ecosystem has evolved over hundreds of years, and i love having the skunks, hawks, coyotes, howls, woodpeckers, all of these animals, and they're living free in their while. they are my neighbors. we all really get along. i want to preserve this. so, yes, not in favor of the natural areas program, as is currently working. i am very, very concerned that not only monies from the bond may actually go to the program but would be used in a manner consistent with this program's philosophy, which i find to be radical and destructive of all of this natural ecosystem that i loved so much, resulting in adding toxins and plants that are not going to make it anymore. i really oppose nap. if there were a vote held today on the bond, i would vote no because of my concerns for this. i think i can certainly be brought around if you can get nap and the destructive philosophy put to bed. the presenter presented one of the main concerns, from the citizen outreach, to fix what is broken. i think nap is breaking what is working. we need to fix what is broken. we're in very tight financial times. we should be extre