you posted $25 billion merger withth comcast. no you look at, and you have said it was brilliant. people thought it was sky and a bad idea. they thought it might undermine their efforts. people said we thought carly was wrong, but carly was right. they got you a job. >> the merger was difficult. and it was risky. at a time that we proposed the merger, we needed every alternative. hewlett-packard was a company that needed to lead once again. that the be aware industry around us was consolidated. we could use that consolidation or we could fall behind and be consolidate head. i think the point is this. anytime time a leader takes on something to change the order of things, they undergo criticism. in the technology industry in particular, if you are leading, by the time you do something that is obvious to everyone, it is probably way too late. tois probably obvious everyone what microsoft needs to do. it is obvious what blackberry needs to do. by the time it is obvious, it is too late. when we took it on, it was timely, but it was going to get criticized. there was one big battle tha