everybody says well we should keep this deal because it blocks wrawn's path to the bomb.it doesn't. it guarantee's iran's path to the bomb. judge jeanine: why did the u.k., france, germany, you gave the proof, the evidence on assad, why are they still in the deal? >> i think they are kicking the can ford. can -- the can forward. you will get the ability to enrich you rain yaw -- enrich um for 100 bombs, that's what this deal says. so i think the president is absolutely right, both smashing the cash machine for iran's address and ambitions of empire, and telling them you are not going to go with our approval, housekeeping steel of approval. within 7 years have unlimited enrichment. >> why haven't arabs learned that any attempt at military engagement with israel is going to inure to their detriment? >> i think they do. if you look at the arab world as a whole. there is a change in the way they see israel. they see israel not as an enemy, but an ally against their common threat. the threat is iran. our relations with many of the arab countries has undergone a profound transf

if you think about it, every independent counsel investigation we had in modern times, watergate, wrawn-contrae president and the public always knew exactly what was under investigation. so to the extent the months cuter wanted investigative secrecy you have that to the extent the law permits it. but everybody had their eyes open about what's under investigation. here the president has operated for a year and a half not knowing what's suspected of. being told he's not suspect but at the same time they are making public announcements that cast suspicion on him. i think he overreacts at times. i think the tweeting is counter productive. lou: but i think it's frustration we all feel. i think his tweets are the equivalent of fdr's radio. he's taking advantage of the technology and the opportunity to speak directly to the american people. i think only a fool would not do so. >> i'm not saying he shouldn't tweet. i'm saying it's a mistake to tweet about investigation. it complicates and elongates them. we are seeing some of that. lou: i don't know who bears the responsibility fourth elongation. but

a lot of people like me who have been critical of the deal suspected for a long time, namely that wrawn prior to the deal was actively pursuing nuclear weapons and even after the deal they got flush with $150 billioning in sanctions relief. obama airlifted $1.7 billion in cold hard cash to the mullahs. yet they continued to seek nuclear weapons. the deal was bad when it was signed. it hasn't achieved what obama promised. i think the president would be within 100% of his rights to pull us out of this deal and put more pressure on iran. lou: the president said from the outset netanyahu corroborated what he said. that the iranians have been at the very least deceptive throughout and it's the worst deal he has ever seen. no one can to this day answer what in the world the united states got in this bargain with the islamic republic. >> remember, too, we tried to get at the time the secret side agreement between the iaea and iran. that was something the obama administration did not produce to congress. i thought that was discussed reason to vote against the deal. you wonder why they kept that