that is what was a remarkable to see the names like chaney, wolfowitz, rumsfeld, saying he is the keeper of the flame and to use the words provocative weakness when he was defense secretary. we even see it today with the back-and-forth between president obama and former vice president cheney. what cheney is really saying is when you don't use like words like war on terror or use of words you are therefore projecting weakness and in 518v attacks. it is no-space and 40 years and during through that journey and a cast of many who started in 69 are 70 and reached the limit in 2009. that is a key element to understand this and kramer's role is unique. he opens a door to the nixon administration we have never seen before and it allows us to see things we have never seen before and how things were done to undermine the policies and in the end if you think about it and general haig is the ultimate cramer i eighth, if you buy that, then he should protect the president but he doesn't he does everything he can to make sure dickson does not survive. we have looked at lighthouse tapes after the smoki

people like wolfowitz, the other neocons, that brought us into iraq, and now we are going to spend 60 years rehabilitating our soldiers. host: any comment? guest: of course, american policy is up to the american people. one thing we have not discussed is our policy toward the israelis. whether we want to be involved in fighting in their wars in the future is something americans should be able to talk about. they may vote yes. but the question is we need to talk about it. ultimately, is real is a country of no strategic worth to the u.s. they have no resources we need, their manpower is minimal. their association with us is a negative for the indicted states. that is a fact, and what you want to do about that is different. for anyone to say that our support does not hurt us in the muslim world is to justify a reality. host: richard on the republican line. good morning. caller: i would like to hear an answer to the first caller. that well-dressed man brought that person up to the counter without a passport. him and his wife are lawyers. host: you are breaking up a little bit, richard. m

like paul wolfowitz, like pat robertson, like ariel sharon, like george bush, bin laden thinks a lot of things that are unreasonable. bin laden is admired. some clearly admire him because of his least reasonable beliefs. many admire him because they feel there's something wrong with the circumstances in which they lief. and bin laden's anger symbolizing for them a desire for a better life. that desire is not at all unreasonable. late september, autumn begins. not unlike those unfortunate individuals who have become addicted to pornography on the internet. a frightening number of americans seek temporary relief in nationalistic fantasy from the unsatisfying completeness of their daily lives. and then they become hooked. it's been going on for years. their dream is not about sex or pleasure. it's not even about beautiful fields or ocean waves. it's a dream about blood that flows from the wombs from the enemy nation. just as the male pornography addict identifies with and rebelled in the exploit of the triumphant naked male in the pornographic scene, the american national addict identif

people like wolfowitz, the other neocons, that brought us into iraq, and now we are going to spend 60ears rehabilitating our soldiers. host: any comment? guest: of course, american policy is up to the american people. one thing we have not discussed is our policy toward the israelis. whether we want to be involved in fighting in their wars in the future is something americans should be able to talk about. they may vote yes. but the question is we need to talk about it. ultimately, is real is a country of no strategic worth to the u.s. they have no resources we need, their manpower is minimal. their association with us is a negative for the indicted states. that is a fact, and what you want to do about that is different. for anyone to say that our support does not hurt us in the muslim world is to justify a reality. host: richard on the republican line. good morning. caller: i would like to hear an answer to the first caller. that well-dressed man brought that person up to the counter without a passport. him and his wife are lawyers. host: you are breaking up a little bit, richard. mic

and christopher mayer told us he perceived changes, fractions to carry out with others with paul wolfowitzhe line we are taking according to christopher mayer and others of that time was they were indicating that if the americans were going for regime change but were prepared to build a coalition they were indicating that the kingdom was prepared to be part of that. now conditions than state which i want to come on to in a minute, but if that message was already going to the white house before march was your advice being pre-empted? >> i wouldn't use the word pre-empted, there was a debate going on and my minute i guess reflected part of that. me also say it was in part a debate about how you handle the americans and what has to be said from this is the overall results or the work done by the prime minister by me and many others, jeremy greene stocks, christopher mayer and many others was that we had converged to achieve the policy objectives that we wanted which was the commitment by the united states to go down the u.n. route for the purpose not of regime change but of dealing with the t