>vice-president cindy wu: any public comment? >> hello, i'm mark telley, i represent the san francisco community and i would like to present the petition to please asking the commission to please deny this event. this particular building is extremely historical significance to my community. in 1966 febe's was the first t -- leather bars. because of this, herb came called folsom street the miracle mile called febe's. at the historical society said this is an extremely significant building to that history of the community. in fact, next sunday, the folsom street fair will have 200 plus thousand people in our community and it all started at 1501. i do also want to submit this next meeting of the historical landmark preservation commission so this building will get the landmark status that it truly deserves. >vice-president cindy wu: thank you. is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner richards? >> my question is -- i didn't get your name. the ground that you have for your petition re

>vice-president cindy wu: thank you. let's keep in touch through the commission secretary and the director about the subcommittee. >> commissioner moore? >>commissioner kathrin moore: is it possible do you ever prepare a summary of which buildings were added to the historic district that you mentioned. it would be interesting to know which ones they are? >> i'm not sure? which historic district? >> you said jackson square,alamo square. >> they are for existing designated properties. we weren't adding properties. >> we would like to see what they are because there is so much on the margin of all of that. it would be great for us to see. >> happy to provide that information. city clerk: commissioners if there is nothing further we can address the public comment period. public comment:at this time, members of the public may address the board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the board except agenda items. with respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the board

>vice-president cindy wu: thank you, is there additional public comment? >> my name is daniel wu. i live next door to the proposed tower about 15 feet. we share the same wall. i'm very concerned about this situation and i learned about this late, but i did read the report online and still feel very concerned about it. i have two daughters 10 and 14. it doesn't tell me how people of different age is going to react to this situation. i have been a loyal customer of at & t and used for several yearsen my house and we have same services. we never have any problem using this at home with at & t. i strongly object to this approval of conditional use of the tower and also object to be able to kind of limit it. normal life in this neighborhood. especially i'm a close neighbor of this up and coming proposed tower. thank you. >vice-president cindy wu: thank you. is there additional public comment? >> commissioners, i just want to speak in opposition to the antenna as well. it's not my neighborhood, but i hope you all understand that if you read the small print that comes with your phone, it

commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes those items have been single roll call vote of the commission. . there will be no separate discussion of these items. castle in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 2 case no. 201448 c at 28 hundred request inform discretionary review authorization and 2233 union street request for discretionary review authorization please note on august 14th following the testimony the commission adapted a policy for a vote commissioner johnson and commissioner moore and commissioner wu voting against and continuing commissioner richards you'll have to publicly announce the fact you've reviewed the materials prior to today's hearing >> i have. >> thank you. i have no speaker cards >> any public comment on that item on the consent calendar. >> seeing none, public comment is closed. >> commissioner rishdz. >> i'd like to move to have those on the calendar please.

>vice-president cindy wu: next speaker? >> good afternoon, my name is role and, i have attended common wealth events since 1989 and a member. the decision that you have before you is an opportunity to uphold your preservation credentials. you don't to have rubber stamp the recommendations. what i recommend you do is go back to the planning department and have them correct some of the inaccuracies they put in there. so, for example, the owners and occupants of 113 stuart street include a variety of commercial tennants serving the water front uses and none appear to local contribution of local or state history. the staff s done that. they have made a mistake. i would recommend you go back and take a second look at their recommendations. the other thing i noticed about the 20 pagesch recommendations they made was they countered every single argument. that is not true. look at your history. this is more of a temple than it is just a building. according to page and turn bowl, it wasn't just a facade on the stuart street side tha

>vice-present cindy wu: thank you. i see a member of supervisor breed 's office. >> thank you, from supervisors breed, sponsor of this legislation. welcome commissioner johnson and richards. this is the first time i have the oppounity to present to you, so congratulations. just to give a brief background on arcades and pinball machines in san francisco. pinball was sometimes a gambling enterprise and there were concerns back then about the impact it had on the city and crime and various derelict activities and that continues in the haight area that were attracting the hell's angels and then in 1982 work-cited -- with the rise of arcade games that they were taking over the city, turning the fowl of the youth and down turn modern civilization. the board of supervisors passed expense -- extensive regulation, regretting where and how and when arcade games can take place in san francisco. that is what supervisor breed has now amended and updated. by way of example to give you a sense of what that police code did. it prohibi

>vice-president cindy wu: thank you. is there additional public comment? >> commissioners, i just want to speak in opposition to the antenna as well. it's not my neighborhood, but i hope you all understand that if you read the small print that comes with your phone, it's pretty scary. these things are not safe and neither are the antennas. it's often said, there is no proof that they are dangerous. but the question you should be asking is if there is proof that they are safe and there isn't. the small print often says that warns you about keeping these phones away from specific parts of your body. i guess the parts you consider are important. so there is too many in the city and i would support these people and oppose this. i'm an at & t customer. thanks. is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >vice-president cindy wu: commissioner johnson? >> thank you very much. yeah. i actually support this project, i think that the site selection analysis was very thorough in its selection. i k

>vice-president cindy wu: commissioner hillis? it depends on how we act here and kind of what this building was used for before. it's an interesting but first on the p.m.d i would agree with staff that this adequately addresses and talks a lot about these issues here and adequately addresses the impact of the project. this is a little bit unusual that the project doesn't come back for us but i guess it's code compliant, but i believe the p.m.d responds in the project itself. i don't think are necessarily related to the p.m.d. first of all in the 2009 project there was a lot of discussion brought up about the project. can somebody give us a brief history of what that project did and what the board of supervisors was talking about took some action to designation this building what it did do after that? >> i might be able to start. the project before you in 200 # 9 was a proposed office building of 30 feet in height that would require a change to the zoning. it was an office building of 130 feet. they supported that proposal 4-3 and

