and it matched daniel woloson., lieutenant echols would need another dna test to confirm the dna results from the cigarette. until then, echols wanted to prevent woloson from fleeing, so he tried a ruse. from him that would give me enough to get an arrest warrant. i gave him the story about the witness, which is not true. i tell him that there was a person that he worked with at the quad apartments who had stepped forward and had seen daniel woloson walking down a path behind wright 1 carrying a yellow backpack during the evening that she was murdered. and i took it just a little bit further and told him that i had a fingerprint that was identified to him from that backpack. and then immediately, without me saying a thing, he said, "you know, i only took $10 from that backpack," so i knew he was telling me the truth. >> so woloson was arrested and he was forced to provide an additional dna sample. that test left no doubt he was the source of the dna found on susan schumake. prosecutors cannot fathom a reason for su