the issue we don't have the ability to amend the contract only say yes or no we can say no if you do xyz we can signal that but not make the adjustment. >> mike, i strongly feel i'll be voting no on the existing contract but sensitive to the revenue for the equality programs for citizens and expending to 18-year-old for the use of muni but i feel strongly about the amendments amendments. >> supervisor breed. >> i do really appreciate the comments from my colleagues, i completely understand your dilemma we have choices to make and as i said i'm not a fan of wrap buses for clarity mr. reiskin how many buses do we have in our fleet total. >> the bus fleet is about 8 hundred and 50 and 8 had the and 50 light rails and 40 or 50 streetcars. >> those are for the oldest fleet not the new ones we're purchased. >> we don't restrict by type of fleet. >> that's where a i understand in the contract. >> okay. so it sound like we'll do the oldest ones first. >> we'll not get to the new ones because we're talking about thirty. >> we'll have the entire bus fleet replaced one-on-one within the next 5 year

communications standpoint, you are asking the principle and the policy person how far could you go xyz and i sigh benghazi as something different. clippers owner donald sterling says he's not a racist. plus the historic draft in the nfl. that's next on "the five." >>> let's talk basketball. making his first public comments since a notorious tirade was released. donald sterling apologized. >> i'm a member who made a mistake and i'm asking for forgiveness. i love my league. am i entitled to one mistake? it's a terrible mistake and i'll never do it again. >> it turns out it wasn't forgiveness he was seeking. he used an opportunity to take another cheap shot at magic johnson. >> has he done everything he can do to help minorities, i don't think, but i'll say it, i'll say it, you know, he's great, but i just don't think he is a good example for the children of los angeles. >> really? expand on that a little bit. you are a communications expert, dana. is this the best way to get back in the public graces? >> you need to know when it's time to quit and it's -- his time has come. i think they

the next day said it respectful terms we have to take advantage of this to use the momentum to get xyza very specific agenda so not so much the passive organization out there but the environment for legislators to take the bill but more of the interaction with the agency on the part to be ready for a crisis. >> the bill is thought of as one of the old p.j.'s greatest accomplishments could you talk about what you saw in his role? >> on the one hand honestly he gets a little too much credit in the history people think he created the bill basically it was what would pass the house tuned of the senate. -- in the senate there was always the justice department and lobbying organizations in the coalition that supported the bill that had the players there already. for johnson he did not have to do very much and very wisely he did not say i will take this over after he left the senate he had a lot of enemies. he was not -- he was the master but when he left they said good riddance. he knew that he would make a certain number of people angry so i think the field marshal for the bill and humphrey

you can have xyz crude trains going through, but the recent derailments and fires have caught the public's attention and they want to say we want an honest discussion about what's coming through town. up until now there hasn't been a requirement for the industry to share that with the public. >> and the industry says that's a security problem for them? >> absolutely. they say that could pose a security risk, if large numbers of the public know where and when the trains are traveling. obviously we have seen a lot of are most tragic, in lac megantic, and other places, in company executive's minds. >> is there any way to appease the security concerns, at the same time, figure out a way to let people know what's going on? >> well, i think that's the tough question there. i think regulators will need to find a way to balance those security concerns with the need. and frankly, the right, for some communities to understand the risks of living close by the tracks. >> especially for near the tracks and the lake, be blake, thank you for joining us tonight. >> thank you very much. >> more secret serv

communications standpoint, you are asking the principle and the policy person how far could you go xyznghazi as something different. clippers owner donald sterling says he's not a racist. plus the historic draft in the nfl. that's next on "the five." when you sat down to dinner with anticipation, not hesitation. when you didn't dread bedtime because of heartburn. when damage to your esophagus caused by acid reflux disease wasn't always on your mind. that's when you knew nexium tion for you. because for over a decade nexium has provided many just like you with 24-hour relief from heartburn and helped heal acid-related erosions in the lining of the esophagus. and now the prescription nexium you know can be delivered directly to your door with nexium direct. talk to your doctor to see if nexium is right for you. there is risk of bone fracture and low magnesium levels. side effects may include headache, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. if you have persistent diarrhea, contact your doctor right away. other serious stomach conditions may exist. avoid if you take clopidogrel. for 24 hour support

company xyz can borrow cheap. it doesn't mean that any of their customers will interact with them in six months. borrowing cheap and a clean balance sheet is not necessarily an indicator of trouble ahead. >> rick, what's fascinating to connect those two episodes, we did have a commodity bubble and we are having a credit bubble for the same reason which is going back to the pension funds sharon was talking about to some extent because everybody needs pension funds, some of the entitlement funds out there, 7%, 8%. the more that creates a bubble now that does point badly down the road. >> sharon, what are you buying here? >> it is hard to tell given what's happened recently. i'd say fundamentally we do like the electronic sector. we like the real estate sector. agriculture. my focus has been on fixed income and the corporate market is a concern. rick makes a very good point that money is cheap to borrow right now but what do you do with it? what kind of return do you get for it? i'm actually a bit worried about corpo

