, paul wolfowitz, a republican, he put forward a proposal, it was... after the collapse of the sovietthat the us should never allow any country in the world to be so influential as to threaten any us interests. this doctrine leaked into the newspapers was criticized even by the new york times, because it was too imperialistic, but this concept has never left us national security policy. that's why many people in the us say that the war in ukraine is a us war against russia using ukrainians. the goal is to defeat the russians. to make sure that there is no power in the world, as wolfowitz said, that could challenge us interests. the russians will never agree to ukraine becoming a member of nato. do not forget that these are people who lost 25-30 million people during world war ii. i believe that this war in ukraine can only be resolved in the context of discussing this multipolar problem. dmitry. speaks the pure truth, because, of course, the wolfets doctrine was criticized in the newspapers, well then he himself was involved in various scandals, but in fact, but this was the official

states, by the way, which well... in march of ninety -two, the chadney memorandum, it wasn't only wolfowitz who was there, he was just the first name there, he had socks with holes, yes, one, one, he had one, there was no second one at all, a mosque, moreover, the thing is that i would like to correct, this idea was not born now, this idea was born, it was laid down in the memorandum, which was... let's turn around and russia will be here europe will put pressure on us, and we will put pressure on china, because there is no one else to put pressure on it, it will bounce back to the middle east again, that's what bush did. when he said in 2000, during the election campaign, my main rival for my administration will be china, but he ended up in iraq. obama said that, who said: "i will be the first pacific president, the president of america." and then the arab awakening came, and he ended up there again. now trump and biden have said the same thing. and both ended up there again in the middle east. east. that's why it doesn't work out. the united states can't solve its three-problem problem, t

that came over to the defense department, to the transition team which was paul wolfowitz and me and not much anybody else. you are then trying to respond to a white house that wants to get underway. within the agencies you only have really the permanent government. that is one of the features, the good features of our system. the president comes in with a whole raft of political appointees who translate the mandate from the american people in the election. translate that into policy. they need to interface with the permanent government, a repository of expertise in history if you will of a particular issue. that tension is very constructive in our process. it reconciles political imperatives with continuity with the past. the problem is the white house is way ahead of the agencies. i remember you asked me to have a deputies meeting about march or april of that first year. i did. when people showed up they were all part of the permanent government. no representatives from the bush administration confirmed by the congress, by the senate. there is a time lag time. everyone thinks on ja

doctrine, paul wolfowitz, a republican, he put forward a proposal, this was after the collapse of thenited states should never... allow any country in the world to be so influential as to threaten any interests of the united states. this doctrine leaked into the newspapers, was criticized even by the new york times, because it was too imperialistic. but this concept never left politics national security of the united states. that's why many people in the united states say that the war in ukraine is a us war against russia using ukrainians. the goal is to defeat the russians. to make sure that there are no powers in the world. the newspapers criticized the woolfiuds doctrine, well then he himself was involved in various scandals, but in fact, well, it was the official doctrine of the united states, and you know, there was no collusion, so my second point is macron's word on his speech, but it's scary, what you just showed in the program, this is a man, who is shaking... well, he is afraid, even if he spoke french, but he is afraid from the realization that the sovereign, that is, the u