a wyden can't look forward to sunday. with the rain and the -- a wide receiver can't look forward to sunday. it has been a few weeks since desean jackson injured the hamstring. how soon might he be ready to play? erin: after colt mccoy missed practice with a cut on its feet there was speculation that ring griffin could be a step closer to be the backup but it doesn't appear that way now. mccoy practiced and stock snaps in the walk-through portion of practice and he didn't appear to favored his injured foot while he ran. what happened? according to jay grude grude mccoy tried to take tame of his foot, the scissors cut him. he couldn't stop the cutting. and he told gruden not to tell anybody but the coach says he is okay. while mccoy practiced today. jackson did not. jackson suffered a hamstring injury in the season opener. head coach jay gruden said that he is still day-to-day and it's still unclear whether he will play sunday against his former team. meantime, the nationals continue their final week of the season taking o

esty in her efforts along with senator wyden and others in the senate to support s. 163 and i reserve the balance of our time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from michigan. mr. walberg: i'd like to make congressman lynch aware i have no further speakers and am prepared to close. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from massachusetts. mr. lynch: at this time i would like to introduce and welcome the lead sponsor of this bill in the house, ms. esty of connecticut has been a true champion on behalf of veterans all over this country and i yield her such time as she may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from connecticut. ms. esty: thank you, mr. speaker. i rise today in support of s. 136, the senate companion to my bill on the -- in the house, the gold star fathers act of 2015. i want to thank chairman chaffetz and ranking member cummings for their support of our gold star families and for prioritizing this bipartisan bill that would bring equity to the treatment of all gold star families. i want to thank my friend -- friends, mr. walberg a

>> one of the more interesting conversations i had is with the staff of senator ron wyden. he's a important senator up here. he didn't decide until this weekend. his staff told me one of the key indications that he was going to go yes is he got a letter from the white house to him, i have a copyright here, in which the white house gave him an assurance that the white house would stand by snapping back sanction, reimposing sanctions as soon as there is any sign of cheating by iran. we heard that before, but, gwen, what was interesting in this letter, they said not only the u.s. but european allies will also reimpose sanctions the minute there's any cheating that happens. now, you can say this isn't the word of law, this is a letter to a senator, but that just shows what these senators have gone through. they want it in writing from the white house what's going guaranteed and what's not. the other theme, gwen, you see through all these senators who have decided in the last day, none of them love this deal, in fact most, of them don't like it, but they have said, unfortunately

i agree fully with senator wyden i do think their concerns to be raised.but also this secure and controllable language. wouldn't that be an open to deliver chinese authorities to potentially get into those companies databases for property theft and other activities? >> so the chinese have a fundamentally different construct than we did. they believe in essence that access to the content of two medications and that is a sovereign right. we rejected that notion. it leads to some of the things we've seen them do. it's why we have very publicly discuss this with our chinese counterparts because they need and we want to get to a place what we can both work together, but the current approach where we are so fundamentally apart, we've been very up front, this is not acceptable. we can't sustain a long-term relationship, a kind of relationship we want to this is the approach. that the privacy of individuals, the access to intellectual property is just viewed as something that's taken to a time and place of its choosing. it goes totally against offering the speed i

and i agree with senator wyden with there being concerns that need to be raised. but the secure language, isn't that an open ability for chinese authorities to potentially get into those companies databases for property theft and other activities? >> the chinese have a different con instruct than we do. they believe access to the data is a sovereign right. we reject that notion. it leads to things we have seen them do and why we we have discussed this with counterparts because we want to get to a place where we can work together. but the current approach where we are apart and have been upfront this is not acceptable. we cannot sustain a long term relationship if this is the approach. the privacy of individuals, the access to individual property is something the state can chose. >> i hope our president will continue to raise this. and again mr. chairman, my hope is many of the businesses we saw meeting with the president in seattle i hope they will not default into lower standard. >> senator collins. >> thank you, mr. chairman. admiral rogers, let me add my thank