gerri: do we need a letter from the bank saying, well, gerri willis can spend xyz?ll ready to go. the more you convince the seller you are a qualified buyer, the better off you're going to be, and making a good, solid offer helps as well. some of these cash buyers are going in, they're coming out with lowball cash offers, 13% discount. so if you come in and say i'll buy this house that's 1, 2, 3% higher than the cash offer, why would they not go for that if you are that qualified buyer? gerri: on your list was write a personal letter, and in san francisco during the boom, people would do this all the time. i can see my daughter in the girls' bedroom on the second -- >> sometimes that works in some of those markets where it is competitive. if the seller is looking for that right buyer for their very special home and you send a personal letter, it certainly can't hurt. i would also suggest that you try to keep contingencies to a minimum or, you know, no contingencies at all. again, a nice, clean competitive offer that is going to go head to head with the cash offer. g

usually they say don't buy xyz brand. in this recall we don't know.is really frustrating to advocates who have been working to make it easier her son went from totally healthy to dead in 12 days. here we are in 2014 and i still can't tell people. >> i got two answers. she said i zroent the authority. we can't tell consumers what brands not to by the second thing is that it's very complicated. if you look at this case you have that one beforer who issued the recall. there are more than 200 distributors. one of those 200 alone has 7500 customers. so you can see that this is, it's not like when a pharmaceutical company recalls a drug. this is complicated. this is thousands of people who need to contact other people. >> what do you do when you want to eat a burger because i just did last night? >> as did i. i think the people whose house i was at thought i was crazy. >> i feel good if i was eating a burger with you. >> you have to look for thissest code on the product and look for these production dates. >> so you can looking if sr. something. on some of

that is why it hurts survivors so much to have someone else say because yousual didn't do xyz. it needs to exist. >> the problem is that this is not a federal crime. unless you're in the district of columbia or in indian reservation, these crimes are state crimes. we cannot define for states elements of their crimes. >> we can do models and incentives. >> that is one thing we should look at. how can we incentivize states to update their definitions of consent? i was surprised we still had 16 states that said it was only by force or threat of force. that is a lot of states that still do not understand that is an inappropriate and incomplete definition of consent. >> that is what laura was talking about. when you go back to the negotiated rulemaking and coming up with a consensus, if we can get states to the point where they are consistent in their loss. under the new regulations, dating violence is not listed. you will continue to have an inconsistent definition between what other municipalities and sheriffs departments are reporting and what college campuses are reporting. >> s

i really need this xyz. a cheaper price for a stripped-down service or anyone a higher price, more elaborate service. in the beginning, competitive days of telephone service. that flexibility was a tremendous advantage. we end up with this categorization game. i was talking to a person managing the xbox by microsoft. you see regularly and say just because we have a chat feature doesn't make it a telephone. don't regulate it like a telephone. canjust because the xbox employ video doesn't make it a cable service. what this means is that we start laying this game. who provides a service that resembles or replaces something that it did before is going to have this fight about whether they are in or out. think thist people and its coste game will exceed the benefits of doing so. >> one of my collects used to refer to it as a metaphysical , parsing these complicated definitions. what i'm hearing you say is at the end of the day, it matters less than the practical consequences of what classification means. see bran

and the ceo of xyz, our guy is just as good as his.f top salaries has cost the shareholder money. disclosure is the great disinfectant. sunshine has crossed american is shareholders money. >> you're right. that's apec attitude of ours. but we're right, just as moses was. >> and perhaps people in between. >> we're going to continue this conversation with charlie and warren. in fact, when we come back, we are adding yet another amazing business leader to this conversation. microsoft founder bill gates will join us live right after this break. our conversation will continue in just a moment. as we head to break, check out the squawk market indicator. futures are still in the red. [ indistinct shouting ] ♪ [ indistinct shouting ] [ male announcer ] time and sales data. split-second stats. [ indistinct shouting ] ♪ it's so close to the options floor... [ indistinct shouting, bell dinging ] ...you'll bust your brain box. ♪ all on thinkorswim from td ameritrade. i'm spending too much time hiring and not enough time in my kitchen. [ female ann

i have someone else said it is consensuaconsensua l because you didn't do xyz when we lived through it. i don't know yet what can be done at the federal level but that's missing. it wasn't able to be done through clery added needs to exist. >> the problem is this is not a federal crime. and less you on, in the district of columbia or indian reservation. these crimes are state crimes, so we can't define four states elements of their crimes. but we can do models and incentives. >> weekend. i think that's one thing we should look at in legislation is how can we incentivize states to update their definitions of consent. i was surprised was to let 16 states that said it was only by force or threat of force. that's a lot of states that still don't understand that that is an inappropriate and incomplete affirmation of consent. >> that's exactly, what laura was talking about specifically but also when you go back to negotiated rulemaking and coming up with a consensus, the piece on the ucr and nibrs, get states to the but what are consistent because even now under the new regulation of law law