and the wuhan university. the second thing is, we had a high level chinese official come from china's academy of sciences on november 19 where he did a couple of interesting things. his day of arrival was notable because he was the subject of an internal posting on the virology website that indicated that he ran what was likely a p sure, a chinese mechanism of reporting that often goes through the political channels to the highest level that is needed to resolve an issue or problem. that individual sends back down instructions. it appears that this chap from beijing was carrying orders from xi jinping himself that indicated there were concerns around by security around the wuhan and the two of virology and in fact that he was lecturing them about issues that were a matter of national concern. we do know on the 19th of november a senior official from the chinese academy of sciences, the lead bio security official came down and met with senior leadership and brought with him a p sure, which is orders from high l

this virus as it in wuhan. and in january of 2020, 96.2% similar. so people said, i even overstated this when i was in australia flapping my jaw that oh, this is very, very similar. this proves that it came from a bat. well, not quite 96% similarity for coronaviruses implies 40 or 50 years of diverged. it's divergent evolution. so that's a pretty significant. so two different viruses that started off from the same ancestor may have continued their lineage in two different bat populations once isolated from each other for 40 or 50 years. and the result just by random mutation, if not adaptation to different circumstance, would be that they might be 4% different. so so we knew that there was this one virus, but this not this the virus. i'll give it a name. rat g 13. that was the close match. rat g 13 actually there's supposed to i'm supposed to call it ratg13, but i like calling it rat g 13, so rat g was the closest but not that close still suggested that this virus came from bats in particular from horseshoe bat

wuhan institute got 1.4 million.ived money that ends at wuhan lab for gain of function research in wuhan. duke university, half million dollars alone between these five years and guess where it goes? the military medical scientists, this is army of people's liberation army. biological war fare, wuhan institute could try to get the next cure for disease or make a biological bomb. why finance this type of research? why a cozy relationship between fauci and the wuhan institute? move ahead and look at what we're looking at now, this is wuhan institute, 240,000 from us over course of 2014 to 2016. $200,000 to wuhan institute and uc davis. look where we are now between our countries. despite poisoning the world with pandemic, nothing but belligerent to us with their program trying to cut us off at the knee with influence around the globe. remember the spy balloon? shot down after traversing every military facility and going across our entire country, even through alaska and they are mad at us for taking it out. how were we

and after all this time, did covid—i9 really escape from a laboratory in wuhan?re a lot of people now- who believe that china's primary aim here isn'tjust to deny- the possibility of a lab leak, but it is to deny the possibility- that covid came from within china's borders at all. the disaster at the nova kakhovka dam on the dnieper river, flooding parts of the front line in southern ukraine, could well be a deliberately engineered effort by russia to derail ukraine's big counter—offensive. it's another extraordinary twist in this war, which almost every day seems to bring new complexities and new horrors. but how are people in moscow reacting to the way the war is going? the bbc�*s redoubtable russia editor steve rosenberg has lived and worked in the country for 30 years. things have not been going well for russia. you know, there were those explosions over the kremlin the beginning of may. there have been drone attacks on russian regions bordering ukraine. intensive shelling in recent days of belgorod region, plus russian parties and groups active there. you ha

further evidence covid-19 originated in the wuhan lab and the chinese communist party covered it up asid anthony fauci dlealgedly because he directed taxpayer money to fund it. rand paul, banking member of homeland security committee with the truth about covid and biden's soft response to china. then, is he compromised? simple as it is, the biden family business deals on america's dime. andy biggs and marjorie taylor greene following biden's money trail, how much money communist china siphoned into biden's 20 different llc bank accounts. plus, president trump says any republicans voting against adam schiff's censure should be primaried. >> he said that he saw, and i quote, smoking gun, and yet he was privileged to the information that not even i or many of my colleagues would be able to see. he used that position. he absolutely aided and abetted a corrupt fbi into investigating a sitting president. not only did he bring dishonor to the house of representatives, but he really destroyed, i think, the sense of camaraderie that we had in this country in pushing an egregious lie that that c

