the united nations world bank report estimates that canola farmers in canada and corn farmers in the united states lose a combined six hundred million dollars a year to european g.m.o. free markets conventional farmers may find some markets close to them because their chili is genetically engineered but i think it may ruin all the markets for their advantage growers also the north american free trade act would force and i'm su to share its technology with america's competitors if they develop this chip this connection to their choice seed they don't have to go to mexico they can take the seed and go to mexico mexico peru or china or wherever else and so it's not going to benefit the new the new mexico farmers it whatever technology they can adopt or competitors can adopt so i'm not sure how this is going to solve their problems. resistance to chemically intensive genetically modified foods is increasing worldwide including bans labeling requirements and companies advertising their foods as g.m.o. free. consumer demand for g.m.o. products fifteen years after their introduction is still

the united nations world bank report estimates that canola farmers in canada and corn farmers in the united states lose a combined six hundred million dollars a year to european g.m.o. free markets conventional farmers may find some markets close to them because their chili is genetically engineering but i think it may ruin all the markets for their advantage growers also the north american free trade act would force and i miss you to share its technology with america's competitors if they develop this to this next internet choice seed they don't have to go to mexico they can take the seed and go to mexico mexico peru or china or wherever else and so it's not going to benefit the new the new mexico farmers it whatever technology they can adopt or competitors can adopt so i'm not sure how this is going to solve their problems. resistance to chemically intensive genetically modified foods is increasing worldwide including bans labeling requirements and companies advertising their foods as g.m.o. free. consumer demand for g.m.o. products fifteen years after their introduction is still vi

world war ii global architecture. >> guest: exactly. >> host: the united nations on the diplomatic side -- >> guest: and the world bank. >> host: and the world bank and the imf, international monetary fund. on the other side and what was mind-boggling when i read the book about harry dexter white and keynes is that the man who created that architecture almost became the first imf president, american-nominated president. that was the soviet spy who presents a very respectable front, but, in fact, when people researched his archives, was a staunch marxist economist. >> guest: exactly. but he did more than that. he was instrumental in bringing the united states and japan to war. >> host: how did he do that? >> guest: well, this is the incredible thing. he was the deputy to henry morgan thaw who's secretary of the treasury -- >> host: an important deputy. >> guest: henry was not a particularly skillful treasury secretary, economist, and he relied heavily -- >> host: close friends -- >> guest: he was a close friend and neighbor of fdr which counted for more than it should have, and harry dexter white was able to manipulate morgan thaw merci

the united nations. we are witnessing to people who are soviet spies creating the post world war ii global architecture of the diplomatic size and the world bank and the imf for the other side and what is mind boggling about harry dexter white in case that the man who created that architecture almost became the first imf president president, american nominated president. but when people would reach the archive and as a staunch marxist economies. >> he did more than that and was instrumental. >> how did he do that? >> he was the deputy to the secretary of the treasury. >> he was an important deputy he was not just a skillful treasury secretary. >> he was a close friend and neighbor of fdr and harry dexter white was able to miss is something that came out in the '90s. because they probably expected to do that with new york want and then they had lunch at the grill that is still across the street from the treasury and he gave him and the diplomats at that time were working very hard this would be in 1941. one and then the american ultimatum for war. >> it was sent but even before that trying to cut -- to look at the materials so trying to prevent

imf and the world bank still operate and are needed, but as alternative sources of credit and capital take their place, few countries look to them for guidance. in new york, the united nations, which gained momentum in the cold war ended, has been sidetracked. as for u.n. peacekeeping, it is given the assignments that no one else wants. back when i was ambassador of the united nations, i was besieged by members of congress who worried that our sovereignty would be trampled on by world government. today, we should worry less about the ambition of multilateral institutions than because there are vital tasks that only they can do. when serving in the clinton administration, i felt america's goal was to bring nations closer together in pursuit of freedom, law, and peace. the obama team has the same objective, but the process has been made more complex by the trends. with so much going on, our leaders often have to proceed a case by case basis, improvising in the search for solutions to particular problems. in one case, we might turn to nato. we might have to act alone. at the same time, we have to strive to create more effective networks for addressing shared problems, such as

imf, and the world bank still operate and are needed but as alternative sources of credit and capital take their place, few countries look to them for sole guidance. in new york the united nations, which gained momentum when the cold war ended, has in fact been sidetracked and as for u.n. peacekeeping, it has given the assignments no one else wants, such as stablizing the congo without the money or equipment to get the job done. back when i was ambassador to the united nations i was besieged by members of congress who worried that our sovereignty would be trampled on by world government. today, we should worry less about the ambition of multilateral institutions than about their impotence because they're a vital task thats only they can do and that aren't being done very well. . . >> in one case we might turn to nato, in another to an ad hoc coalition, in a third to the u.n. and in a fourth we might have to act alone. at the same time, we have to strive to create more effective networks for addressing shared problems such as proliferation, terror, the global economy and development. these imperatives lead, in my mind, to three essential points. the first is that our national se