and this administration is there is no one around him who disagrees, no one around him to tell him xyz, that is false. it is the opposite. he has people around him at all times who disagree with each other and disagree with different aspects of what is being discussed and always welcomed to offer different insights, inputs, ideas and impressions and that is a very refreshing thing. the tax reform and tax relief, two different things, principles are the same. the fair and simple parties we as a nation, 7 billion hours and billions of dollars each year complying with this byzantine labyrinth called the tax code. we need to make it similar to do e-filing, simpler and easier so middle-class taxpayers that can't afford fancy aa should be paying the money in a software package and could be buying educational software for the children instead. we need to make it similar and easier to comply to the tax code. stuart: at the start of this hour i told our audience you were our guest and you were the only person i know of whoever rained in the president's twitter account. did you in fact take it a

or undo xyz. - yeah, and you could argue if a mainstream conservative like a marco rubio had gotten in, or john kasich. - what would be different? conservatives might like kasich less, right? - yeah, and part of the reason for that is that i think that people like rubio and kasich aren't just ideologically conservative, they're temperamentally conservative and donald trump is here to sort of break things and donald trump is here to sort of break things and create chaos, so when you have the nomination of neil gorsuch, you had first of all mitch mcconnell refusing to even have hearings refusing to even have hearings on the merrick garland nomination. - by the way, you good with that? - i'm very good with that. - you are. you don't think that there is weapons-grade hutspa in the republicans complaining about how neil gorsuch was treated when merrick garland was left outside the store pressing his nose against the glass? - well it's rank hypocrisy, i'll be the first. - rank hypocrisy. - absolutely. no but i'm okay with it, and look. - but why are you okay with it? if it's rank hypocris

kand instead to the people already in these guys only promise tos, if you do xyz, i would like to seee money flowing. there are a lot of smart women in the valley. a lot of them are in the venture business. let's enable a few of them to create their own fund and get after it. there are new funds launching on the time you have people. able to get funds raised with what i would even go as far as to say aren't records you would look at and say, yes, i'm going to find that new venture. there are plenty of super qualified women out there that i with lpse to see more and institutional investors putting their money where their mouth is. emily: quickly, i know you are very focused on hiring women at at a smaller stage making sure it is 50-50. what is your vision for this company? a social fitness platform. our vision is that in the real world the way people get healthy and live healthy is through social motivation and social accountability. online, most business platforms are one-on-one. program for you. then you do it and try to keep yourself motivated in isolation. chorus is about getting a

in front of you, circle around them and xyz the next day? >> thank you. the first part is how the decision occurs. there are neurons in our brain that take up. tick up. this is true for all of us. there is dopamine and pain pathways that allow us to unconsciously want to do what others are doing. mothers do what other moms are doing. where is one third of us were smoking when i was in medical school. -- norms have changed feared have changed. we can get to a person who is them to use a gun and ask what were you thinking and get them a different expectation. added on to these processes, described in this book, are the effects of trauma, causes people to be hyper reactive, thinking everything is against them. all of these things are reversible. in the short term we cool someone down. we let them go down to where they can listen to someone. we validate their concerns and then we reframe it so that they are still positive. your last question will stay , with that person for six months to two years so they'll not circle back. socollect shadowing

society where people who are not muslim look at row and say if you are muslim why are you not doing xyz. based on your experience, how do you feel like you are not live up to that idea or checklist but still being okay with it and feel like you are a muslim and that is okay? >> first, it is your own identity. nobody can define your identity unless you are at the airport and then they can chose it. it is an exciting thing to think about and a good way to keep the seat next to you open. i learned from my experience on amtrak, if you open a bookin arabic, it could be anything, cake recipes even, and no one will connectwith you. to be human, fundamentally human, is to neither accept yourself as you are because if you fully accept yourself as you are you are donald trump. if you just accept i am who i am and nothing is in need of improvement then you become a terrible, wicked person. if you think i am perfectly fine as-is, and that is a boring life. why would you want to live a life that is fine as you are? education, art, family, relationships, you don't want any of them to be static. and i

