

the federal government has to sign off, they can't go willy-nilly.trator of the federal center for medicaid and medicare said this, "believing that community engagement requirements do not promote the requirements of medicaid is a tragic example of the soft bigotry espoused by the prior administration. those days are over." that is just not well received on the left. >> it's not. here's the thing, president trump campaigned on undoing large amounts of obamacare and that is exactly what he is doing as he's governing. it's interesting to watch and see how this year will continue to play up because as you get closer to the midterms, you will see the president come under a lot of pressure from those on the right to hold him to account and say, did you follow through on the campaign promises? is trying to do that right now. >> by the way, i am so confused, i try to remember the rhetoric from the left, when medicaid was expanded, we were told these were good, hardworking american people, they all had jobs but they don't get health benefits because of the c

mitch mcconnell for whatever i might think about his politics is not going to change the rules willy-nilly on something else. secondarily, right now it doesn't matter. there were not enough votes to get ts done with just republican support on friday night and friday morning, saturday morning whenever the original vote happened here. if the republicans change the rules, you might see some of the democrats that crossed over go back to the democratic side just to opposite that. mitch mcconnell said today it's not going to happen. i think that's highly unlikely, but that's the president jumping into legislative matters that republicans don't find especially helpful. >> gathi want to go to kelly o'donnell. kelly, working the phones a little bit, the white house press shop sending out photos of the president working yesterday. what has he been up to today? >> we believe there are additional series of phone calls where the president is checking in. it's been described as wanting to know more about the effects of the shutdown, whether that's with military or federal workers, those of any kind thin

you mean to tell me that a fisa judge is going to jeopardize their judicial integrity and just willy-nillyd out warrants without having the requisite documents and proof available. what -- what congressman nunes is doing is not just dangerous, it is stupid. because when it gets exposed, when it gets exposed, this is going to blow up in a way that is not going to be helpful to the congress. >> and the scandal he claimed that was there and it turned out to be him. >> he's just jumped back on the stove. and to me it is just a sign of everybody who comes welcome back the orbit of president trump just ends up being diminished by it. >> they lose their bearings. they lose their common sense bearings. >> there are two things happening at the same time. one is what is in the memo and what are we doing about that. and there is cerbat the -- concern at the double -- they are resigned -- because it involved classical threat -- and to your point, why is nunes doing this? and whether or not he was doing so under some sort of particular order or orchestration with the white house. he's doing it in suppo

have the president of the united states, the chief law enforcement officer of the united states, willy nilly trying to impugn the reputations of career law enforcement officials who regard themselves as straight arrow civil servants who are part of institutions we have valued for a long time in the country for upholding the rule of law. at the mueller investigation, at every turn be r, you had the president trying to undermine the reputation of everybody who's touched the investigation, solely because i think he's worried and aware of the gravitas of the situation he's in and he will pull out all the stops to impugn the credibility of everybody in it. >> let's listen to the president's answer to did he ask andrew mccabe who he voted for. >> did you ask mccabe who he voted for? did you ask him that? >> i don't think so, no. >> did you not. >> i don't know what's the big deal with that. i would ask you, who did you vote for? i don't think it's a big deal, but i don't remember that -- i saw that this morning, but i don't remember asking him that question. >> is it possible you did? is it a poss

they wouldn't attack anyone willy-nilly without being a plant and part of a strategy. he is the only president that would call for someone to be jailed. that's very, very different than his predecessors would do. his supporters like that, but a lot of traditionalists in washington find it disturbing. they see traces of authoritarianism or other unnutritional methods that they consider to be out of bounds. >> and garrett, the year ended with this love fest on the south grounds of the white house, with the speaker of the house praising the president's exquisite leadership on the tax package being passed. so it was a big victory for them. is that the tone we're going to see from the republican leadership on the hill going forward, or are they going to start worrying about their midterm challenges and the fact that democrats have been doing rather well in these closing weeks and months? >> reporter: i think that will be the tone to start, andrea. republicans on the hill left a bunch of items over from their 2017 to-do list that they have got to get done in the early part o

we don't just want willy-nilly the president looking at all different information because some of thermation may be bad, and we need the president to be looking at good decisions based on good and strong and accurate information. >> that's john kelly to a t. and it is important because the president has to deal with a number of crises, a number of problems. he has a national security processes that involves both deputies meetings and principle meetings in order to move forward on recommendations to the president. he ought to follow that. he ought to do the same thing when it comes to economic policy and to domestic policy is to create an orderly processes where information is provided, options are viewed, and then they are then presented to the president. when i was chief of staff to bill clinton before any briefing went to the president, it had to come to me in the chief of staff's office at the white house. i think that's the right way to do business. >> the north korea situation has become incredibly dangerous in the last few months. what's your take on this latest provocation wher