. >> senator wide wyden. >> thank you, mr. chairman, thank you, admiral for your professionalism. let's see if we can do the first question on bulk collection this, matter of collecting all the millions of phone records on law abiding people with just a yes or no answer because i know senator feinstein got into some of the questions with respect to implementation. i have heard you comment on this, but i'd like to see if we can do this on the record. do you expect that ending bulk collection is going to significantly reduce your operational capabilities? >> yes. >> in what way? right now bulk collection gives us the ability to generate insights we call it discovery, gives us the ability to generate insights as to what's going on out there. i would also encourage the panel as well as the committee as well as the nation to review the national academy of science's review in which they were specifically asked is there an alternative to bulk collection? is there software, other things we could develop that could potentially replace nsa's current approach to bulk collection and that impa

representative poll and lofgren, senator wyden protecting individuals from master of surveillance act provide good starting point. both of those are focused largely on law enforcement use. as i said in my opening statements, in part because the public's concern with privacy in uas is most acutely felt with law enforcement use. i don't think people are quite as concerned with uses for research, disaster relief and so forth. and on the commercials that any regulation would have to be aligned with the first amendment and, therefore, will be limited. so i think a combination of a due process standard and industry code of conduct could provide meaningful privacy protection to individual. on government use we think there ought to generally speaking the award standard with exceptions for exigent circumstances and other reasonable exceptions for law enforcement use. as well as a registry of god but uas applications that is publicly available. much the same way the faa come as a registry for small aircraft. >> you know, with all of the cameras everywhere, unlike those come on buildings, of cou

i agree fully with senator wyden, but i do think there are concerns to be raised. but also this secure and controllable language. wouldn't that be in effect an open ability for chinese authorities to potentially get into those companies' databases for property theft and other activities? >> so, the chinese have a fundamentally different construct than we do. they believe in essence that access to the content of communications and data is a sovereign right. we reject that notion. it leads to some of the things we've seen them do. it's why we have very publicly discussed this with our chinese counterparts because in the end we want to get to a place where we can both work together, but the current approach where we are so fundamentally apart, we've been very upfront, this is not acceptable. we can't sustain a long-term relationship, the kind of relationship we want, if this is the approach. that the privacy of individuals, the access to intellectual property is just viewed as something the state can do at the time and place of its choosing. it goes totally against ou

richard blumenthal of connecticut, maria cantwell of washington, gary peters of michigan, and ron wydenof oregon brings the total number of supporters in the senate to 42. the new total appears to ensure president obama will not need to veto any republican attempt to undermine the nuclear deal, since republicans now lack the 60 votes needed to overcome a democratic filibuster of a resolution against the nuclear deal. meanwhile, former vice president dick cheney has emerged as a leading critic of the iran deal, telling an audience at the american enterprise institute the agreement would "give iran the means to launch a nuclear attack on the u.s. homeland." cheney was interrupted by michaela anang, a peace protester with codepink, who called cheney a war criminal and held a banner which read, "wrong in iraq, wrong in iran." >> the iranians get the better of us in these negotiations. >> [inaudible] [indiscernible] amy: democratic presidential candidate hillary clinton is expected to deliver a major address on the iran nuclear deal today, voicing support for the agreement after helping to l

but with three more senate democrats, ron wyden of oregon and richard blumenthal in connecticut. with senator maria cantwell announcing her support tonight, well, the deal now has 42 votes in the senate. and that, that is enough to block the resolution altogether with the filibuster and keep it from getting to president obama's desk for his veto. it's a momentous victory for the white house. and a crushing defeat for the forces aligned against the deal. from lobbying groups like apac to think tanks to republican presidential candidates. some of them aren't ready to move on without trying to extract some kind of political benefit from the debacle. according to "politico," republicans are discussing the possibility of voting on friday, september 11th, to put maximum political pressure on democrats. taking a cue from alanis morrissette tweeted, ironic that congress may vote on the iran nuke deal on 9/11. donald trump and ted cruz are expected to hold their stop the iran deal on capitol hill. but today belonged to dick cheney who argued against the deal in the speech at the american