i was not going to be able to get on a plane for wuhan, china. it was very clear in may of 2020, none of us could go much of anywhere at that point. and there was no sign yet when that might change. and it change very soon. so i realized i'm not going to be able to do the go there thing and other problem i had was that i knew publishers all over new york talking to writers and saying, we want a pandemic. so there were going to be a bunch dozens, maybe of hundred pandemic books coming out. from new york publishers and. i needed to figure out a way to write that would be unique and uniquely valuable, interesting and another of my operating principles has always been write books about things that nobody else is writing books about. cancer is an evolution fairy phenomenon and the tasmanian devil island biogeography and extinction, molecular phyla, genetics. but there were going to be a lot people writing about this subject. so those were my two problems. i couldn't travel, i had to create a unique book in a crowded field, and so i did what any sensib

we can't even get an investigation into the wuhan lab to find out exactly how it leaked.he chinese communist party won't allow it. >> exactly. that's why we need a 9/11 style commission. get it outside of washington. we've introduced legislation last congress, this congress with bipartisan support that would do an in-depth dive into this. the preponderance of evidence shows this virus was made in a lab in wuhan, china, and as well as accidently leaked. i think that if we could get in front of a jury, we could prove that on a civil case as well. but we need to go deeper and phygoyuri colins out exactly -- figure out exactly what they did and how and with u.s. taxpayer dollars. can you believe it? maria: unbelievable. really incredible. senator, thank you for all your work and leadership. we'll be watching. thank you, sir. >> thank you, maria. maria: roger marshal in dc. a block buster jobs report health heading into the federal reservings next meeting on interest rates but there are concerns. kenny polcari is here on the details and impact on rate hike decision on the othe

further evidence covid-19 originated in the wuhan lab and the chinese communist party covered it up asnthony fauci allegedly because he directed taxpayer money to inadvertently fund it.di comingre up, kentucky senator rd paul, ranking member of the senate homeland securitynd s committee, with the truth about covid ask iswith biden's soft response to china. then, is he compromised? simple as it is, the biden a family business deals on america's dime. coming up, house oversight committee members andy biggs and marjorie taylor greene followinm biden's money trail. new details on how much money communist china alleged hi siphoned into biden's 20 the different hlc bank accounts. plus, president trump says think republicans who are voting against adam schiff's censure should be primaried. anna paulina luna broke the news of her effort to censure adam schiff right here a few weeks ago. >> h e said that he saw the, and i quote, smoking gun, and yet he s privileged to information that not even i or many of my colleagues would be able to see. he used that position.olut he absolutely aided and ab

is absurd we are supposed to act like the wuhan virus escape friday the wuhan virology facility. shocked boy that. i don't know, i think the good news we can enjoy our bat soup againful i would stay away from that albino mouse appetizer. that is a problem. no one is going to pay for this than i will try to act like and we see it now with the closing the schools and trying to do low visionist history no we wanted everyone to come back. her life is so bad she is anything to ukraine for rest am e. i'm not joking. waler. a, you are a journalist would you believe this report? i read other reports that great book by that dude rig low. i thought was good and also said points to this what do you snng i will be honest and not be funny. anyhow this 3 years ago. i think a lot of people knew this 3 years ago. not the details of the cooperation with the u.s. and its virologist researchers and the chinese. but we knew it escape period a lab. we knew that lab received funding from us. and i think that the reason we have not gotten the truth about it is that some of the big of companies in the w

on this origins, you have this -- the reporting of lax measures at the wuhan institute.nd it's very specific. december 29th, 2017, two years before the pandemic began, chinese run state run television airs a video that includes a scene of ben huh watching a lab worker handle specimens, neither are wearing protective gear the same video shows wuhan scientists hunting for bat with little protective gear. we have some of that video. if you look back, brit, and this often happens, we move on stories move on and they don't get covered elsewhere. but if you look back at the time, what was being talked about in the media about in fact our reporting on the early i stages origins this is some of that, take a listen sounds like something from marvel movie or comic book. >> don't try to whoever is wearing tin foil hats in your audience. these conspiracies theorists are still saying things that are going to be extraordinarily dangerous for this country. >> these places are not covering the new evidence where the story as it develops. >> brit: well, it's understandable on a human lev

