wyrick, ronald abuse. here's a shipment from boston. boston is small with read some far. she threw in from us, i was just gonna go any more with the side of discuss, authority knew it was more just reduced risk in combining a little bottle with restrict mobile doing, you know, kinda skiwski used ah, the booster point by the config such as the filter brazil's permission to marshy of a proposed poster them. good. the handle now to be put out that it wasn't really, he thought that the motion with partition she's position would something that has the might several people to write 10 percent legacy boss kristian with her if she can only tear brush cooks, dust injuries, musical beach, this must be awarded atoms, apology, but i've not got that. she could boldly show it to you, but i'm not sure it's sticky. soft of logistics. we meet postponement. that's all at when she to that on. and that was really as up as was between control and preprocessor. bring me out of there, but it was not about joe feel that they're biting edge but will travel to the jelly better. thanks. lot of the

wyrick ronald abusiveness shipping from watson. you posted use one with we with some far she threw in from i will shoot him a go any more. but aside, gus doesn't believe me. it was more just as images, whiskey, a companion to read a little bottle quickly. st. navarro doing a kind of skiwski used with the booster persuade by the coughing such as the shelter, brazil permission, democracy of a proposed poster them. what do you think has all now to be? but i'm glad it was. you'll probably hear that much of a procedural re position who it's under control as the my, several people to write the super sin, an aggressive bhaskar system with our failure. she can only care, brush cooks, dust injuries, which could beat this muscle, be awarded atoms, a potter gene brother cartridge component shortage banner here is sticky soft of logistics. we meet process placement that will occur she to that on. and that was actually as up as was between control and the processor. premier levels are butcher diesel that they're biting about will travel to the

wyrick ronald abuse. here's the shipping from boston. boston is small with read. so far she threw in from us. i will shoot him a go any more. but 2 sided. gus gus told me it was more disturb lima. distinguished can combine in a little bottle with blue street now. baldwin, you know, kinda skiwski used with the push to what was going on in the conflict such as the shelter brazil hospital wishing to more she of a proposed poster them with the handle now to be with us from threats that it was a little issue with that much come with jason who had something to thursday. my several people to write some sufficient legacy mosque assist him with a theory of shake, an army ruskin stuffs dangerous would be to dismiss. you'll be awarded items apology but not only in storage partnership is to keep soft on legit. we meet pro sports but that's all i want you to that. and that was really as up as was between control and a double play with the love you deal with. so if someone please join you, i mean, they can show a notion of short, a special therapy for some reason. for the profe

they have embodied by their actis the sentents of conservative strategist paul wyrick, who dared say"i don't want everybody to vote." that's what he said. elections are not won by a majority of people. they never have been fm the begiinof our coury, and they areot now. as a matter of fact, he went on toay, our leverage in the elections, quite candidly, goes up as the voting populous goes down. second thing i said to my democratic colleagues today is that while we caot let our republic friends o the hook for not being equitable governing partners -- if we are serious about protecting the right to vote that's under assault right now, here's the truth. it will fall to democrats to do it. if democrats alone must raise the debt ceiling, then democrats ale must raise and repair the ceiling of our democracy. hodo win good conscience justify doing one and not the other? some of my democratic colleagues are saying, what about bipartisanship? isn't that important? i say, of course it is. but here's t thing we st rememb. slavery was bipartisan. jim cr segregation was bipartisan. the refusal of

they have embodied by their actions the sentiments of conservative strategist paul wyrick, who dared say in 1981, quote, i don't want everybody to vote. that's what he said. elections are not won by a majority of people. they never have been from the beginning of our country, and they are not now. as a matter of fact, he went on to say, our leverage in the elections, quite candidly, goes up as the voting populus goes down. second thing he said to my democratic colleagues today is that while we cannot let our republican friends off the hook for not being equitable governing partners, if we're serious about protecting the right to vote that's under assault right now, here's the truth, it will fall to democrats to do it. if democrats alone must raise the debt ceiling, then democrats alone must raise and repair the ceiling of our democracy. how do we in good conscience justify doing one and not the other? some of my democratic colleagues are saying well, what about bipartisanship? isn't that important? i say of course it is. but here's the thing we must remember, slavery was bipartisan ,