all of us have been in organizational situations where xyz is in a job. what do we do? we create a workaround. it hurts those professionals who are doing their jobs well. we know that and they know that. look it's kind of like base closings. i hear people talk about their special issues. it's the best base ever because you have people in your own state employed. that's what we hear a lot of. i know it's a special thing for a special state or special interest. i hope we'll do away with all of them that are unnecessary. and most of them are unnecessary. ipping the professionals believe they are unnecessary. we just had one created unfortunately for ukraine. here we have the secretary of state says that most of these things are unnecessary rand then he creates one. well, this person is going to carry out some important policy for our nation. right? this ukraine issue is very important. if they're going to do that hey ought to at least be confirm. if we have somebody carrying out policy, we ought to be able to confirm them. so these positions are duplicative, waste none, ha

all of us have been in organizational situations where xyz is in a job, not doing the job well, so what we do? we create a workaround and arts the culture. it hurts actually those professionals that are doing their jobs well and we know that and they know that come and y'all learned this from this listening to her. so look, it's kind of like base closings. i hear people talk about their special issue, you've got a basic held state come it's the best bass ever obviously because you've got people in your own state employment that's what we're having a lot of, i'm sorry it's a special thing for a special state or special interest, i hope will do away with all of them that are unnecessary. i think most of them are unnecessary okay? i think the foreign service professionals believe they are unnecessary. we just had one created, unfortunately, for ukraine. here we have a secretary of state says most of these things are unnecessary and then he creates one. well, this person is going to carry out some important policy for our nation, right? this ukraine issue is very important. if we're going t

honestly, it's xyz or this or that and that's true where this didn't happen, no they haven'thh conclusionit's not something. no, he doesn't work wndith putin and have a hammer and sickle. jesse: today listen to you? >> they listen to me but i'm nor sure they hear me. i'll keep pounding my head against the wall because here's the thing. i'm independent. i see where there is truth and i if your argument is better than mine and you can convince me, i'll believe it. je jesse: is hard to argue with facts. cnn taking more heat for the c need to identify the person behind the. two of the present body slamming the cnn logo. he shared the video on there and it went viral.th they reportedly threatened the identity of the man. when you hear about a company as big as cnn going after some little guy on the internet, howe does that make you feel? >> is discussing. it makes them look absolutely terrible. it's a very, very bad luck for cnn.'s a it's pretty ver numb.ng thet. they've also guaranteed that there will now be 900,000 meme of donald trump and cnn. jesse: you can now found about a million. the r

honestly, it's xyz or this or that or it's not true or this didn't happen, no they haven't proven collusioning. no, he doesn't work with putin, he doesn't have a hammer and sickle. jesse: they listen to you when you say that? >> they listen but i don't know that they hear me. i'll keep pounding my head against the wall. here's the thing for me. i'm independent. i see where there's truth and i'll say when your argument is better than mine and you can convince me i'll believe it. jesse: is hard to argue with facts. cnn taking even more hit for threatening to identify the person behind the gif of president trump body slamming the cnn logo. it started when he shared the t video on twitter and went viral. they hunted down the creator and threatened to reveal his identity. when you hear about a company going after some little guy on the internet, how does that make you feel? >> it's disgusting. it makes them look absolutely terrible. it's a very, very bad look for cnn. it's hurting them. they've also guaranteed that there will now be 900,000 meme of donald trump. jesse: if you look on the right n

this is their opportunity when the vote's this close they say can we want xyz included in this bill. look, i served in the legislature, i know what it's like, they could be working together, and they're not doing that. >> democrats are ready to work together. it's mitch mcconnell who has locked the door. you've been reporting this, you know this, this is not fake news. we only want republican votes. the answer is, if democrats -- republicans would just say stop, drop, repeal and say replace or mend it, don't end it, they could get 85 votes for this thing, to fix what's wrong with obama care, but don't throw the baby out with the bath water as a good conservative friend of mine told me about it this weekend. >> got to leave it there, thanks, gentlemen for coming on. >> thank you. >> happy weekend. >>> at one time these women flocked to join isis fighters, lured by the romance and adventure, now the terror group is crumbling, and the brides are trapped. they're telling cnn about what life was really like inside isis. you're live in the cnn newsroom. . no. yep. did it help? it completel