pete: i mean, a virus cops out of wow -- comes out of wuhan and there's a virology lab in wuhan and we'reel: and a military. pete: and a military as chairman pointed out. thank you, representative brad wenstrup. next, what would cow do if killer whales started attacking the bottom of your boat? you're going to need a bigger boat. that's next. ♪ your wyndham is waiting... because after crushing yesterday's meeting... ...you deserve a little me time. with 24 trusted brands by wyndham to choose from, your wyndham is waiting. get the lowest price at wyndhamhotels.com moving this summer? join the 6 million families who discovered a smarter, more flexible way to move, with pods. save up to 30% off* until july 10th. whether you're moving across town or across the country. save up to 30% at pods.com today. ♪ ♪ the vehicles are all-electric. the feeling is all mercedes. the choice is all yours. see your dealer for exceptional offers today. as someone living with type 2 diabetes, i want to keep it real and talk about some risks. with type 2 diabetes you have up to 4 times greater risk of stroke, he

so, it's so obvious it came from the wuhan lab. the only reason somebody would deny that it came from the wuhan lab because they are providing cover for dr. fauci, it's a political badge that you stand with fauci and collins who are dangling the natural origin as if it had nothing to do with the wuhan lab. >> it boggles the mind, it's -- i can't even tell you the frustration when you hear stories like this and you see researchers like yourself, people medical professionals who know what actually happened. from sub stack public, first people sickened by covid-19 were chinese scientists, identifying the first covid-19 case as a wuhan institute scientist overseeing gain of function research has significant ramifications for investigators in search of a motive for a coverup. i mentioned that to you for two reasons i think one they are right about that, matt taibbi and others have been beating this drum as well. i mention it to you as well because it begs the question, what role did the u.s. government play in funding this research and

and nih had funded wuhan for research.his will be the only there are many more similar fundings go to wuhan or go to other chinese military. some working in the united states for chinese military. >> ainsley: does this mean dr. fauci used u.s. funds, u.s. tax dollars, sent it to china to be used to research these coronavirus and then one of them caused all of these deaths throughout the world? >> yes bioweapons. the thing is there are classified studies dr. fauci and data these people threaten to defund pretend they don't know this research can be dangerous and also cover up with china. so these are called elite capture by soviet union and china is also using the same thing to helping china. >> ainsley: ben huh is the name confirming one of the three researchers that got sick he received at least $41 million in u.s. taxpayer -- this was through the white coat waste project wuhan funding. do you think this confirms covid originated in the lab. >> you don't need evidence to show that the covid-19 virus came from the land. ma

-funded lab in wuhan, china. we are also learning that part of that funding came from a national institute of health unit overseen by dr. fauci. let's bring in kentucky senator rand paul. we know one of the first patient gs, ben hu, was probably a star student of known as the bat woman who made gain of function research, her oyster, and we believe he was operating on the same thing and turns out, according to reporting, senator, that some of the funding for his research came from the nih. what do you say about that? >> i've been saying this for a couple years now. there is a certain irony to the fact that we may well have, the taxpayer may well have funded what became the pandemic which killed millions of people and we need to know that, need to a add -- admit it, explore it, we don't want it to happen again. i've been asking the biden administration for help for two years, and what i've gotten at every turn is pushback, hiding documents, so now we have intelligence that says yes, one of the scientists who was cr

i think that came from the wuhan lab and was sent out on purpose.alking about the bat lady, i cannot pronounce her name. but dr. robert malone said they are using mrna technology not the way he wanted it used and stuff. dr. fauci gave them money, taxpayer money, to look at the virus. president obama said he did not want the gain of function, but did predict in 2014 because there is a clip saying in the next five years, there would be a virus. dr. fauci said during the trump administration there would be a virus. host: we got a lot there and a lot of names, we are going to let david quammen respond to your thoughts. guest: thank you for your statement, your ideas. you are certainly entitled to believe whatever you want to believe about the origins of this virus and i know what you are alluding to, talking about eco-health alliance, research being done at the wuhan institute and the lab. if you choose to read my book "breathless," i go into that in great depth and go into the more recent evidence in the new piece i have written over the last two month

taxpayer money went to wuhan institute of virology between june 2014 and may 2020 what does this tellnts in the first plates that is why fauci, really did not come clean as far as what the origins were because he knew that u.s. paid for it? >> two points there maria, first, in my view it is not yet entirely proven that covid-19 stemdz from research related dip although i certainly believe that is by far, the most likely origin, then for years, people in united states the business community the deposit had a philosophy that we need to engage with china that is why there was so much pressure, by the business community, for increased trade people in scientific community felt we needed scientists collaboration funding research in virology epidemiology now having a reckoning we are realizing, that while we thought building stronger relations we are in some wades investing, in a hostile power that is challenging us that is why we need to entirely rethink our relationship with china. the administration is doing that very, very big shift for the united states and the world. maria: what with i

, the virus, from the virology lab in wuhan. right. we had representative brad wenstrup on, the chairman of the house select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic, and he broke down what some of those gobble dwi cook classified documents said. >> had the to can declassify all the intelligence that they would have pertaining to the wuhan institute of virology and origins of covid. and now they present this and say there's a classified annex. the whole idea was to declassify. china has the capability, as do we, the can create a chimera, to create a gain of function type of virus. we've also discovered things that the government accountability office has revealed, that u.s. dollars were going to china for coronavirus research. but what the report did show is that there were biosafety deficiencies in china with training and with policies. but also things that we have look at is there were problems within the facilities themselves. w. will: these declassified documents were held a week longer than they were scheduled to be release

us as we can, what is your reaction to the fact fully how covid-19 showed up and whether or not the wuhanas information for us and they missed the deadline to release the documents. >> as you said they didn't just miss the deadline they violated the law and it shows how an administration that talks about the rule of law selectively pick which laws they want to comply with. there is a couple of reasons for the delay, one of they did not want this coming out before anthony blinken went to xi jinping to beg for a meeting and they did not want this report complicated not. the bigger issue and i talked to a number of different sources that worked for me in the intelligence community. they're working hard to deliver china friendly version of this report of they can in the try to put the genie back in the bottle and keep alive the idea that this could've possibly been a wet market natural origin when in fact more and more evidence supports what i testify under oath which is the circumstantial evidence overwhelming about a lab leak and some of which recently the three scientists who were working

watch this media flashback. >> this question about the wuhan lab, we know it's been debunked, that thenald trump is still pushing the debunked theory. >> a lot of people say it sound like something from a marvel movie. scientists and the intelligenc community agree that this coronavirus was not manmade. that is not a possibility. >> yeah. dr. drew, what goes through your mind when you see this new reporting? >> i mean, this is symptomatic and emblematic of what went on during covid, which is the usual scientific process where people ask questions about openly discuss things and look at evidence back and forth. it was categorically put down as misinformation. the lab leak was always a possibility. but you could not say that was the source of the virus. what dr. fauci said is correct. there was good ed of it coming from the markets, from the animal to the human. i reviewed that data very carefully. it's pretty compelling. it doesn't mean it's the explanation. doesn't mean it's correct. the fact that it's compelling doesn't mean it's the right explanation. that is how science is done. you

. >> scientists in wuhan working alongside the chinese military n wuhan d' were combing the world's mosty coronaviruses to create e new mutant virus just as the pandemic began. >> the u.s. investigators say the chinese military was funding these experiments in pursuit of bioweapons and that the wuhan institute of virology was working on a vaccine. before the pandemic began. if a country could inoculate its population, its own secret,t virus, it might have a weapon to shift the balance of world power. >> joining me now,d jamie metzr former member of the expert m advisory committeeember on humd genome editing. he's also the founder and chair of a shared world. and dr. stephen quake, physicia.n and author of the origin of the virus. jamie, let's start o you. the you came on with us a lot during the pandemic, but like me, you you probably aren't surprised of yet another report confirming the lab leak origin. but what about the stated goal r of the research by the chinese themselves in thisl? new bombshell? >> well, laura, i'm not at allat surprised, of course, that the circumstantialall su c

government knew that the confuse originated in the wuhan lab.there with the first -- we actually know the name of the three scientists who contracted it first. why was the information covered up? how many lives could have been saved had the chinese just been honest. that story next. ♪ ahhh! icy hot pro starts working instantly. with two max-strength pain relievers, so you can rise from pain like a pro. icy hot pro. way back in 1982 we took care of about forty kids and had to turn away over two hundred and fifty. it's the emotion of that moment that said man that just isn't fair, and i think it was at that moment that operation smile was born. every three minutes a child is born with a cleft condition. thousands are waiting for the cleft surgery and care your support gives. they need you. give joy and a new smile. scan the code or go online to give today. when that car hit my motorcycle, insurance wasn't fair. so i called the barnes firm, it was the best call i could've made. call the barnes firm now, and find out what your case could be worth. ♪

they all know we created wuhan flu.'ve been making on a world like you to come and ruin your life. i've been linking on a world like you, a virus contrived. yeah, making. >> greg: yes! [cheering] >> greg: nothing better than that, brooke, except your opinion on this matter. do you think china will pay for this? are we involved? is that why? everybody is guilty. >> it is so astounding to me, three years later with the death and destruction and everything we went through, we aren't an inch closer to understanding what happened and the only good news is select subcommittee hearing that just happened that was meant to investigate the origins of covid and there was testimony that showed how china destroyed samples, hid records, imprisoned journalists, prevented scientists from saying or writing anything on the pandemic without approval, actively spread information and so on. what i find more shameful is the main-stream media, western main-stream media complicity is spreading disinformation and our government's own actions wh

but it is that conclusion that there is no direct evidence that a research related incident at the wuhanndemic which some people suspected it came directly from that particular research lab and it is a place that we know had been doing research into the coronavirus before the pandemic. we know that some genetic engineering work had been going on there and some workers at laboratory fell sick. nevertheless, no direct evidence that anything that was happening, any research programme, led to the global pandemic. i say that this is quite narrow in its scope because what it doesn't do is explore in any detail at all the two most broadly plausible reasons for the spread of the pandemic, a, perhaps it spread naturally from at suspected animal or that it came from another laboratory possibly in china which of course is something that beijing denies. and peter, are all intelligence agencies on the same page in terms of how the pandemic began? know they are not and we have known for some time at the different agencies in this country have some degree of disagreement. yes, some agencies agree that

scientists working at the wuhan lab. that's according to a new investigative report that gives more weight to the lab leak theory. former cdc director dr. robert redfield will join us on that. >> sandra: sky high tensions between u.s. and china, e.v. batteries, the industry progressives claim americans should be investing their own money. >> we see china here in the united states and really everywhere around the globe right now. and right now president biden is asleep at the wheel. n homeownerg newday to pay off credit card debt that's been piling up. many were shocked to learn they've been paying 22% on their credit card balances. and if payments were late, as much as 30%. that's over three times the interest rate on a newday 100 va home loan. pay off high rate credit cards and other debt with a lower rate newday home loan. you can save $500 every month. i brought in ensure max protein with 30g of protein. those who tried me felt more energy in just two weeks. uh... here i'll take that. -everyone: woo hoo! ensure max pr

i think that came from the wuhan lab and was sent out on purpose. you are talking about the bat lady, i cannot pronounce her name. but dr. robert malone said they are using mrna technology not the way he wanted it used and stuff. dr. fauci gave them money, taxpayer money, to look at the virus. president obama said he did not want the gain of function, but did predict in 2014 because there is a clip saying in the next five years, there would be a virus. dr. fauci said during the trump administration there would be a virus. host: we got a lot there and a lot of names, we are going to let david quammen respond to your thoughts. guest: thank you for your statement, your ideas. you are certainly entitled to believe whatever you want to believe about the origins of this virus and i know what you are alluding to, talking about eco-health alliance, research being done at the wuhan institute and the lab. if you choose to read my book "breathless," i go into that in great depth and go into the more recent evidence in the new piece i have written over the last