but shouldn't wwf speak out? because obviously mostly wwf is funded mostly by individual donation.rs would feel about wwf‘s involvement with a park which is involved with killing dozens and dozens of people, maiming people, and other allegations of torturing people? as i say, we are working towards it. we want the whole thing to reduce. we don't want poaching to happen. the idea is to reduce it, involving all the partners. it is notjust kaziranga, but also the enforcement agencies, also the local people. i think the main thing is to work with the local people. and the bad news is it is notjust the anti—poaching effort that threatens local people. you can see tigers in kaziranga, but they are extremely elusive. it is easier in ranthambore, in semi—arid rajasthan. ‘l%)7’f7s

but shouldn't wwf speak out? because obviously mostly wwf is funded by individual donation.bout wwf‘s involvement with a park which is involved with killing dozens and dozens of people, maiming people, and other allegations of torturing people? as they say, we are working towards it. we want the whole thing to reduce. we don't want poaching to happen and the idea is to reduce it. it is notjust kaziranga, but also the enforcement agencies. i think the main thing is to work with them. and the bad news is it is notjust the anti—poaching asset that —— effort that threatens local people. you can see tigers in kaziranga, but they are extremely elusive. it's easier in semi—arid rajasthan. they think they have seen a tiger down by the lake, here. we are going to try and find it, now. hold on tight! go, go, go! god! that is a brilliant sight. incredibl! a brilliant view of a tiger. you can still see it. god, that was amazing. what a majestic animal. and it seemed utterly unconcerned about us. 100 years ago, there were about 100,000 tigers in the world. now, there are less than 4000.

i wonder how wwf feels about providing equipment to a park killing that many people.le. would they report that two? the thing is, it nobody is co mforta ble the thing is, it nobody is comfortable with killing people. what is needed is ongoing protection. the poaching has to stop. the illegal trade has to stop? yet, it needs to stop. but shouldn't wwf speak out? because obviously this is funded by individual donation. what you think of donors would feel about wwf‘s involvement with a park which is involved with killing dozens and dozens of people, maiming people, and other allegations of torturing people? as they say, we are working towards it. we wa nt they say, we are working towards it. we want the poaching to stop. the idea is to reduce it. it is notjust kaziranga, but also the enforcement agencies. i think the main thing is to work with them. and the bad news is it is notjust the anti—poaching asset that threatens local people. you can see tigers in kaziranga, but they are extremely elusive. we travelled to rajasthan. they think they have seen a tiger down by the

he's made the press a character in like a wwf drama. way of describing us now is the opposition party. >> i thought that was fascinating insight. tara you were on the apprentice, season three, does that ring true to you? >> absolutely, 100%. donald trump has spent the past 40 years basic perfecting and honing his leveraging of the media to his advantage. he senses vulnerabilities and what he does is lying ted, crooking hillary. he senses these vulnerabilities that exist amongst people and he boils it down into some sort of mo moniker. they stick because he's able to fair it out what that vulnerability that exists is and exploit it. i think people underestimate him. they often refer to him as being stupid or dumb or things like that. i think that's a mistake. i don't think he should be underestimates. he's a master marketer and he's taken the best practices of reality tv and applying them to his presidency. >> case in point, this week a successful roll out of his supreme court pick. there was some buzz about whether two finalists were on