. >> and ron wyden just now. >> senator cantwell. >> what do you make? >> trying to be conservative. yes, he said publicly, i am leaning yes. he said the opponents haven't made an argument for what could be done if this deal goes down. in other words, he saw that this was something he ought to support or that he wanted to see pass. >> all the signals. >> once it was passed, he said, oh, free vote, i'm voting no. >> when you need 41 to stop the resolution from passing, because it is a no-confidence vote in our president. >> which they have, they have the 41. >> that's a major victory for the president. jeremy, a great diplomat, a great fighter on this. jeremy ben-ami of j street which you'll be hearing a lot more of in the future. >>> up next, donald trump and ben carson are making the most noise in the republican party. they're getting most of the votes right now. i'll ask haley barbour. >>> i will be totally pledging my allegiance to the republican party and the conservative principles for which it stands, and we will go out and we will fight hard, and

heavily armed police and federal agents are wydening the search area to capture these very dangerous criminals. the head of the lake county major crime task force chief george blanco and christopher can can cavelli go n the record. i have to extend our condolences. i know how tough this is. he was one of yours. this is happening across the country. i know how the police are feeling. i get the message on my facebook every day. my heart breaks for you. i know you have a mission now to find these killers. so, tell me, chief, first to you, what's the best evidence you have right now going after these killers? >> >> currently the best evidence we have is some of the forensics we have recovered from the crime scene itself and obviously the autopsy that was conducted yesterday evening. some of the other evidence that's coming in is some of the community support, tips and leads that we're receiving from the residents of fox lake. and actually some of the surrounding communities as well. >> detective, in terms of the forensic, what would make the most sense to me is that when that gun was gra

richard blumenthal, chuck schumer, gary peter and ron wyden announced their support. the final from maria cantwell this afternoon. in a speech, harry reid declared victory for president obama. >> today i'm gratified to say to my fellow americans our negotiating partner and allies around the world, this agreement will stand. america will uphold its commitment and we will seize this opportunity to stop iran from getting a nuclear weapon. >> tomorrow, republican presidential candidates donald trump and ted cruz will participate in a previously scheduled rally in washington to "stop the iran deal. it is clearly too late to do that. on "meet the press" on sunday, general colin powell announced his support for the iran deal. >> i think a vigorous verification regime has been put in place. the iaea and other organizations and especially listening to secretary of energy moniz. he knows this stuff. he's a nuclear physicist and he and the intelligence community are confident they can verify what is happening inside of iran. >> joining us now is energy secretary ernest moniz, al

senators collins, blumenthal, cantwell, peters of michigan, and oregon's ron wyden. focus on iran and the nuclear agreement will continue throughout the day today across the c-span networks. congress takes up the debate on the nuclear deal this week. the senate today, the house later in the week, and later today we'll gi bring you discussion on the technical and political aspects of the negotiations that led up to the deal. hosted by the intersnarble crisis group and the plowshares fund. among those taking part, ambassador thomas picker, and former national security advisor, samuel burger. live at is:00 p.m. eastern on our companion network c-span3 today. here on c-span we'll be live at 1:00 eastern with republican presidential candidate lindsey graham, south carolina senator is the luncheon speaker at the national press club. he is expected to talk about the iran nuclear deal also. you can see his remarks right here on c-span. again, starting at 1:00 p.m. eastern. as we mentioned the house and senate are expected to take up the iran deal this week. the house gavels

senator wyden. "none is off us knows what lies 10 or 15 years on the horizon. i have deep concerns about p what the shape of iran's nuclear program could look like beyond this horizon." senator bennet. here are the democrats on iran's financing of terrorism. "iran will be disruptive in the middle east and fund terrorist activities. this regime will continue to deny israel's right to exist. the quods force will still be listed a as a terrorist organization." senator gillibrand. "let's be clear, iran is a sponsor of terrorism and an abuser of human rights. this deal doesn't change that." senator height cap. -- senator heitkamp. "phs probable that iran will use its additional resourcesources d being a he is to additional arms to increase its support for terrorist groups." senator merkley. "i do share concerns about parts of the agreement, including how iran could use funds from sanctions relief to continue funding hezbollah and other terrorists around the world. it is clear they have been funding these activities despite crippling sanctions. and we are right to be

senator wyden, "it's a big problem having to deal with iranian leadership that wants a nuclear enrichment program." senator peters, "enrichment of uranium is a stark departure from america's nonproliferation policies. qulings close quote. he goes on to say, "the agreement could set a dangerous precedent." we need these senators to change their vote and to vote for the resolution of disapproval. senator blumenthal said, "not the agreement i've sought." senator merkley said, "significant shortcomings." according to senator gillibrand, "legitimate and serious concerns are there." and senator franken acknowledges, "it isn't a perfect agreement." mr. president, alan deas dersho" hardly a neo-con, summed up the president of the united states' deal with iran in this book -- in his book, "the case against the iran deal." he said this: "hope is different from faith, though neither is an appropriate basis on which to roll the dice on a nuclear deal that may well threaten the security of the world." "that may well threaten the security of the world," according to prefer dershowitz. "the deal as curr