>vice-president cindy wu: thank you. next speaker? >> good afternoon, commissioners, my name is angela. my family and i own the property at 2206 to 2216 polk street. the subject property is one of our prized buildings. we inherited the vision when we purchased the property back in 2006. interior vision struggled to pay their rent from the beginning. we gave them numerous concessions and extra time to pay the rent and we helped them for several years since we owned the property. they voluntarily closed their doors in 2013 and did not renew their lease. we contracted gladys reality to assist us in renting the space and we contracted with them in san francisco and always been happy with the tenant profile. amanda and billy were presented to us and were not only the strongest qualifiers, but they are experienced with two other bay area restaurants and their concept excited our family a lot and we believe that they will be a great addition to the block. the neighborhood and also the community at large. we believe in this project and we str

>vice-president cindy wu: opening for public comment. >> excuse me.the project sponsor team gets 10 minutes. >> good afternoon, i'm ana mock an chair of the board of the common wealth club one of many volunteers in san francisco who lead and support the club. as mentioned the club has 22,000 members and a 50 member board. our membership and prap is completely open to the public. we would all those attended in support of the common wealth club please stand. we have worked hard to design a building that serves the communities interest as a public gathering place. while being environmentally sound also paying tribute to the history of our site and the san francisco water front. to combat global warming is essential today that buildings are designed fore lower consumption. because of the glass facade on the embarcadero there are multiple windows that open. this allows the building to be cooled without outside air and carbon emissions. the club asks you to uphold emissions of the planning department. thank you for your consideration. now welcome the club a

>vice-president cindy wu: commissioner moore? >>commissioner kathrin moore: i want to make sure i understand the comments. you are addressing the equipment side on services something that could be solved in the library of equipment which could be used by others. that has been done for other elements buchlt i want to make sure about the discussion about cost prohibitive looks at the cost of health and lack of health. that's the provision of ducting and filter replacement. i want to make sure i understand that distinction properly because there is two parts to this particular legislation. >> yes, i'm sorry. >> did i hear you say that because cost prohibitive is not the entire thing but the aspect of delivery of services and equipment necessary to meet this new requirement? >> yes. >> thank you. >> having said that, i think we could not be clearly enough to understand the cost of impact of ill health in terms of lost wages and in terms of untimely death and that is what drives this thing and i would support your thoughts that this d

commissioner president wu. commissioner fong. commissioner antonini. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. we do expect commissioner hillis arriving late. commissioners, first on your calendar is items for continuance item one at 320 through 4 hundred paul discretionary use authorization for continuance. item b and c at 660 third discretionary review authorization are proposed for september 11, 2014. item 3. for the next case at 19 through 25 mason street request for compliance and variance are proposed for continuance until september 18th. item 4 at one 10 stewart street a negative declaration is proposed for few minutes until september 4th item 5 for the next case at 14 telegraph hill, 20th street discretionary review authorization until october 9, 2014, pr item 6 case the patrick rode and gun club a appraisal of a perimeter negative declarations froept for continuance october 23rdrd. commissioners under our discretionary review calendar items 19 on green street a may or may not discr

commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. >> go ahead and move to approve items can i do it if bulk 13 abc. >> d is a variance sorry. >> the zoning administrator. >> on that motion to adapt the sequa finding to approval the determination of compliance and the consideration of the general plan referral. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong. commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously zoning administrator would say close the public hearing and grant the variance >> thank you commissioners i zoning administrator that will place you on item 16 of your regular calendar for the next case. at 2369 mission street request for conditional use authorizati authorization. >> good afternoon. eric can jackson planning staff before you, you have a conditional use authorization to establish a new retail mobile within one thousand one hundreds square feet on mission street

commissioner president wu. no arrest so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 4 to 3 with richard and moore and wu voting against it >> zoning administrator what say you. >> it's the variance hearing also with an intent to approve. and very good commissioners that places you on our discretionary review portion item 13 was continued and so items 14 ab at 9 tentacle street a may or may not discretionary review in case. also for 9 tentacle street >> carolyn. good evening planning department staff you have before you a question for the may or may not discretionary review for demolition pursuant to the planning code. it's located on carolyn street between 23 and 22 street in the katrero student it is to demolish a dwelling unit. the public notification was complete and no applications were filed, however, since the distribution of the pact staff has received additional letters and neighbors have expressed the concerns over the height and one neighbor has concerned asking concerns wanders to the windows on the sid

>vice-president cindy wu: commissioner richards? >> i was surprised to receive these documents from the heritage in the mail. we look at lands and the building and maybe what happened there, but from a cultural point of view we have a little bit of catching up to do. i know the gay and lesbian adopted and the african american and i know there is a latino context statement made. the part of what makes san francisco is the social and cultural heritage that we have. case in point, if you go online and look at our book on living history, some of the things that have been publicized around changes in the social and cultural heritage started with the pipe piper bar and you could probably speak to that. if we have the pipe piper and the tonga room go away, what is san francisco going to look like. we that had eagle go away which is the bar but came back and i know sam owe is gone and if you ever read tails of the city. i really think that getting our arms around for these kind of businesses is good. and one of the pamphlets about the strat

commissioner fong p commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. >> the commission will take a 15 minute break. >> and welcome back to the planning commission regular hearing for thursday, august 14, 2014. commissioners we left off under our regular calendar and will be talking up 1213 abc and for those causatises also known as moscone center please notice the admiring ends on june 16, 2014, it public comment may not be respond to in writing case numbers 13 e k r v and x under the california quality act determination for consideration of general plan referral and request for variances >> commissioner moore. >> the city attorney has advised that i ask for recusal on o this my decade employment may invoke the impression tailors or there's a conflict of interest. >> motion inform recuse. >> on that motion to rouse commissioner moore. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu