i will listen to his ideas, but the strategy we have -- we have got to give it time to wk. >> i am surprised at the reaction. are we not all in this together? apart from a small sect in favor of strengthening the united kingdom -- the vast majority of us is like, distrust, and despite -- the vast majority of , distrust, and despise the liberal democrats. [laughter] is there no better than an aircraft carrier? >> i was eagerly awaiting the question on afghanistan sudley forthcoming. -- sadly forthcoming. >> what is the prime investo during to make sure that foreign nationals engaged terrorist activity in this country will be deported to the country of origin? >> i am grateful to my right hon. friend for raising this question. i think it is extremely important. when there are people threatening our country, foreign nationals, but we don't have the evidence to prosecute them, it is essential that we are able to deport them to their country of origin. what i have asked the foreign secretary to do is to work to draw up agreements with as many countries as possible that we are able to deport these

and if you worked yo whole life for sometngseven da a week, n five days a wk, not 40-ho wee, but every minute every day thatou're awake, grour fami, growg yousiness growing the oprtunities, eating a commuty, creati the kd of american dream that any people came herwith nothing and then built ovetheir lifetimes or their parents built over their lifetimes andant to pass to their children, the other int you mahat thk going t affe tha amrin dreams r debtis ese running deficitshaar unsustainablever time. because ife mount our ildr and our grandchdrenith debt, will crowd out privat investment. ifre spendi the ente deral budget, alof our tax dollars on the combinion of entlentgrams and interen to the national oppornity for pvateout the investment as wes for discretionary spenng within ou own economy. i yield back to the gelemato tell us more about the consequces of these bad polici the kindof bills that hhas oposed t chan all that. mr. latta: well, you kw, you've touched on something, when you' talking abo the ath the eate tax. and you were talking about sothing going om having zero thax this

inpinion truly believe that the united states has the greatest wk force in the world. we have the bestraid work force, we havehe best edated wforcbut need to be put an equal footing. and when companies undstd tht, you know, isikeat all entrepreneur if ty tylenay after day -- if they toil day after day -- i knew someone that had a small bed that could ro uin small bed that could ro uin theiofce or a wife

we are debang this ts wk and it high time that we establishome der an balance. mr. nk get to wat tv too much. bui undersnd the concept of are you smarter than a fifth would you prefer eight mlion jobs lo or uld u prefer over a half million oer perha 3/4's of alion jobs turne i think the fiftader wld say givee job growth, not e job lo. and i think the fif gradeis oing tsay this is pretty lear. 's a contrast that i understand. it's about ois. ist fastnough? wwould allove fastnough anlo millions of jobs in one quarter, but aer we witness 18 1/2lost, over an 18-moh span during the bush receion, th about $ illin, j about $1 trillo. 30% recovery ofhat loss is a movin the righttion. a fifth grader woulsahe would take that. so itecom more and more apparent that the reco act is workg, that it's about small bune, incentiv, x relief for small busesses, search andevelopment, embcing science a chnology, budigrowing and innovatn eno, the are all dynamics. that meana growing economy and cutting gedesign and for at. i tnkt's a stro ceback and nd to mainin the ur of recovery. ms. wa

wel capitalism wks but you alsoeed idance. u edome sort of msurementme sort of discipline that errs o the de of the consumer, the xpaywhver, theall business, and the rovery

mightn'nonprofit will launch next week -- my n-profit will launch next wk. i wwnted to ask chairman frank, you experienced recently the trans partisan that movement coming from outside the beltway. >> i haveea conference that wl deal with that. if there are questions for the military spending on the panel. >> the panel generally discusses troops with what is necessary and what is not. those are in market terms. human rights, a logical battles, what exactly would you deem as necessar >> the human rights issue had generally not been the cause of e military expenditures. >> the point tt we of the side -- that we emphasize is that we are not the oy country on the planet that is concerned about human rights. and we're not the only country on the planet that is concerned about the security of plas or regions orountries. yet we behave as if we are. if you're concerned is averting a human rights catastrophe or even dealing with natural catastrophes arod the world which the military is good at doing, my argument is you can conceive of a place where other countries ar

captioning snsored by macneil/lehrer productions captioned by media access grouph.or at wg wk> sebak: we're all going to die. no way around it. many of us will end up in a cemetersomewhere. every cemetery has its own little story to tell.

