wolform. >> it looks like chinatown has not had a survey or a context statement. is that accurate? >> i thought it did. >> it looked like there was a hole in the one that you had that showed the context statements and looked like there was a hole around chinatown and i, too, think it'i don't thinky because this looks like north beach and it doesn't look like the historic content statements either. >> chinatown has had a lot of previous evaluations done, different times, different approaches and how it's shown in the map may not be 100% accurate to what the data sources we have are, because some of those evaluations in the past have looked at it only for local designation. some of them have looked at it for national register designation or section 6 evaluations. it's definitely one of the neighborhoods that i would say has the most layers of previous evaluation that are extremely confewinconfusing to pick apart. having worked on several projects there and try to explain what that -- what we already know versus what we think we already know because we know that there has been previou

. >> president wolform, after ten years of being here, we wanted to extend our sincere appreciation and we've gotten you a certificate from the historic preservation from 2009 to 201 and your commitment to preserving the historically and culturculturally heritage of san francisco. san francisco. we thank you for your time and you'll be missed. we wish you well. (applause). >> thank you. >> item four, consideration of draft minutes for the arc hearing of january 16, 2019, the regular hearing of january 16, 2019, the joint hearing with the san francisco planning commission on january 24, 2019 and regular hearing of february 26, 2019. i havjanuary 26. i have to speaker cards. >> any member of the public wish to comment on the minutes? >> i wanted to mention the property i was talking about is 848 13th street, 94130. >> we're taking public comment on the minutes right now. thank you. >> closed public comment to the commission. i. >> i move to adopt the minutes. >> second. >> commissioner black? >> yes. >> commissioner john's? so moved commissioners and that motion passes unanimously 6-0. i'