senator wyden, congressman simpson, schrader have companion bills if they are not enough to inspire action, i don't know what is [inaudible] >> later this morning, the development of public land, a lot of pushback on arctic drilling. basically putting out there is a conflict within the administration. where would you say the administration is in terms of balancing the climate concerns and how do you see that fitting under your tenure? >> i will say that we are a nation that continues to be dependent upon fossil fuel. the president's climate action plan has said clearly we need to move to a lower carbon future, and i am proud to work for president that has been is direct and forceful in his michigan as president barack obama. his climate action plan speech in june of 2013 was a very clear call to action for all of the agencies to do the things within our power without congress acting to reduce our carbon footprint in this country, and there were a way to doing that pretty dramatic goals. we continue to raise the bar. that is an issue of reducing demand and providing other sources of energy

cta a big victory for the president with the iran deal, senator gary peters, richard blumenthal, ron wyden, all threw their support behind the deal. this got theresident to 41 votes in the senate, meaning most likely he will not need to veto legislation, disapproving the iran nuclear deal because now he has the votes to block the resolution. we'll see how that will affect the calendar. either way, neil, it is going to be a very busy month. neil: all right, have a feeling you'll be a very busy guy. blake burman in washington. >>> well, you know, i always like he appears on this show after a battle he took on the party leadership, stripped of committee assignment, got the committee assignment back and he's ready to raise hell again with the republican party. i don't care whether you are the right or the left, i generally admire those who risk suicide to continue doing their job. mark meadows joining us right now on what's at stake this year. congressman, good to have you, welcome back. >> neil, great to be back with you, thanks so much. neil: you know, congressman, lo and behold, i know you'

summer recess three previously undeclared senate democrats richard blumenthal of connecticut, ron wyden of oregon oregon and gary peterson of michigan announced their support for the iran nuclear agreement. that puts the number of supporters to the crucial 41 vote total that allows them to block the gop disapproval resolution with the filibuster filibuster and prevent its final vote there in the senate. senate minority leader harry reid spoke about on the senate floor along with majority leader mitch mcconnell urged democrats not to block disapproval resolution we will hear what was at the senate said about an hour from now. .. 1:00 eastern on c-span3. now senator lindsay graham speaking against the iran nuclear accord in what "time" magazine said a scathing speech blaming president obama for overlook festering international problem in order to get cooperation on the iranian agreement. senator says quote evil is doing well on his watch and he be a poor champion of freedom. from the national press club this is about an hour. >> welcome to the national press club. my name is john hughes.

cantwell, joe manchin of west virginia and freshman michigan senator gary peters and oregon senator ron wyden. this labor day weekend, three days of politics, books, and american history. on a full day of special programs on c-span, here are a few of the features for labor day monday. beginning at 10 a clock a.m. eastern, a town hall event in seattle discusses the pros and cons of big data and civil liberties. later that evening at 6:30 p.m., a debate on how to reduce poverty between president obama and the president of the american enterprise institute arthur brooks. at 8:00, mark cuban and former presidents bill clinton and george w. bush on leadership skills. beginning saturday at 10:00 a.m. on c-span two book tv, we are live all day in the nation's capital for the 15th annual national book festival with programs featuring cokie roberts and joseph ellis and your opportunity to talk with pulitzer prize-winning historian david mccullough, astronaut buzz aldrin and others sunday at noon. a live three-hour conversation on in-depth with former second lady and american enterprise institute senio

senator wyden. "none is off us knows what lies 10 or 15 years on the horizon. i have deep concerns about p what the shape of iran's nuclear program could look like beyond this horizon." senator bennet. here are the democrats on iran's financing of terrorism. "iran will be disruptive in the middle east and fund terrorist activities. this regime will continue to deny israel's right to exist. the quods force will still be listed a as a terrorist organization." senator gillibrand. "let's be clear, iran is a sponsor of terrorism and an abuser of human rights. this deal doesn't change that." senator height cap. -- senator heitkamp. "phs probable that iran will use its additional resourcesources d being a he is to additional arms to increase its support for terrorist groups." senator merkley. "i do share concerns about parts of the agreement, including how iran could use funds from sanctions relief to continue funding hezbollah and other terrorists around the world. it is clear they have been funding these activities despite crippling sanctions. and we are right to be

