what has changed is politicians see this as rehabilitative theme, his comment was it is just windowdressing, on the same problem. when i say faith-based, a lot of them are mostly conservative christian groups because churches i set up for this kind of work, they are big mega churches with separate ministries and are often the only church is located near prisons which are often in really rural remote areas so it is not as if you have a glut of unitarians or quakers or wiccans who are practicing in that area. you have southern baptists, conservative nondenominational evangelical christians. i went to the prisons, went to interview people, sat in on classes, visiting different groups that met over a year ago, went to florida and angola prison in louisiana, i went to texas, california, ohio and ideally, it is to spend time with people and understand the world they live in but in prison that is difficult because you are not in prison, limit access, prison by prison, some prisons, move around and talk to people, the prisons have a reminder with me at all times, i could speak to somebody in a room

for us to be able to tell whether it will be a real change or whether it will be tinkering and windowdressing. we didn't have enough information yet on that. tabled full chapters on telecom, services, digital trade, technical barriers to trade, and sanitary services. each one of those actually anything in particular that we would consider an improvement. there was nothing to make sure that the public interest will be protected from challenge. and no efforts to reinstate the country of origin labeling for prioritych was a high for us. there was a positive note. the chapters on state owned enterprises and enforcement were good, even though they didn't contain everything we would like. they were much improved. the chapters on critical issues like labor, investment and currency have not been added yet. they haven't been laid down at all yet. that, giving the overall grade, an incomplete because we don't know enough to say whether it will be a real change or more of the same. we have to wait. the second round takes place starting this thursday in mexico city. administrative and minor tech stuff. t

for us to be able to tell whether it's going to be a real change or whether it's tinkering and windowdressing. we did not have enough information yet on that. the pool chapters on telecom, services, digital trade, technical barriers to trade and sanitary and sanitary services and each one of those actually did not have anything in particular that we would consider an improvement. there was nothing to make sure that the public interest would be protected from challenge. theno efforts to reinstate country of origin labeling m foreat which was a high priority -- for me to which was a high priority for us. which was a high priority for us. they did not contain everything we would like. they were much improved. the chapters on critical issues like labor, investment, and currency have not been added yet. they have not been laid down at all yet. that you can give the overall grade and incomplete because we just don't know enough yet to be able to say whether it's going to be a real change or more of the same. we have to wait. the second round takes place i think starting this thursday. in mexico cit

loss of senator corker is more damaging to the president during a the jobs council was in a way windowdressing they did not play a former role. senator corker has your ship on in --ay of issues are issues. scarlet: whether it's through my mike pencengress, -- or congress, though he be working with the president western mark -- president? john: in order to get through this president, you have to find whatever channel is possible. alienated thate direct relationship with the president himself, it creates a challenging situation. it's a maze and it's like working with the child in order to get through to the leader of the free world. francine: who boards the president at the moment? he has been under attack by many sides and john: even if you have white house aide behind in registering their displeasure with the president supporting nazis, they still remain on his staff. he see a lot of staffers were still there. problem is losing the support in congress. you have some important leaders like senator graham and others standing up and suggesting there really is a problem in the oval office, and it