lou: you are certainly one of the wiseman for the republican party. at this point, do you feel that you are being listened to by those that need to listen to the wiseman in putting forward ideas, whether it be illegal immigration, gun control, saying that this has to be a united approach? >> i think so. there were a number of different viewpoints. you're never going to be the predominant predominant viewpoint. i think that the party is making the right steps. i think speaker boehner has a pretty firm grasp on what is going on. i think that some of the movement to opening up the party more than we have in the past is a greater thing to do. >> i believe that we have to figure out a way around the social issues because i think that those are the ones that are the very difficult ones. we have to figure out what is relevant to women. we cannot expect to be the majority party if we are not relevant with women. the idea that jeb bush has moved this way on immigration, suddenly he doesn't believe that any resolution of our illegal immigration crisis is workin

our other guest is roslyn wiseman. those of you who are parents have probably read her books. queen bee, queen bee wannabes, she has something else coming out that i'm probably not allowed it talk about yet, something to do with boys coming up. but i want to get started because our time is short. lee, first of all, tell us about bully, please, what was your inspiration for that. >> sure, we kind of met before, we definitely wanted to make our session a little more relaxed and so what we'll try and throw it out to questions pretty soon and have a bit of a free style banter amongst ourselves. but bully basically began as a, like most independent film makers, a dream, how can i possibly make this film, be able to capture bullying and give it a home, if you will, in something as durable and impactful as a documentary or a film. it very much grew from my own experiences of having been bullied as a kid and feeling like or taking the memory of how hard it was to communicate what was happening, to find agreement or adults or even to get my parents to advocate on my behalf and feeling

he's such a great wiseman and mentor. i've learned so much from you. ~ and i know that you're going to continue to work with many of our communities to make them safer and to come up with strategies, how residents work with law enforcement cooperatively to keep our neighborhoods safe. i wanted to also say for the richmond district, it's been an honor to work with you as well. you helped us reach so many of the chinese community through our lunar new year richmond district walks. targeting chinese seniors by unscrupulous criminals, but also just in many ways coming up with great creative ideas. i know your work for 15 years with sf safe is really important, but your work with the fierce royal hong kong police force and many other years of work in other communities make you a tremendous and valuable servant to the people of san francisco. so, on 'retirement from sf safe, i just wanted to thank you on behalf of the richmond district. thank you so much, mr. chan. >> thank you, supervisor mar. supervisor avalos. >> i can't hel

. >> the point that makes that comment so interesting was cheney was supposed to be the wiseman who ishe inexperienced bush, who had no world experience, do what needed to be done as president. he had been in a realist administration under bush's father, the first bush president. and, therefore, people thought oh, we can have some confidence in this. of course, the opposite was the case. the arrogance of cheney that is shown in that film clip and that we now see exposed is the same arrogance that told him we don't need to go to the united nations. we can defie the united nations on iraq, syria. that is really bad state craft. i its's terrible. it has cost us untold amounts of treasure, blood and a big part of our future. >> do you think, cynthia, that when people see this documentary, it will only remind them of how insensitive and in denial the bush administration was, and, in particular, vice president cheney? >> absolutely. ten yearings out, there have been a number of conservatives to the war who have come out and said they were wrong about this. some other conservatives don't want

if you had adolf wiseman in world war ii and his son-in-law was the spokesman for the nazi regime andhe was captured on the battlefield or in flight which is what happened here, would we then want him tried in the u.s. district court for the eastern district of new york? of course not. that's ridiculous, we want him given the right to remain silent? absolutely not. the world that somehow we're showing the world we're better than anybody else by trying a 9/11 conspirator in the united states puts new york at risk and i frankly, it puts our entire system at risk because that's why you have military tribunals, that's why you have military commissions and this is this dual conflict that the administration cons statly-- i wrote about it in an op-ed. >> you can use drones against american citizens overseas and, knock down an american with a drone, but we capture an al-qaeda operative, the spokesperson for al-qaeda we're going to try him in the eastern district court in new york. >> sean: and the president, joe biden, they were bragging throughout the election campaign, they got bin laden, b

. >> at an american bar association luncheon, andrew wiseman talks about how new technologies have changedthe way law enforcement operates and investigates crimes. this is 45 minutes. >> thank you. i had narrowed down the stories about, down to one but after the introduction think i might need to say a number of anecdotes about valerie. but i will start with one because it's relevant to assuming the of general counsel after valerie caponi has had a position for ages but although she is small in stature, she has very large shoes to fill. and the best or i could come up that would give you a sense of those shoes is when valerie was the chief of the criminal division and i was a mere pop, although we did overlap i was much younger. [laughter] i had the pleasure of defending valerie when she was a witness before chief judge weinstein. and at some point after some prodding, there was a defense question that was sort of rambling speculative and hypothetical, and valerie was staring at me fiercely. i said, objections to it and the judge said what's the objection? you know, how could the witness k