decades ago, you used to justo to the airport and wk on ton airplane when they told yout was time. a lot of younger amerins have never experienced that but you ju boarded an airplane. and then they began to hij airports, particularly to cuba, but some oer locations as well, and pretty sn they started screing passengers to make sure they didn't have a weap when they got on, and the reens has become more intensive and more intrusive and nowada, of course the chalnges of screening are pretty substantial. all of us have wched a 6-year-old child being wanded at an art somlace or a catholic nun being intensively scened, you know, so you watch e things an you just shake your head. on the other hand, we understand we want to get on anirple that is fre of weapons and tha is not likely toe commandeered or hacked or threatened, so there is this issue of inconvenience. screening is an inconvenience. the queson is howmuch, and cane d the job necessary for screening and proteche americ peoplend protect the traveling public while reducing the inconvenience to thextent possible. and as senator roc

we kept hearing day after day, week after wk they don't have the votes, they don't have the votes. they are going to make this deal, they are going to make that deal. what did they do? they expanded -- they expanded the exemption. they said, yes, the national rifle association gott a specia exemption. the aarp did. the humane society did. they changed it from a million members to half a million members. but we know most groups won't exempt. just a privileged few. that violates the decisions of the courts going back decades tell you. you cannot discriminate among groups. you cannot have disfavored and favored groups. and that's what we're doing right here on the floor. not just about something dealing with the -- dealt with by the constitution, but the essential of the first amendment. i am surprised that my liberal friends are t down here on this floor condemning provisions of this bill. and they say it's not a perfect bill. no, it's not perfect. it's unconstitutional. it is unconstutional by its very terms. and in the last two weeks and even yesterday it became more unconstitution

>> first of all, let me congratulate him for the wk he does in terms of the veterans. it is extremely important and i welcome what he does. we have a strong ministerial team at the department of health, very strong team at the ministry of defence. i understand the huge pressure that is going tbe put on our held services because mental help stress on peoe who fought in combat. he has might -- we will do everything to help tm. he has my word, that will happen. for all the years into the future. there are figures that suggest that more people commit suicide after the falklands war that were actually killed in combat. i take this extremely seriously, and he has my word that those services will be properly looked after. >> i was greatly encouraged by my right hon. friend'sesponse to catching terrorist suspects, but would you not agree that e best way to get these people is to scrap the human rights act? [laughter] >> my hon. friend, as so often, is going to tempt me. it is very clear that we would be better off with a btish bill of rights rather than the human rights act, a

ld wk guest: tre are horrific of children,rape -rew some physical acts phicalcts.ensive assessnt of to alln who a exposed of of violence, being one of the most horrific forms of a violent -- perhaps being one of the horrific forms of violence a child could experience. host: st.ouis, good mning. caller: susan, thank you for ork and all that you do agree i communicatelast week because i work ithe community, and the against womens increasing throughout the especially among refugees and immigrants. beyond t grants,ow do you address funding disparities for smaller communities? last we discussed this week, but a larger scale, how you addressed nationally defunding disparities? the funding disparities? guest: we have program cald culturally and linguistically specic pgrams to underserved counities. is one of my personal priorities in theffice, to that we are reaching populations. know that statistics are much for african-american forand even higher .women and an to all to reach out thatnities to make sure e available for everybody. host: are there differences in cultural

la wk majority lder hry reid sd quote - "weon't us t tm c-and-t. thomething t been deteromytiary."all rorted lk decrat the hse h a mir res t cad-trad nancyositenyoyer ings sat the dlaration that the cnd-trade proposa is dead. eousesed a bl t inclesheropolastr, buthe issueastalln the nate. that's not bil that ey ve in eenate, peli td reporters. they don'tave a c-a-trade bi. that's not the bill theyin e sen ths the bill twe he in the senate. itap-andra. all ofhosereap-and-t thurrentill,he kerry-lierman bill is caand-ade. theyay change theamef i then they sta trangrounde gornmenticks winners a sers andries tonnce er.ryone thaheill the athe author of t lg a cap-and-tradbill in the senate trie t suggest hil wn't cap-antrade eith sayini don't kno what c-and means. i t think e avera americanoes. dithis isot a cap-and-trill. itolluti-rucon bill is a c-a-traill. but thein when s y and lberman final did intruce r bl, we soon leard att was wsen and-trade bee itas cap-d-tr aoncluded a gas ince. th wds employed or t exten to wch temish to people, c-and-trade will mea re job lses, morain at eimp

was hurrying perhaps there s a test that dn't wk t well. we've heard those rumors and yet we heard the rumor someo yelling the pho after the explosion i told you. i told you. are youpy i td you, something to thaeffe. there are indicatio tha b.p. knew ty were moving too ft and g less. there's no rean for this. no reas for this. propemeasures had been taken. one of the pems we find in america ishen the government decis get involved and do erything themselvesathe than having thesupvisor, th regulatory role that it's sposed to have. iotr rds, what the federal governme is supped to do is make sure ybody plays fair and have them play. and if you have a company that's playing on federal ocn areas, weot to make surtheye no breaking the rules and jpardizing your homeland. anwhen asking the dictor of the minals management sce why it was the teing had not been disos andhe said it's under investigation. those rerts are being utilized in an veigatn. and i asked in our hearinfoa copy of the reports rgs bause we know experts as well that can look at t ror

and checks are going to start goin out this wk to people, the0,000 that have fallen into the doughnut hole, of $250. try a help them pay for that. we are going to hand out this pription drug doughnut hole. the speaker pro tempe: the gentleman's tias eired. for what pur ds th gentlelady from washington rise? >> tha you, mr. speaker. i k peission to address the house for one nute revisend extend. . it's time the speaker o tempore: without jection. mrs. mcmorris rodgers: you knadershipuires making toh desions and ye we stand re today as members of congress witthe majori not en sending us a budget. the obamadministration did propose a budge it wa $3.8 trillion funded with revenue thad $2.2 trillion. the majority doesn't even seem owwhenn spratt -- when dt. we re in the marity and john spratt said if you can't forwd a budget you can't govern and yet today don't s a dget all across this country, amerifamilies have had to readdress their budget, make tough decisions in their family households. that's whatou do ring difficult times. businesses have had make tough disions andet this congress i

other schools, they cannot make it wk matter how much money. my right hand and graduated from e of the worst schools in the president. he came from a broken home and qualified for free lunch. his mother decided education was first and foremost. he got it down. my wife is a first-rate schooleacher. she says congressman and first graders have a lot in common. no chi should did the third grade that is not at or above the third grade reading -- reading level. that is a long-te goal that we n fix. we have to get the dollars to the classroom. we need discipline. we need for the ability for teachers and principals to decide if that child needs to leave the classroom. we need school choice. my children were home school. there went to a christian school and probably that would from public school. one size education does not fit all. >> the next question is directed to nikki haley. >> where do you stand on the state gambling laws which outlaws all games? the specific question is -- >> i think there are a lot of things we can focus on. one is creating job

businesses to be able to provide health surance to employee they nt tovidinsurance r those erand fathers th wk for themryay who haveomed and dicated somimes they are family businessesbut now th wilbe ableo do so. the hnutole atas th mo horrific te some ye ago, medicare part d, we we on thfloor t houil 6:00 becausour frndson the r side ale couldn't get the v but 's horfic. it means that you pay for yr prescription drugs th a g through e roofntil you, as a senio, falln he ho cause u tarophic illnees. what an atrocity. we are going tose that hole in the next two years anas well,ightow, senis should be reiving a $250 chin ouhands right now. we recognize the undermining of your health care becae of medicare pt d. it s unrealistically exnsive an it was a plan that we democrs ve indicatedt was a ong-headed decisi and we rt of our deficithat has poken so loudlybout was cased by medicareart d and the large jority of our pt our ucus voted again it, alizg was wng-head diction to take. let mappld is heah care bill for recoizinthat as you expandpptuties -- and here was another gativehath naysaywould y. u c

and the of us wh wk for him y to example by that virtue by talking personally to the experts, the authoritiesd to average folks about these issues. while we were doing the work of building our open government plans on an agency by agency basis, we decided that we needed in the white house, that we wanted to seize on opportuniti opportunities, both to send a message to our colleagues in vernment, and also to the american people, that we're going to conduct our business in a more open ad transparent way. and perhaps the best known example of that is a decision of the white house to put its visitor access records on a so-called ways record on the internet for everyone in the press anthe american people to see. so that everyone in the country can know exactly who is coming and going from the white house, as some of you may know, other adnistrations have fought for many years to rotect just a handful of visitor records ha to do with vari task forces that operate in the white house. we resolved open ltigation, and announced policy moving forward of posting our visitor records monthly. and i'm pleas

let's say at least a wk, w interchange betw the orinallans, the etc. ncerns, but 2 1/2 weeks. then i'm told -- again, i've learned what i've been i know, b then i'told theredgers that woulbe used to make the burns are in the upper mississippi, n was il the decisio mae, the dredging, they were not begun toe towed. now, clearly that's a lack of alacrity. you need a focus and energy in he 2 esponse to shorten t 1/2-week period to a week. we in louisiana ar fstrated by that. thank you for you sympathy. host: melville, new york. republican line. alex, good morning. caller: good morning. to respond to the issue of removing or raising thliability limits. the notion that you puthe liabilithigh at $10 blion going to preclud smaller , i think as dills ingenuous. wh about the notn of prate enterprise and buying insurae for that? carolina om north mentioned earlier, if you had little company and they created mess, the trust fund would cover i well, private enterprise a insurance would be fine. thisay it should underwrite e that the make sur with laws and safet werere to figure their value

more complex structured product in a farore voluminous way in a time frame that gets shortened from wks or months to literally days, and when it's the oput that's focused on and not necessarily the quality of the output, it clearly creates a dynamic. and so i want to talk a little bit about how you felt or what was the mental set? because in looking at what you do, i'm very much struck by the comparisons that you might make. anybodyooking at wall street or looking at investment banks, it just always has to me a kind of auction atmosphere. it's very hectic. there's pressure. timeline biddingnd so on. in looking and especially in reading about what you folks do, it just seemed to be much more an academic atmosphere at least earlier about -- even coming together as committees it off discuss how we do and wt does it look like a suggesting changes that might be made. i'll come back to that in a minute. so when you say that you're compensated, what did that mean? was any of i truly in your mind as the chairman referenced rated to the volume of what you were doing, quality versus quantity? how