senator wyden told me this evening that they are undecided on the issue. minority leader harry reid and minority leader durban will be looking on the subject. those three senators and all the supported the deal will be facing a lot of pressure from a party leadership to support a filibuster. the argument they will be getting, you support the nuclear deal, you should filibuster -- if you support the nuclear deal, you should filibuster. for congress to disapprove of the deal, it was sent a confusing message about the long-term viability of the iran deal. >> let's go to the house for the committee taking up the resolution. what do we know of the schedule? hel: no amendments will be offered. it looks like there will be 11 hours of floor debate, with the debate divided among several committees of jurisdiction, which include financial services and foreign affairs. >> among the first words we heard among the agreement. peter ruslan from illinois bringing up a privileged resolution on the house floor and talking about that earlier tuesday. what is his point? thatl

increased to 42 tuesday with announcements from richard blum in connecticut, maria cantwell, and ron wyden from oregon. harry reid spoke about the nuclear agreement at the carnegie endowment. his remarks are 35 minutes. george: good morning, a few people settling in. my name is george, vice president for studies here at the carnegie endowment. it's my pleasure to welcome all of you back from the end of summer, lamentably, and the beginning of the work year here in washington, but we have a great occasion which we are honored to present to you to start it off. and that is an address by senate minority leader harry reid. and to introduce senator reid we have a dear friend and former colleague of his, congressman howard berman, who is also a friend of ours. we had the pleasure and honor of working together on a number of issues when he was chairman of the house foreign affairs committee. he's still very active in international affairs. so it gives us extra pleasure to ask congressman berman to come up and introduce senator reid. congressman berman: thank you very much, george. just before i i

breaking out as nbc's frank thorp, democratic senator ron wyden of oregon and gary peters of michiganave come out in support of the harebrained deal as well given that the 41 votes needed senators decide to filibuster the resolution of disapproval. bedard has the necessary votes to sustain president obama's theater with 30 democratic and independent inventors back in it, senator manchin is the fourth democrat to oppose the accord with chuck schumer of new york, bob menendez of new jersey and ben cardin of ireland. the senate returns to work at 2:00 eastern in the harebrained deal is the first order of business. you can watch live coverage on c-span2. >> it is now my push to invite to this stage three leaders have certainly stepped into the arena on a global scale. three leaders whom i had the most was wrecked and admiration for her. first, margaret spellings, president of the george w. bush presidential center and she will be moderating the conversation. and then two leaders i've had the privilege of serving under uzbek commanders in chief, two leaders are you with all learned valuabl

richard blumenthal, gary peters, and ron wyden threw their support behind the deal this morning.st virginia's democratic senators says he will vote against it area he is the fourth democrat to oppose the international accord. the deal have the necessary votes in the senate to sustain the presidential veto. for price president dick cheney is blasting the deal. he spoke this morning in washington. >> i know of no nation in history that has agreed to guarantee that the means of its own destruction will be in the hands of another nation. particularly one that is hostile. what president obama is asking the united it's congress to do is unique. historically, and dangerously unique. the results could well be catastrophic. matt: the white house responded by posting a video montage of cheney's statements about the iraq war. the video says cheney was wrong then, and wrong now. the iran deal is the first order of business as congress returns to work today. it is agency says mounting a worldwide campaign for equal pay for women. the leader of the u.n. women's agency says a female employment

says: senator ron wyden policies for clean energy, he says his plan will reward clean energy to sparkt may be difficult to get through congress controlled by republicans. spend 140s it will million dollars to expand a factory in indiana. it expects to add a hundred jobs over the next two years at a fluffy at the facility. -- at its lafayette facility. pimm: that is a look at the top stories at this hour. coming up in the next hour, joseph a bank is undergoing a makeover and we will look at the clothing chain's plans to cut back on discounts and update fashions. betty: we will get more insight on the men's clothing business the former zimmer, ceo of men's wearhouse. he is launching a new venture. pimm: chinese stocks again for a second session ahead of the president of china's visit to the united states begins tomorrow. that says new report the chinese economy is not as weak as it may appear. the morgan stanley head of emerging markets say that might -- says that might not be the case. >> the real problem in china for the next couple of years will be how to deal with the economic probl

