seeing no other public comment, then you have rebuttal, three minutes of rebuttal, my woitek. >> i'm sorry, son of the person that just spoke, could you give your address to the planning

seeing no other public comment, then you have rebuttal, three minutes of rebuttal, my woitek. >> i'm sorry, son of the person that just spoke, could you give your address to the planning gentleman, i'm sure he's checking right now to see if you are on the mailing list. >> sure. thank you. >> miss woitek, you have three minutes of rebuttal, your time. >> number one, i would like to say that san francisco building code 2 in several places distinguishes between building under 50 feet and over 50 feet. it's a big distinction, number one. number two, we need, whenever you have nonconforming property like this one, you need a full environmental review. no review was conducted, no one came to our property to talk to the residents. how was it going to be impacted, to build, to impose 15 feet wall or 17, 18 on top of this narrow space between two buildings, with windows leading to a staircase is inhuman, and so -- and also section 134 calls for, you cannot give section -- do away with section 134, for nonconforming property. this is a nonconforming property, and there are no exceptions. they