because if you sanction the abc corporation, the next day, the xyz corporation doing exactly the same business. >> what do you up the sanction anti against china. we tried, we took the chinese at their word, we were going to try to handle this, for whatever reason they couldn't or didn't. now he seems to open to taking punitive action. what should they do? >> sweeping. if we believe china is violating the security council sanctions or turning a blind eye while others do, how about a sanction that says no chinese financial institution can do business in the united states. unless, unless you have a tough sweeping comprehensive set of sanctions, the chinese will double-talk us again, as they have for 25 years. our attention span is notoriously short and this is how north korea has progressed to the point we are now over the last 25 years. >> neil: that's what i wonder, we express our outrage and they use outrage a lot, it is a powerful word, but even with the chinese and the russians, they're saying the same about north korea's provocative actions. but they take great umbrage to us wanti

i also told the guys in the communications department that you will never hear me say hey, go leak xyz on so and so i want to influence the president's decision on firing the guy. i will never do that. this guy's terrible. >> one, you said somebody above your wrappingk wanted him out. was that the president. >> i didn't answer the question, chris. i'm getting so subtle and surgical in term the. >> you're as subtle as a heart attack. you report directly not president. >> just remember what koch said. the. >> you want to bring up ed koch, may he rest in peace. let's talk about him. he called you on the phone. and he said mario, i got a problem with you. or whoever it was i have a problem with you. he dealt man to man, face-to-face because he believed people deserved the dignity. >> look. >> this is not an ed koch meddlmeddlodel. >> this is a guy that's made $10 billion for himself and family and a guy that is -- doing well and do it the right way -- >> ed koch once said if you believe in nine out of the 12 things i'm saying you should vote for me. then if you believe 12 out of the 12 you

we'll actually suggest the right person so for instance we might suggest that you should reach out to xyzeason why is because they were your former buyer at an existing customer and just move to a new code that node identifies hasa higher deal size potential and exactly what those signals are and at a user level, node will prescribe how that individual can relate to that person when picking up the phone and calling. >> so is it something in past lives would have been done by mckenzie or recruiters >> yeah. >> dunn & bradstreet had books of prospects >> that's what we're seeing. ai will be impacting businesses where you don't need to spend hundreds of thousands. it can happen in seconds through platforms like ours. and that will shift our business world from focusing on analysis and human crawling to actually judgment and having the technology serve up those recommendations to us. >> one of virtues we hear of a google/facebook is that they have the raw data right there in-house what are you looking at in terms of mining? >> we use the web. so we're making sense of all the relationships tha

it's been very transactional thing where people been tightly inside getting xyz benefits and paying this much induce, i have no real connection to any decision-making process in our union. i think that's very worrying anything to some degree this is almost deserve some of the downfall of american unions. my hope is to these rank-and-file struggles and unions will, in fact, convince people they have something to gain, they have invested interest in unit. even something like the fact that you might be a member of the union today because of the vote that happen three or four decades ago. there is some truth in right-wing arguments about unionization this as an that's fundamentally undemocratic, having the continuation repairs may be something fundamentally undemocratic about condition of employment having to be a union member, then having to have your dues deducted every month without you having any say in the matter and so on. europe, in europe unions don't have to rely on those mechanisms, right? i think fundamentally we need a more democratic labor movement. for now this is this is a lab

form suggests he's prepared to do a deal with putin to release or to lift sanctions in exchange for xyz, cha will be a real win for putin no matter how you count it. >> is president trump really in a position to do that, though, seeing that he's got congress against him? >> i agree. in fact, the fact of the matter is that in some respects there are executive branch sanctions that were imposed by president obama that can be unilaterally released by president trump. but it is no doubt that the president's wiggle room because of the allegations of russian meddling many the election as well as congress' anger an resentment towards putin makes it extraordinarily difficult for him to do anything than glad hand putin at this point. >> ned, you bring up a number of points about president trump's speech in poland yesterday you think has been talked about and covered. what the president didn't do was underscore those important points. when he took to twitter this morning he tweeted about john podesta. everyone here is talking about why john podesta refused to give dnc server to the fbi and the ci

mostly from going after x y z, does that do brother cool off in front of you, circle around them and xyz the next day? request thank you. the first part is how the decision occurs. there are norms in our brain that -- we see other people do. this is true for all of us. there is dopamine and pain pathways -- allow us to want to do what others are doing. monster what other moms are doing. is one third of us were smoking before when i was in medical school -- or that this change. the norms have changed and now we can get to a person who is about to use a gun and ask them -- were you thinking and get them a different expectation. processes, these described in this book, are the effects of trauma, causes people , thinkingr reactive everything is against them. all of his things are reversible. in the short term we cool someone down. down to where they can listen to someone. then we really famous so that they are still able to do this. last question -- will stay with that person for six months-two years, so they'll not circle back. her or shadowing -- but as a long-term effect on the person is