you, senators blumenthal, peters, wyden and cantwell and all of the others ma made this terrible dealble. we will not forget on election day. america and the world are at the cross roads. america needs brave leaders that will follow in the footsteps of our founding fathers and great generals like george washington and patton. president obama, they are rolling in their graves in shame that america is represented by you, a weak ling, a coward and an incompetent. america is the home of the brave, not the spineless career politicians who lost their moral campus and backbone to the negotiating alter of iran who scream death to america. this treaty shall be undone and it will be undone and every single one of us here today is committed to see this through until victory. thank you for being here. go to act for america.org and join us. thank you. >>> thank you. next is my senator from georgia, senator david purdue. >> thank you. listen, thank you so much for being out here. god bless you. if feels like we're in georgia today, i got to tell you. i'm so proud of what the tea party patriots are

is senator wyden, senator crapo, congressman simpson, congressman slade schrader, their companion bills are similar in the house and senate. we have to have action by congress and if the image wes see on tv aren't enough, i don't know what is. >> okay, we're going to go to paul bedard, tommy bird, david and greg to start. kate? >>. [ inaudible question ] >> public lands, a lot of that happens under your agency. there's push back on the arctic drilling, more on atlantic coast drilling. basically pointing out this is in conflict with the administration's statements on climate change. where would you say the administration is in terms of balancing the climate concerns and fossil fuel development and how do you see that fitting under your tenure as interior secretary? >> i will say this, we are a nation that continues to be dependent on fossil fuels and the president in his climate action plan has said very clearly that we need to a move to a lower carbon future and i'm proud to work for a gnat has been direct and forceful in his messages as president barack obama. his climate action plan s

we will do that based upon seniority, which i'm sure senator wyden and senator gresh will complain to typically they might be running a few minutes behind. but with that, admiral rogers, the floor is yours. again, welcome. >> thank you. chairman burr, vice chairm feinstein, members of the committee, thank you for inviting me today. i appreciate this opportunity to speak to you about the national security agency, about who we are, what we do and how we contribute to the nation's security. in talking with you moreover i'm grateful for this chance to explain to the american public whom you represent what it is that their fellows citizens at nsa do to defend our nation as well as support allies and partners around the world. nsa plays a critical role in protecting the united states national security systems and providing insightful and actionable foreign intelligence to our leaders, military commanders, and foreign partners. we're the nation's cryptologic and america and its allies depend on our efforts. the nsa workforce approximately 40,000 employees is head quartered at ft. meade, mary

notes thatton post the announcements were made by senator richard blumenthal comer maria cantwell, ron wydenit is a margin that would deprive washington republicans of the 60 votes necessary to debate disapproval legislation. mario. you are on the air. caller: good morning. i oppose the deal. i don't think it is going to make a difference. war is coming because the shiites and the sunnis are going to go at it. you are going to have a nuclear race, there is no doubt about it . every time there was a great war, there was always a great treaty signed. i think this is just a next use to say that we are trying to prevent the war, but if anything, this is going to lead us to war. it is not going to stop the shiites and sunnis from fighting. we have the petrodollar. targeting saudi arabia because that is the biggest blow to america. war is going to come no matter what. i'm sure they want to kill the what, we arematter going into war. to pretend that this treaty is going to prevent war, history shows that that is not going to happen. host: ok. beverly is in michigan. support. michigan.silanti, i'm 7

senator wyden, "it's a big problem having to deal with iranian leadership that wants a nuclear enrichment program." senator peters, "enrichment of uranium is a stark departure from america's nonproliferation policies. qulings close quote. he goes on to say, "the agreement could set a dangerous precedent." we need these senators to change their vote and to vote for the resolution of disapproval. senator blumenthal said, "not the agreement i've sought." senator merkley said, "significant shortcomings." according to senator gillibrand, "legitimate and serious concerns are there." and senator franken acknowledges, "it isn't a perfect agreement." mr. president, alan deas dersho" hardly a neo-con, summed up the president of the united states' deal with iran in this book -- in his book, "the case against the iran deal." he said this: "hope is different from faith, though neither is an appropriate basis on which to roll the dice on a nuclear deal that may well threaten the security of the world." "that may well threaten the security of the world," according to prefer dershowitz. "the deal as curr