could leave someone with the impression they're to have to be expected if their assets are the 40 wyoming eon k or their jewelry or the the act it's acting to be listed it's relevant. >> i think we should change it to other liquid assets. there's a difference you've corrective stated like our income going to housing but i think in terms of what assets are listed it should be the same for both. and - >> except that our board has not currently changed the rest of our hardship provisions to conform to the capital hardship provisions because no one knows how that is going to work it's extremely limited you wouldn't be able to find out about the other landlords buildings. the b m r unit cap it's $60,000 if they have more than that they are precluded >> i'm not saying it's identical but would a landlord be expected to put a mortgage on their property to afford this this is not about the larger buildings but the folks who own one small building. >> i can't imagine that would happen but i see extreme six. the lard the smaup small landlord is going to have to pay half of his relocation amount and if t