lawyer.t is the russian name -- we will just referred to her as russian agent xyz or something. a russian company we see millions of hours connected why .he crime the other is not mentioned. americanussian lobbyist. the new york times described him as a master of the dark arts. these two where reportedly at the meeting with the trump campaign and family members last summer. they reportedly offered dirt on the opponent to get a meeting and made their pitch against the act. was it a come -- was it a clumsily great and switch? someully we will get answers from mr. trump and mr. manna fort on that point. details ofo produce mr. simpson's role on this event. knowing exactly who is acting on behalf of the russian government is vital. that's why pharaoh must be enforced consistently and evenhandedly. other words it won't be taken seriously. to discussing with the witnesses. to turns my pleasure the table over to my ranking member. >> thank you for bringing everybody up to date on a discussion on the witnesses that were on the schedule here but not at the present time. the foreign agent

the first is a russian lawyer -- natalia read -- -- her asefer to him russian agent xyz. [laughter] a russian company received millions of dollars connected to crime for his uncovering. the other person is a russian-american lobbyist with reported ties to russian intelligence. the new york times described him arts.aster of the dark these were reportedly at the meeting with the trump campaign with family members last summer. they offered dirt on the opponent to get a meeting and made their pitch against the acts. great -- was i-- t bait and swtich? hopefully we will get answers on that point. pursue details about mr. simpson's role in the creation and circulation of the dossier that started this whole controversy. knowing exactly who was acting on behalf of the russian to get to is vital the bottom of the influence in our democratic system. fara must be and forced otherwise it will not be taken seriously. i look forward to discussing the witnesses additional steps. now it is my pleasure to turn the table over to my ranking member. >> let me begin with a comment. in q4 brin

we'll just refer to her as russian agent xyz or something. pr er prevazon is a russian company connected to millions of dollars. the other person is a russian american lobbyist with reported ties to russian intelligence. "the new york times" recently decried him as, quote, a master of the dark arts, end of quote. these two were reportedly at the meeting with the trump campaign and family members last summer. they reportedly offered dirt on the opponent to get a meeting and then made their pitch against the magnitsky act. was it just a clumsy bait and switch effort in their unregistered propaganda campaign? hopefully we'll get some answers from mr. trump and mr. manafort on that point. we will also pursue details about mr. simpson's role in this event and the creation and circulation of the dossier that started this whole controversy. knowing exactly who was acting on behalf of the russian government is vital to get to the bottom of russian influence in our democratic system. that is why fara must be enforce consistently and even handedly. oth

holdings, her name natalia veselnitskaya, as you know, we peel just refer to her as "russian agent xyz" or something. [ laughter ] prevesan is a russian company that received millions of dollars connected to crime for mr. magnitsky's uncovering. another russian american lobbyist, the "new york times" recently decried him as a master of the dark arts. they were at a meets with the trump family and made a pitch to get around the magnitsky act. was it a clumsy bait-and-switch effort in their unregistered propaganda campaign? hopefully we'll get answers from mr. trump and mr. manafort on that point we will pursue details about the creation and circulation of the dossier that started this whole controversy knowing exactly who was acting on behalf of the russian government is vital to get to the bottom of russian influence in our democratic system, that is why fara must be enforced consistently and even handedly. otherwise it won't be taken seriously. i look forward to discussing with the witnesses additional steps to better enforce fara and now it's my pleasure to turn the table over to my

if he on the other hand said, if you go to computer xyz in the second room of the nsa you can hack intof i lies about it, that is his biggest peril, was there anyone else in the room? no, no one else in the room. turns out this fifth guy, this soviet guy. ainsley: want you to react. we talked to kellyanne at white house. >> when i was campaign manager in those last several months i, when i needed negative information about hillary clinton, i didn't have to go very far. i looked at hillary clinton. she was a treasure trove. she was like a treasure box of negative hillary information with arms and legs. again, what kind of money are we going to spend by the taxpayers having these infinite investigations. there are many of them. if we're going to do that, fine i suppose. but we really need to spend our time also telling people what is being done here for them. and that is not being covered at all. brian: legally -- >> i don't think that is particularly helpful to the trump position. i think what the trump position has to be right now is, everything was benign. everything was legal. clumsy,