is will play wonderfully on c-span. we will see how you write it down.what animates this is an imagined desire to be topped by the law which is live in the bodies of gays and lesbians but which exceeds an instrumental account of material benefits of marriage. i am struck by how quickly the argument that marriage confers 1100 or so benefits that they men and lesbians are not getting, gives way to an argument about the importance of the california case of feeling married, feeling in my bones, a feeling in my body that i am married. i call it 6 law because i believe this year earnings to feel married is a sort of them body pleasure. i am lining up here. bodies and pleasure. even though marriage law in many ways made possible by this, we need to think about the ways in which it is still the site for a kind of afterlife which has to do with desires and pleasures and bodies at the level of our collective ideological imagination. so it is a fantasy. but marriage law, the comparative historical and critical accounts catherine gives of the african-american and lg